2.0L LNF Performance Tech 260hp and 260 lb-ft of torque Turbocharged tuner version.

Direct bolt-on turbo (ko4 replacement)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 27, 2013 | 12:14 PM
  #1151  
Omiotek's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 07-04-10
Posts: 3,262
Likes: 66
From: Carol Stream, IL
it will make a difference as ours is setup for stock so we would absolutely have to have your manifold to make it work properlay and weld the bung in the correct spot.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2013 | 01:49 PM
  #1152  
Fastgti69's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-05-11
Posts: 2,570
Likes: 1
From: Encino,Ca
Originally Posted by Omiotek
it will make a difference as ours is setup for stock so we would absolutely have to have your manifold to make it work properlay and weld the bung in the correct spot.
Crap, I mean that obviously makes total sense.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2013 | 02:05 PM
  #1153  
SunburstSS's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: 12-26-09
Posts: 3,167
Likes: 2
From: V.A. U.S.A
I Dyno tomorrow...Cant wait !

A stock SS/TC dynod at 230whp/220wtrq last week on the same dyno, lets see what my setup will get
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2013 | 02:22 PM
  #1154  
Fastgti69's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-05-11
Posts: 2,570
Likes: 1
From: Encino,Ca
Originally Posted by SunburstSS
I Dyno tomorrow...Cant wait !

A stock SS/TC dynod at 230whp/220wtrq last week on the same dyno, lets see what my setup will get
That is reallly good that you have a base. Start a thread and load up the base file dyno for now.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2013 | 04:20 PM
  #1155  
oldskool's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 06-21-09
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
From: Reading, PA
Originally Posted by 40rty
Cool thing about the WR-x's is that they work well with the Kappa. The ZFR(on Kappa's) was having some clearance issues and Oldskool was working with ZZP about it but I haven't heard anything else.
Apologies for the lack of updates. ZZP has been fantastic both in communication and accommodating my build. They came up with a custom WG bracket and different BW WG actuator. Power steering reservoir relocate is a must, as is cutting up the black bracket that holds the reservoir and fuse box. The stock connection to the airbox doesn't fit the compressor inlet. Other than that, it's all good. In between snow storms and tuning other peoples cars, I'm working on a 15 psi tune and getting the boost in as early as possible. Even on 15 psi from the ZFR, I'm seeing more air through the MAF than the K04 on 22-23 psi (max 32 lb/min vs max 38 lb/min). Overall, I'm very happy with it so far.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2013 | 07:03 PM
  #1156  
Sully20's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-03-11
Posts: 1,069
Likes: 0
From: Pottstown, PA
Originally Posted by kdub1492
It's a big turbo, fitment was a big issue honestly.

I made 412/425 on 93 with 14* up top and 24.5#'s
How was spool time with the WR3?
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2013 | 04:40 PM
  #1157  
SunburstSS's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: 12-26-09
Posts: 3,167
Likes: 2
From: V.A. U.S.A
Dyno'd my ZFR setup today

The Numbers were : 355whp/327wtrq

https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/dyno...inally-295525/
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2013 | 04:41 PM
  #1158  
ULWizSS's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 07-30-10
Posts: 2,865
Likes: 1
From: Florence, NJ
Originally Posted by SunburstSS
Dyno'd my ZFR setup today

The Numbers were : 355whp/327wtrq

https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/dyno...inally-295525/
Nice numbers conservative tune i would expect. Reading the info on it now
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2013 | 04:56 PM
  #1159  
Terminator2's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-25-08
Posts: 12,450
Likes: 6
From: Florida
Originally Posted by SunburstSS
Dyno'd my ZFR setup today

The Numbers were : 355whp/327wtrq

https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/dyno...inally-295525/
Type of dyno? Correction factor? Boost used? 91 or 93 octane?
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2013 | 06:50 PM
  #1160  
SunburstSS's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: 12-26-09
Posts: 3,167
Likes: 2
From: V.A. U.S.A
Originally Posted by Terminator2
Type of dyno? Correction factor? Boost used? 91 or 93 octane?
It was on a Dynojet, these are uncorrected numbers, the SAE numbers would make a grown man cry lol, I have the turbo spooling full 23 psi at 4000rpm and ramping before that. This was on 93 gasoline & timing ramped up to 15 degrees up top
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2013 | 08:24 PM
  #1161  
Shortbus's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-25-06
Posts: 4,493
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Congrats!
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2013 | 10:20 PM
  #1162  
AARON-SS-TC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 07-24-11
Posts: 2,983
Likes: 1
From: Bradenton, FL.
looks like 430whp on 93 is not feasable Term
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2013 | 10:30 PM
  #1163  
kdub1492's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: 12-07-10
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by AARON-SS-TC
looks like 430whp on 93 is not feasable Term
Don't be so set on numbers man. Dyno's ARE FOR TUNING. I have been in the same car (mine) that felt fast, and pulled harder making less power. It's all in the tuning. You are working with one of the best tuners, he will have your car running strong and safe at 400
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2013 | 10:52 PM
  #1164  
AARON-SS-TC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 07-24-11
Posts: 2,983
Likes: 1
From: Bradenton, FL.
oh believe me, i know, TERM2 is awesome.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2013 | 11:24 PM
  #1165  
Stamina's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-09-09
Posts: 4,374
Likes: 5
From: Tejas
Originally Posted by kdub1492
Don't be so set on numbers man. Dyno's ARE FOR TUNING. I have been in the same car (mine) that felt fast, and pulled harder making less power. It's all in the tuning. You are working with one of the best tuners, he will have your car running strong and safe at 400
Thank you for pointing this out. People get so caught up on numbers sometimes and forget the purpose of a dyno.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2013 | 03:24 AM
  #1166  
Omiotek's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 07-04-10
Posts: 3,262
Likes: 66
From: Carol Stream, IL
yep. people all seem to expect more and more and more. like i tell people if you send up making good numbers on a mustang expect even better numbers on a dynojet
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2013 | 04:24 AM
  #1167  
40rty's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-11-08
Posts: 3,888
Likes: 1
From: San Diego
Term2 is an amazing tuner.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2013 | 06:44 AM
  #1168  
ULWizSS's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 07-30-10
Posts: 2,865
Likes: 1
From: Florence, NJ
Originally Posted by AARON-SS-TC
looks like 430whp on 93 is not feasable Term
I made 427/381 on my ZFR LSJ setup with 21psi so i dont see why not.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2013 | 07:19 AM
  #1169  
ULWizSS's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 07-30-10
Posts: 2,865
Likes: 1
From: Florence, NJ
Attached my Dyno Sheet

Reply
Old Mar 29, 2013 | 02:03 PM
  #1170  
strazdice's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 03-24-10
Posts: 962
Likes: 0
From: wisconsin
Originally Posted by Stamina

Thank you for pointing this out. People get so caught up on numbers sometimes and forget the purpose of a dyno.
Ya but it is soon forgotten, all they care about is the numbers not how the car runs
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2013 | 02:04 PM
  #1171  
Fastgti69's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-05-11
Posts: 2,570
Likes: 1
From: Encino,Ca
^^ good graph and nice curve. I still think ZZP's dyno reads high lol.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2013 | 04:50 PM
  #1172  
AARON-SS-TC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 07-24-11
Posts: 2,983
Likes: 1
From: Bradenton, FL.
its all about the numbers....not
of course I am concerned about the power band. Hell, it could be a 1000whp, but for only 1k rpms, so who would care///
I want power through out the whole powerband.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2013 | 07:35 AM
  #1173  
ULWizSS's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 07-30-10
Posts: 2,865
Likes: 1
From: Florence, NJ
Originally Posted by Fastgti69
^^ good graph and nice curve. I still think ZZP's dyno reads high lol.
Well i will be on another dyno here soon again once we add another meth nozzle and retune, bump up some timing etc.

Its a tuning tool nothing else. I could care less what it made honestly, i dont look at things that way only dyno queens do IMO.

I care about what it runs at the track. Those times dont lie.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2013 | 09:10 AM
  #1174  
Terminator2's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-25-08
Posts: 12,450
Likes: 6
From: Florida
Originally Posted by Fastgti69
^^ good graph and nice curve. I still think ZZP's dyno reads high lol.
Yes it does. I believe they fudge the weight and CD to make it read much higher than a mustang dyno should. They had a BNR 2871 car with a 2.1 and cams at 27 psi make 460 whp on that dyno which should be 500 whp on a dynojet which is not possible. IMHO that car would make around 410-420 whp on a properly calibrated dyno.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2013 | 09:20 AM
  #1175  
Terminator2's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-25-08
Posts: 12,450
Likes: 6
From: Florida
Originally Posted by AARON-SS-TC
looks like 430whp on 93 is not feasable Term
EFR flows at lot more at 28-29 psi than it does at 20-21 psi. The BNR2871 over in puerto made over 400 whp and 390 wrtq at 24-26 psi on 93 octane and I believe the EFR is more efficient at higher compressor speeds (torque holds longer which will translate into more hp up top) I think it can be done
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:10 PM.