Cobalt SS Network

2.0L LNF Performance Tech 260hp and 260 lb-ft of torque Turbocharged tuner version.

dissapointing dyno

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-20-2013, 01:34 AM
  #51  
New Member
 
4g63killer's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-31-11
Location: CNY
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just a comparison of dyno variances I dynoed 396whp and 389 wtq with a zfr on 93 running 25psi! I went to track running the same tune and similar conditions and trapped 114! That doesn't add up! A good site to calculate your trap speed into hp is ajdesigner.com. Punch in the weight with you in car and trap speed to get a general idea of bhp! Subtract 10% drivetrain loss and that should be a good estimate! Unless using the same dyno for every modification IMO trap speed is a better way to measure power with similar conditions of coarse!
4g63killer is offline  
Reply Like
Old 05-20-2013, 06:19 AM
  #52  
Senior Member
 
dcrep06's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-12-12
Location: delaware
Posts: 2,139
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by m33pm33p
so you are mad that for less than $1000 you got an increase of 80hp and 110 foot pounds of torque from stock?

Go buy a honda then.
lmao. do they even have torque? O.o lol
dcrep06 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 05-20-2013, 10:25 AM
  #53  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Kbbalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-29-09
Location: Fort Washington, MD
Posts: 591
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was disappoint i Expected more... That's Natural with anybody expecting a lot... I'm over it now...I'll just make it faster
Kbbalt is offline  
Reply Like
Old 05-20-2013, 10:35 AM
  #54  
Got Brakes?
Platinum Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Sox-Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-23-09
Location: Mt. Pleasant S.C.
Posts: 12,766
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
The hp is reasonable. The tq is very low. I rolled 312/386 on Saturday with a stock turbo, as a comparison. You need to get ahold of Term2.
Sox-Fan is offline  
Reply Like
Old 05-20-2013, 10:49 AM
  #55  
New Member
 
mike1coolguy88's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-13-13
Location: northwest indiana
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
my zfr did 389whp on a mustang on 93 pump gas, pwerks is building my 5th injector set up now for e85
mike1coolguy88 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 05-20-2013, 11:24 AM
  #56  
Senior Member
 
dcrep06's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-12-12
Location: delaware
Posts: 2,139
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Sox-Fan
The hp is reasonable. The tq is very low. I rolled 312/386 on Saturday with a stock turbo, as a comparison. You need to get ahold of Term2.
agreed^^ torque should be much higher for sure
dcrep06 is offline  
Reply Like
Old 05-20-2013, 02:51 PM
  #57  
Rent me! per hour
 
Area47's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-22-07
Location: Still fixing others mistakes.
Posts: 24,185
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 14 Posts
looks like it was knocking up top.
Area47 is offline  
Reply Like
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KMO43 Oct FCOTM
KMO43
Front Page News
33
01-12-2016 12:01 AM
GMS1 base tune lnf sedan
maliki778
Dyno Results
4
10-01-2015 07:39 PM
Finally Dyno'd My Car
footballplaya3k
General Cobalt
15
09-28-2015 11:14 AM
KMO43 FCOTM + Build Thread
KMO43
Featured Car Showcase
37
09-27-2015 08:53 PM
For Sale Evo 8, built bottom end, big turbo, for trade
Cptnslo
Complete Cars
9
09-24-2015 09:32 AM
Back to Subforum
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
View Next Unread
Another p2178




Advanced Search
Quick Reply: dissapointing dyno


Reply Closed Thread Share

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:55 AM.