2.0L LNF Performance Tech 260hp and 260 lb-ft of torque Turbocharged tuner version.

Just got back from the dyno

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 16, 2009 | 12:52 PM
  #51  
widowedeight's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-05-07
Posts: 1,779
Likes: 0
From: pa/jersey
Originally Posted by L.P.
The bottom number they stopped early and it was technically the third run on the dyno they forgot to hit the record button on the first one. The dyno operator told me the first number was a lot more accurate than the 2nd.

wow you NEED new fmic lol heat soak like a **** from the second run

Originally Posted by WhiteSSBalt
Damn, those things are torque monsters! I'm sure with an aftermarket downpipe, I/C, and I/C charge piping you'd be close to 400 wtq.
holy crap i didn't know that at max you'll get 40wtq from those 3 mods..... wait........ummm i think you are confused....

Last edited by widowedeight; Mar 16, 2009 at 12:52 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2009 | 01:07 PM
  #52  
Matt M's Avatar
Former Vendor
 
Joined: 06-03-08
Posts: 4,169
Likes: 8
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Originally Posted by revhigh18
now a ford probes turbo i cant even put my dick in the compressor inlet
It's probably best that you can't. The chopped off finger in the turbo story was bad enough.
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2009 | 01:11 PM
  #53  
cakeeater's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-17-07
Posts: 9,378
Likes: 0
From: right behind you.
Originally Posted by L.P.
They quit making power pretty much at 5800 rpms...I believe its due though to the shorter gearing. The tq probably ends quick on these engines because of the small turbos as well.....I believe these numbers are good enough for high 12's if I can get the power to the ground we will see though...I will post up my slips.
it's because of the turbo size. it's runnin out of efficiency up top. gearing doesn't change power delivery, it shifts it.
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2009 | 01:18 PM
  #54  
HunterKiller89's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-20-06
Posts: 11,183
Likes: 4
From: Los Angeles
^^ i enjoy educated posts
you too steddy, since you said the same thing earlier
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2009 | 01:22 PM
  #55  
Steven Flit's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 06-04-07
Posts: 2,530
Likes: 1
From: Los Angeles, CA
definately...

that's still crazy power lol...
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2009 | 01:32 PM
  #56  
L.P.'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-06-06
Posts: 1,529
Likes: 0
From: Clintwood, VA
The last run they cut off early so therefore it was unaccurate readings....the first run they did fully but it did not record because the guy forgot to hit the record button. So therefore the first run on that sheet is technically my second.
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2009 | 03:05 PM
  #57  
Terminator2's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-25-08
Posts: 12,450
Likes: 6
From: Florida
Originally Posted by L.P.
The last run they cut off early so therefore it was unaccurate readings....the first run they did fully but it did not record because the guy forgot to hit the record button. So therefore the first run on that sheet is technically my second.
Are your numbers on that sheet STD correct or uncorrected?
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2009 | 03:54 PM
  #58  
L.P.'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-06-06
Posts: 1,529
Likes: 0
From: Clintwood, VA
Originally Posted by Terminator2
Are your numbers on that sheet STD correct or uncorrected?
Corrected...sorry for not responding to that I did not see it.
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2009 | 04:16 PM
  #59  
Terminator2's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-25-08
Posts: 12,450
Likes: 6
From: Florida
Originally Posted by L.P.
Corrected...sorry for not responding to that I did not see it.
OK. Excellent torque number. Highest corrected I have seen for the trifecta tune by quite a bit. The hp will jump up probably another 10 whp if you add a DP. The Dejon intake must help quite a bit. I noticed a difference when I put mine on. I am going back to get redynoed on thurs to see what I make with my boltons and some more tuning.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2009 | 07:27 AM
  #60  
blackbird's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-18-05
Posts: 1,070
Likes: 1
From: Boston & SoCal
Originally Posted by revhigh18
you or obsessed with flow limitations of our stock turbo it is not that small... if it can push mid to low 300 hp range it is not small now a ford probes turbo i cant even put my dick in the compressor inlet that has "flow limitations"...
It's all a matter of perspective. Compared to a Holset on a turbo diesel truck, the K04 is a baby turbo. Compared to the stock T25 on my Grand Prix it's massive.

I think it's actually sized fairly well to the application and still has a little headroom for those who like to modify the car. But there's a reason why it's not going to make a ton more power over the lower 300 mark at the wheels and why those who try will see a massive torque spike in the midrange and diminishing returns on the top end as rpms and airflow requirements through the engine increase. You might call it obsessive, but dang right I'd be looking at air flow (or more appropriately air mass) the stock turbo can provide if you're wondering what it can support and what's to be expected out of a stock turbo LNF.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2009 | 08:22 AM
  #61  
boosted4dr's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-16-08
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
From: Viera, Fl
Originally Posted by blackbird
It's all a matter of perspective. Compared to a Holset on a turbo diesel truck, the K04 is a baby turbo. Compared to the stock T25 on my Grand Prix it's massive.

I think it's actually sized fairly well to the application and still has a little headroom for those who like to modify the car. But there's a reason why it's not going to make a ton more power over the lower 300 mark at the wheels and why those who try will see a massive torque spike in the midrange and diminishing returns on the top end as rpms and airflow requirements through the engine increase. You might call it obsessive, but dang right I'd be looking at air flow (or more appropriately air mass) the stock turbo can provide if you're wondering what it can support and what's to be expected out of a stock turbo LNF.

Humm...TGP! Such great cars in its day! 205hp out of a 3.1 in 89-90.....Those where fun cars, and extremely rare indeed! Have any pictures?
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2009 | 08:46 AM
  #62  
Terminator2's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-25-08
Posts: 12,450
Likes: 6
From: Florida
Originally Posted by L.P.
You shouldn't have removed tq management it will make it impossible to launch at the track.

Driveabiltiy is the same in low boost and no boost feels just like stock until you punch it.
I have my torque management completely removed. I love it. I need stickier tires though. I can still launch hard but it takes some getting used to. Once you relearn how to drive the car afterward it launches harder than stock unless you use too much right foot.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2009 | 09:50 AM
  #63  
blackbird's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-18-05
Posts: 1,070
Likes: 1
From: Boston & SoCal
Originally Posted by boosted4dr
Humm...TGP! Such great cars in its day! 205hp out of a 3.1 in 89-90.....Those where fun cars, and extremely rare indeed! Have any pictures?
There should be one in my gallery here. I have all the pieces to swap in the Getrag 282 5-speed which should make it a fun driver if I can ever get around to working on it.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2009 | 10:29 AM
  #64  
malachii's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 07-27-08
Posts: 126
Likes: 2
From: Toronto
Hey guys, I'm looking at the numbers in this post (and I realize they are the highest TQ numbers thus far), but I'm wondering where the gains are coming from in his mods...

1. Is this a 91 or 93 octane tune?

2. Does the muffler delete do anything power-wise for our system?

3. I may go K&N to remain stealthier at the dealer - I know they can find out about the tune, but do they actually check all the time? Probably not. But then, what do I know? I'm sure I'll lose a few HP though.

4. What does one expect the 91 to 93 octane difference would be in our cars when tuned? I can get 93, but rarely. It would make road trips a huge pain.

Thanks,

Mal.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2009 | 10:53 AM
  #65  
Terminator2's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-25-08
Posts: 12,450
Likes: 6
From: Florida
Originally Posted by malachii
Hey guys, I'm looking at the numbers in this post (and I realize they are the highest TQ numbers thus far), but I'm wondering where the gains are coming from in his mods...

1. Is this a 91 or 93 octane tune?

2. Does the muffler delete do anything power-wise for our system?

3. I may go K&N to remain stealthier at the dealer - I know they can find out about the tune, but do they actually check all the time? Probably not. But then, what do I know? I'm sure I'll lose a few HP though.

4. What does one expect the 91 to 93 octane difference would be in our cars when tuned? I can get 93, but rarely. It would make road trips a huge pain.

Thanks,

Mal.
Intake maybe. Probably how the dyno reads though he still has his stock DP on there. He has the same tune but fewer mods as the test car which made 314 whp and 347 wtrq uncorrected and approx 301 whp and 330 wtrq corrected

Last edited by Terminator2; Mar 17, 2009 at 12:55 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2009 | 01:16 PM
  #66  
HunterKiller89's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-20-06
Posts: 11,183
Likes: 4
From: Los Angeles
the power is coming from the ECM really. the stock ECM limits power to 260hp. The tune eliminates that, and allows the engine to make the 300+whp that it is capable of from the factory
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2009 | 01:42 PM
  #67  
Terminator2's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-25-08
Posts: 12,450
Likes: 6
From: Florida
Originally Posted by HunterKiller89
the power is coming from the ECM really. the stock ECM limits power to 260hp. The tune eliminates that, and allows the engine to make the 300+whp that it is capable of from the factory
Yes, but his torque numbers is approx 30 ft-lbs higher than the car trifecta developed the tune on and the test car had more mods. Intake may be accounting for some of that extra torque as the test car was using the stock intake, but not 30 ft-lbs.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2009 | 02:08 PM
  #68  
boosted4dr's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-16-08
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
From: Viera, Fl
Originally Posted by blackbird
There should be one in my gallery here. I have all the pieces to swap in the Getrag 282 5-speed which should make it a fun driver if I can ever get around to working on it.
Humm....cannot remember if my 93 GTP had the 282 or the 284 Getrag....I would avoid that tranny if its coming from those cars, was a nice tranny, until you needed something for it!

I've had 3 GP's and really liked that body style vs the change they did in 97 lol. 90 TGP, 93 GTP (3.4 DOHC 5spd) then purchased a 96 GTP (swapped the 3.4 DOHC to a 3800 S/C).....

Originally Posted by Terminator2
Yes, but his torque numbers is approx 30 ft-lbs higher than the car trifecta developed the tune on and the test car had more mods. Intake may be accounting for some of that extra torque as the test car was using the stock intake, but not 30 ft-lbs.
You simply cannot compare dyno vs dyno...Too many things get involved. The one reason Dynojets are so popular though is because no user input into them unlike Mustang/Superflow, w/o knowing which dyno's both the test car and his car where dyno'd on, its just a waste of time to compare them. Thats why running a stock dyno run is important to see where the mods take you from your stock, and keep w/ the same dyno for your comparsion results with trying to keep relative same conditions as well.

Last edited by boosted4dr; Mar 17, 2009 at 02:08 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2009 | 02:22 PM
  #69  
DNewman's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 11-28-07
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
From: Roanoke, VA
Awesome numbers! Where did u go to get dyno'd? I am looking for a place to go and see your in VA.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2009 | 03:25 PM
  #70  
malachii's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 07-27-08
Posts: 126
Likes: 2
From: Toronto
I'm still hoping to hear from the OP if this is a 91 or 93 octane tune. I'd also like to hear from others about their thoughts on the muffler delete. Does it make any more power at all?
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2009 | 03:43 PM
  #71  
Sentry's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-25-07
Posts: 1,382
Likes: 0
From: East Texas
Awesome, Trifecta is the ****! I bet Vince is blown away with these LNFs.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2009 | 07:48 PM
  #72  
Terminator2's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-25-08
Posts: 12,450
Likes: 6
From: Florida
Originally Posted by malachii
I'm still hoping to hear from the OP if this is a 91 or 93 octane tune. I'd also like to hear from others about their thoughts on the muffler delete. Does it make any more power at all?
Muffler delete will do nothing but add sound. The most restrictive part of the stock exhaust is the stock cats on the DP followed by the stock resonator. The stock muffler was tested by CIA to flow 560 CFM. The stock turbo flows only 36 lbs per min max which is approx 450 CFM.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2009 | 08:41 PM
  #73  
turbo08ss's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 10-14-08
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
From: n.ridgeville ohio
how is that dejon intake treating you i put one on my car and it wont run right i took it off runs perfect i got the trifecta tune with dejon ic piping and greedy type rs bov had the cai but like i said with the cai my car ran like absolute **** took it off runs perfect
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2009 | 09:05 PM
  #74  
cresintern's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 03-10-09
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
From: Bridgewater, NJ
what is torque management, is it something similar to what a mazdaspeed 3 uses in it's first 2 gears? and how much was the tune, total price?
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2009 | 11:32 PM
  #75  
HunterKiller89's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-20-06
Posts: 11,183
Likes: 4
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by Terminator2
Yes, but his torque numbers is approx 30 ft-lbs higher than the car trifecta developed the tune on and the test car had more mods. Intake may be accounting for some of that extra torque as the test car was using the stock intake, but not 30 ft-lbs.
i dont think he's asking what causes the difference between the test cars power and the posted numbers...i think he's asking why just a tune makes so much power on these cars, which is what i answered
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:48 PM.