Psykotuned LNF
Well I'll just have to plug my unit in, you can get on my laptop and it'll be over in a 28 second flash. Before you know it you'll be having more fun with a stick than you've ever had in your life, and you'll be bragging about me to all of your friends, and then hooking me up with them so I can do them next.
Well I'll just have to plug my unit in, you can get on my laptop and it'll be over in a 28 second flash. Before you know it you'll be having more fun with a stick than you've ever had in your life, and you'll be bragging about me to all of your friends, and then hooking me up with them so I can do them next.
You'd never make it to 28 seconds.
Steve.
just a few snip-its.
the ic out of the factory runs about 94% thermal eff. with a <.9 PSI PD across it (stock here)
if you bump the boost (or hold at 21per say) its only a small drop the 89% range...still much more efficient then more after market IC / IC systems.
goes to show people what proper planing can accomplish.
also, IDC's in this car will rise at an exponential rate, not linear like the LSJ...as your Delta-P drops with fuel pressure IDC's rise. thus non-linear.
and boy-oh-boy wait till you see all the tables that i can see in that PCM...you'll cry.
i sent Area some specs on all the fun thats ahead.
just a few snip-its.
the ic out of the factory runs about 94% thermal eff. with a <.9 PSI PD across it (stock here)
if you bump the boost (or hold at 21per say) its only a small drop the 89% range...still much more efficient then more after market IC / IC systems.
goes to show people what proper planing can accomplish.
also, IDC's in this car will rise at an exponential rate, not linear like the LSJ...as your Delta-P drops with fuel pressure IDC's rise. thus non-linear.
and boy-oh-boy wait till you see all the tables that i can see in that PCM...you'll cry.
i sent Area some specs on all the fun thats ahead.
At that point, though, aren't you looking more at a fuel pump issue rather than IDC? If the pressure starts to drop, naturally the injectors will have to stay open longer to move the same amount of gas, but the pressure shouldn't drop at all unless the pump isn't able to keep up with demand, yes?
Steve.
just a few snip-its.
the ic out of the factory runs about 94% thermal eff. with a <.9 PSI PD across it (stock here)
if you bump the boost (or hold at 21per say) its only a small drop the 89% range...still much more efficient then more after market IC / IC systems.
goes to show people what proper planing can accomplish.
also, IDC's in this car will rise at an exponential rate, not linear like the LSJ...as your Delta-P drops with fuel pressure IDC's rise. thus non-linear.
and boy-oh-boy wait till you see all the tables that i can see in that PCM...you'll cry.
i sent Area some specs on all the fun thats ahead.
just a few snip-its.
the ic out of the factory runs about 94% thermal eff. with a <.9 PSI PD across it (stock here)
if you bump the boost (or hold at 21per say) its only a small drop the 89% range...still much more efficient then more after market IC / IC systems.
goes to show people what proper planing can accomplish.
also, IDC's in this car will rise at an exponential rate, not linear like the LSJ...as your Delta-P drops with fuel pressure IDC's rise. thus non-linear.
and boy-oh-boy wait till you see all the tables that i can see in that PCM...you'll cry.
i sent Area some specs on all the fun thats ahead.
At that point, though, aren't you looking more at a fuel pump issue rather than IDC? If the pressure starts to drop, naturally the injectors will have to stay open longer to move the same amount of gas, but the pressure shouldn't drop at all unless the pump isn't able to keep up with demand, yes?
I'll keep my eyes on individual cylinder activity then, and compare the Wideband AFR on the dyno to the commanded Lamda.
I just wonder how hard, and what all is involved in upgrading the cam-driven pump. And is the tank pump up to the task as well, or will that need to be upgraded as well?
I'll leave that up to someone else.
the in tanke pump is more then sufficient for big power....that pump is all about flow, not pressure.
the real FP could be mod'ed and / or swapped for a larger one fairly easily.
there are tons of HUGE flow mechanical FP's out there. make an adapter to fit the drive on the new pump from the old one, mount it, call it a day.
however the stock turbo wont be able to max that pump, nor will many other common turbos that people will use on this car.
the real FP could be mod'ed and / or swapped for a larger one fairly easily.
there are tons of HUGE flow mechanical FP's out there. make an adapter to fit the drive on the new pump from the old one, mount it, call it a day.
however the stock turbo wont be able to max that pump, nor will many other common turbos that people will use on this car.
Honestly, though, now that HPT is out and functional, how long before we see swaps?

edit: Here it is -
http://tunersource.gmblogs.com/blog/...ting-into-2008
Originally Posted by GM Tuner Source
We made a couple changes in the engine calibration, removed the catalytic converter, and installd a free-flowing 3-inch exhaust. While we may not pass government emissions testing or meet the longevity requirements for the GM Powertrain warranty, we were able to get 330 horsepower and 425 ft-lbs of torque from the production engine.
swaps could off already happened. its up to the owner.
the car needs a larger compressor wheel...its not a "true" K04 wheel....its a HP variant of the K03 comp wheel.
the stock turbo has been pushed to numbers like that, and beyond.
theres a few config's floating around that'll put the car to about 310-ish whp/ 380wtq.....but you dident hear that from me.
the car needs a larger compressor wheel...its not a "true" K04 wheel....its a HP variant of the K03 comp wheel.
the stock turbo has been pushed to numbers like that, and beyond.
theres a few config's floating around that'll put the car to about 310-ish whp/ 380wtq.....but you dident hear that from me.




Someone else already has dibs on thisss lol.