Ran my Balt on a Dynojet Today
Joined: 09-29-06
Posts: 20,662
Likes: 216
From: Land of Freedom
It makes almost exactly the same peak hp on 93. In fact, the highest hp I've made on our dyno with this setup was on 93.(482whp) DI motors aren't like what you are used to. The advantages to running higher octane and added timing are:
1. The power doesn't fall off until a higher RPM.
2. Less chance of damaging a piston.
1. The power doesn't fall off until a higher RPM.
2. Less chance of damaging a piston.
Member
Joined: 12-12-08
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
From: NEPA & Jacksonville FL
It makes almost exactly the same peak hp on 93. In fact, the highest hp I've made on our dyno with this setup was on 93.(482whp) DI motors aren't like what you are used to. The advantages to running higher octane and added timing are:
1. The power doesn't fall off until a higher RPM.
2. Less chance of damaging a piston.
1. The power doesn't fall off until a higher RPM.
2. Less chance of damaging a piston.
have you dyno'd the kit using 110 or higher? and what rpm range does the pwr fall off?
since the 3bar comes with the kit, but what about the ECM?? send in mine or I get one programmed (swap)??
i bet, i can get this motor to break the 10 or 9 sec range in a sedan and 8 sec range in a coupe..
the more i read about the improvements on this, the more i think this motor can take it.. (550/600+whp range w/bullet proof bottom & top)
ive cleaned up my pm box.. my bad.
Last edited by redstarpa69; May 17, 2010 at 12:06 AM. Reason: spell check
Senior Member
Joined: 09-09-09
Posts: 1,155
Likes: 0
From: Kalamazoo, MI
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
Joined: 06-03-08
Posts: 4,169
Likes: 8
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Actually that was with the S256 and ported head last year. It would have been much quicker, but we had a lot of ECM issues. We raced once this year and ran 11.8 at 127 launching conservatively. When we turned it up and launched with boost, the trans grenaded. We will have it back at the track within the next couple weeks.
Senior Member
Joined: 01-12-09
Posts: 4,220
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Actually that was with the S256 and ported head last year. It would have been much quicker, but we had a lot of ECM issues. We raced once this year and ran 11.8 at 127 launching conservatively. When we turned it up and launched with boost, the trans grenaded. We will have it back at the track within the next couple weeks.
I forsee some good times in the future!!!
Senior Member
Joined: 02-21-06
Posts: 972
Likes: 0
From: Raceland, LA
Former Vendor
Joined: 02-14-06
Posts: 1,885
Likes: 0
From: Western NY
We headed out to the Bullseye Power open house today. My SS/T is set up with the following:
ZZP turbo upgrade kit with Bullseye S252et turbo
ZZP upper charge tube with 50mm BOV
ZZP Intercooler (standard, not the race IC)
ZZP lower charge tube with MAF relocation
ZZP dyno tune on ZZP/Trifecta ECM
ZZP Valvesprings
ZZP S4+ clutch
ZZP transmission
ZZP catback
104 octane
Stock cylinder head
Stock cams
Every mod on this car is available to purchase through us.
28psi fading to 25 by 6800 RPM. I dyno'd this etup earlier in the day at our shop and put down 465whp STD.
First pull on the dynojet read 497sae whp and 509 tq.(514/526 std) The graph was pretty choppy, but I did another pull.(It was two pulls for $55 at the open house.) The 2nd pull graph was much smoother and I put down 508 STD whp and 494 STD ft lbs.
Despite having a 4.45 final drive in the ZZP trans, I still averaged 33mpg on the way home crusing 80mph most of the time.
ZZP turbo upgrade kit with Bullseye S252et turbo
ZZP upper charge tube with 50mm BOV
ZZP Intercooler (standard, not the race IC)
ZZP lower charge tube with MAF relocation
ZZP dyno tune on ZZP/Trifecta ECM
ZZP Valvesprings
ZZP S4+ clutch
ZZP transmission
ZZP catback
104 octane
Stock cylinder head
Stock cams
Every mod on this car is available to purchase through us.
28psi fading to 25 by 6800 RPM. I dyno'd this etup earlier in the day at our shop and put down 465whp STD.
First pull on the dynojet read 497sae whp and 509 tq.(514/526 std) The graph was pretty choppy, but I did another pull.(It was two pulls for $55 at the open house.) The 2nd pull graph was much smoother and I put down 508 STD whp and 494 STD ft lbs.
Despite having a 4.45 final drive in the ZZP trans, I still averaged 33mpg on the way home crusing 80mph most of the time.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post