2.0L LNF Performance Tech 260hp and 260 lb-ft of torque Turbocharged tuner version.

ZZP Ported Head and S1 Cam Combo Package - debunking thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 7, 2011 | 02:05 PM
  #26  
BYT*SS*TURBO's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: 05-01-09
Posts: 5,973
Likes: 0
From: NEPA/North NJ
You don't remember calling Matt spedboy among other names? lol.. Manic much?
Old Feb 7, 2011 | 02:06 PM
  #27  
CudaJoe's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 04-21-09
Posts: 11,280
Likes: 74
From: Newark, DE
Originally Posted by ProjectScarab
Because it gives a baseline of what can be achieved on just a stock platform. What if someone was considering a turbo upgrade and thought this might be a better way to go and save some cash? Knowing that they could build off of it in the future, at least they have a starting point. Is that really an unreasonable request?
I would say they need to research because if they did, then they would know a cam upgrade is almost pointless unless you have a turbo to keep up with the engine...
Old Feb 7, 2011 | 02:17 PM
  #28  
ProjectScarab's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 12-23-09
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Originally Posted by Matt M
You have to speculate that the power might not come in till 7500 rpm when the torque is 500 and the hp is 400?
What I don't get is that you started off posting graphs of the early accomplishments, did you not? Now that the testing is done and you're bringing the product to market you refuse to show anything. You guys want to stand on the "variables" argument but it doesn't really hold water. You constantly use your vehicle as an example of what can be done. In fact, it would stand to reason that if anyone replicated it they should be awfully close to the same results, give or take a few percentage points. So if you've used the "Matt's Example" to show what's possible up until this point, why stop where you did?

I applaud the 400 plus dyno runs that you've made in search of power, I really do. It shows a commitment to the platform that should be celebrated. If only more companies showed us that much love we might be further along in development then we are now.
Old Feb 7, 2011 | 02:19 PM
  #29  
ProjectScarab's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 12-23-09
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Originally Posted by CudaJoe
Scarab is trying to get ZZP to waste time and money to put this kit they devised onto a stock turbo cobalt to see what kinda power it puts down on a dyno.
Not at all. It's already been done if they're making the claims of how much HP a stock motor/stock turbo will make with the upgrade. I'm just asking to see the graphs that support the claims.
Old Feb 7, 2011 | 02:21 PM
  #30  
ProjectScarab's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 12-23-09
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Originally Posted by BYT*SS*TURBO
You don't remember calling Matt spedboy among other names? lol.. Manic much?
I remember all of it quite clearly. Are you trying to dig up a dead thread in order to make a real point or just trying to stir things up? I can think of better hobbies.
Old Feb 7, 2011 | 02:22 PM
  #31  
BYT*SS*TURBO's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: 05-01-09
Posts: 5,973
Likes: 0
From: NEPA/North NJ
Have you seen ANYONE else with 400+ whp on the stock turbo? NO. /thread yet again. Obviously working...
Old Feb 7, 2011 | 02:24 PM
  #32  
ProjectScarab's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 12-23-09
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Originally Posted by CudaJoe
I would say they need to research because if they did, then they would know a cam upgrade is almost pointless unless you have a turbo to keep up with the engine...
Taken from the product ordering page found here: Cobalt & Ion ---> ZZ Performance

"If you’re car is not far from stock and you have a stock tune, this combo will net you approximately 100 horsepower. Much of this comes from the tune where we can increase turbo output."

100 HP is worthless to someone with a stock motor that doesn't want to invest $4K+ on a turbo upgrade?
Old Feb 7, 2011 | 02:27 PM
  #33  
ProjectScarab's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 12-23-09
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Originally Posted by BYT*SS*TURBO
Have you seen ANYONE else with 400+ whp on the stock turbo? NO. /thread yet again. Obviously working...
I still don't get your point. What is this in reference to again?
Old Feb 7, 2011 | 02:32 PM
  #34  
BYT*SS*TURBO's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: 05-01-09
Posts: 5,973
Likes: 0
From: NEPA/North NJ
You said the Kappa guys have trouble reaching 300whp, people on this forum have reach 350+ and now ZZP topped it all with over 400whp. Those results aren't self explanatory?
Old Feb 7, 2011 | 02:33 PM
  #35  
Zooomer's Avatar
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 12-13-05
Posts: 1,693
Likes: 3
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Originally Posted by ProjectScarab
Because it gives a baseline of what can be achieved on just a stock platform. What if someone was considering a turbo upgrade and thought this might be a better way to go and save some cash? Knowing that they could build off of it in the future, at least they have a starting point. Is that really an unreasonable request?
The request has been answered and we'll answer it to any customer who is wondering. Is it a better way to go than changing the turbo? depends on your needs. That's why you ask ZZP and we discuss it. HP gains have been given of 100HP from stock to this kit. Need to see the dyno, too bad I guess. Come here with a stock car, we'll dyno before and after and if we don't produce demod and refund the money.
Originally Posted by ProjectScarab
I still don't get your point. What is this in reference to again?
It's in refernce to our discussion where you posted 369WHP with all your mods and claimed that your setup was
working. A good dyno number means your parts are working and poor one means they are not. Get it?

If a car puts down 400WHP with the stock turbo, it's clearly got some bad ass parts on it. Do you disagree or not understand this?

Specifically you have an upgraded turbo, ported head, and many mods. 369WHP means your parts are not working. In fact no one has posted such a low dyno number with similar mods.
Matt had a stock turbo with all ZZP parts and did 400+WHP. That means his parts are working better than anyone else.
Old Feb 7, 2011 | 02:34 PM
  #36  
Matt M's Avatar
Former Vendor
 
Joined: 06-03-08
Posts: 4,169
Likes: 8
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Originally Posted by ProjectScarab
And the reason for not giving them to others is???? Just trying to get some perspective here.
I share plenty of numbers with others. In fact, I've emailed and PM'd a few people just today with HP estimates for their particular application and how they can plan accordingly.
Old Feb 7, 2011 | 02:36 PM
  #37  
HunterKiller89's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-20-06
Posts: 11,183
Likes: 4
From: Los Angeles
so you want them to back up their approximation when it is already well established that a tune alone typically given 60-80whp? ...effectively bitching that they aren't providing 'proof' that porting the head and a set of cams will add roughly 30 more horses?
is that really your whole concern here?

edit: i just really dont see why you are doing this. Why not call them? no one here is taking your side on your opinions of what ZZP "should" be doing, so why make it public and take criticism from everyone watching such as myself?

IMO this happens when you try and degrade the reputation of the company that you insist on publicly raising doubts about. Why else would you make a thread on it...so others can see? Seems to me others have been seeing fine, and none are agreeing with your logic
Old Feb 7, 2011 | 02:36 PM
  #38  
Matt M's Avatar
Former Vendor
 
Joined: 06-03-08
Posts: 4,169
Likes: 8
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Originally Posted by ProjectScarab
I've asked Matt to be civil.
...implying that I have not been? Your perception must be quite skewed if you feel that you are the one maintaining civility around here.
Old Feb 7, 2011 | 02:42 PM
  #39  
Supercharged Guy's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-27-09
Posts: 3,721
Likes: 0
From: Concord, NH
This guy is still getting all bent outta shape about a damn ported head...jezz ban this guy already
Old Feb 7, 2011 | 02:44 PM
  #40  
Matt M's Avatar
Former Vendor
 
Joined: 06-03-08
Posts: 4,169
Likes: 8
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Originally Posted by ProjectScarab
Because it gives a baseline of what can be achieved on just a stock platform. What if someone was considering a turbo upgrade and thought this might be a better way to go and save some cash? Knowing that they could build off of it in the future, at least they have a starting point. Is that really an unreasonable request?
Sort of. I'm not going to put the stock IC, charge tubes, and intake on just to perform this test. Since the chance of someone doing a ported head as their first mod is almost zero, it would not be worth the time and effort to test that combination.
Old Feb 7, 2011 | 02:48 PM
  #41  
ProjectScarab's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 12-23-09
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Originally Posted by BYT*SS*TURBO
You said the Kappa guys have trouble reaching 300whp
I didn't make that statement. It was made by Kelu actually.

Originally Posted by Zooomer
It's in reference to our discussion where you posted 369WHP with all your mods and claimed that your setup was working.
You mean the build I referred to as NOT working right? The build that still has bugs to work out but still put down 403hp/355tq? The build that made those numbers with a hurt turbo? That build? I guess you really are worried about it if you can't stop talking about it.
Old Feb 7, 2011 | 02:49 PM
  #42  
Zooomer's Avatar
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 12-13-05
Posts: 1,693
Likes: 3
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Originally Posted by Matt M
Sort of. I'm not going to put the stock IC, charge tubes, and intake on just to perform this test. Since the chance of someone doing a ported head as their first mod is almost zero, it would not be worth the time and effort to test that combination.
You should test with 87 octane because some people like to save money.
Old Feb 7, 2011 | 02:51 PM
  #43  
BYT*SS*TURBO's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: 05-01-09
Posts: 5,973
Likes: 0
From: NEPA/North NJ
So, again we come to this. If the car WASN'T working properly why would you post info to help someone's ported head thread? Clearly it didn't help and the rest is paper racing say what it could do. Back to thread #1 now lol.
Old Feb 7, 2011 | 02:52 PM
  #44  
ProjectScarab's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 12-23-09
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Originally Posted by Matt M
I'm not going to put the stock IC, charge tubes, and intake on just to perform this test.
So then where did the 100hp number come from? There must be a graph that exists somewhere that shows it.
Old Feb 7, 2011 | 02:53 PM
  #45  
SOHC24powa's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-10-10
Posts: 545
Likes: 0
From: Gastonia, NC
Originally Posted by Zooomer
You should test with 87 octane because some people like to save money.
win.
Old Feb 7, 2011 | 02:54 PM
  #46  
ProjectScarab's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 12-23-09
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Originally Posted by Zooomer
You should test with 87 octane because some people like to save money.
And maybe he should continue to test with 110 octane cause that's how most guys drive on the street too.
Old Feb 7, 2011 | 02:55 PM
  #47  
ProjectScarab's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 12-23-09
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Originally Posted by BYT*SS*TURBO
If the car WASN'T working properly why would you post info to help someone's ported head thread?
See post 41
Old Feb 7, 2011 | 02:57 PM
  #48  
Zooomer's Avatar
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 12-13-05
Posts: 1,693
Likes: 3
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Originally Posted by ProjectScarab
So then where did the 100hp number come from? There must be a graph that exists somewhere that shows it.
Tell you what. You point out a claim that we made regarding these cams/heads/tune that you don't believe to be true. I'll put up $1000 against yours and provide the dyno to check on. That way we can both be held acountable to claims. Words are cheap and I'm not going to spend money defending against what you can do for free. So put up or shut up.
Old Feb 7, 2011 | 03:00 PM
  #49  
SOHC24powa's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-10-10
Posts: 545
Likes: 0
From: Gastonia, NC
Originally Posted by ProjectScarab
So then where did the 100hp number come from? There must be a graph that exists somewhere that shows it.
Do you really not know what the average stock ss/tc will put down on a dyno?
Old Feb 7, 2011 | 03:03 PM
  #50  
ProjectScarab's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 12-23-09
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Originally Posted by Zooomer
Tell you what. You point out a claim that we made regarding these cams/heads/tune that you don't believe to be true. I'll put up $1000 against yours and provide the dyno to check on. That way we can both be held acountable to claims. Words are cheap and I'm not going to spend money defending against what you can do for free. So put up or shut up.
I'm not the one that has anything to prove here but if you care to be the first person to post results on this thread, don't let me stop you



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:55 PM.