ZZP Ported Head and S1 Cam Combo Package - debunking thread
Because it gives a baseline of what can be achieved on just a stock platform. What if someone was considering a turbo upgrade and thought this might be a better way to go and save some cash? Knowing that they could build off of it in the future, at least they have a starting point. Is that really an unreasonable request?
I applaud the 400 plus dyno runs that you've made in search of power, I really do. It shows a commitment to the platform that should be celebrated. If only more companies showed us that much love we might be further along in development then we are now.
Not at all. It's already been done if they're making the claims of how much HP a stock motor/stock turbo will make with the upgrade. I'm just asking to see the graphs that support the claims.
"If you’re car is not far from stock and you have a stock tune, this combo will net you approximately 100 horsepower. Much of this comes from the tune where we can increase turbo output."
100 HP is worthless to someone with a stock motor that doesn't want to invest $4K+ on a turbo upgrade?
Because it gives a baseline of what can be achieved on just a stock platform. What if someone was considering a turbo upgrade and thought this might be a better way to go and save some cash? Knowing that they could build off of it in the future, at least they have a starting point. Is that really an unreasonable request?
working. A good dyno number means your parts are working and poor one means they are not. Get it?
If a car puts down 400WHP with the stock turbo, it's clearly got some bad ass parts on it. Do you disagree or not understand this?
Specifically you have an upgraded turbo, ported head, and many mods. 369WHP means your parts are not working. In fact no one has posted such a low dyno number with similar mods.
Matt had a stock turbo with all ZZP parts and did 400+WHP. That means his parts are working better than anyone else.
I share plenty of numbers with others. In fact, I've emailed and PM'd a few people just today with HP estimates for their particular application and how they can plan accordingly.
so you want them to back up their approximation when it is already well established that a tune alone typically given 60-80whp? ...effectively bitching that they aren't providing 'proof' that porting the head and a set of cams will add roughly 30 more horses?
is that really your whole concern here?
edit: i just really dont see why you are doing this. Why not call them? no one here is taking your side on your opinions of what ZZP "should" be doing, so why make it public and take criticism from everyone watching such as myself?
IMO this happens when you try and degrade the reputation of the company that you insist on publicly raising doubts about. Why else would you make a thread on it...so others can see? Seems to me others have been seeing fine, and none are agreeing with your logic
is that really your whole concern here?
edit: i just really dont see why you are doing this. Why not call them? no one here is taking your side on your opinions of what ZZP "should" be doing, so why make it public and take criticism from everyone watching such as myself?
IMO this happens when you try and degrade the reputation of the company that you insist on publicly raising doubts about. Why else would you make a thread on it...so others can see? Seems to me others have been seeing fine, and none are agreeing with your logic
Because it gives a baseline of what can be achieved on just a stock platform. What if someone was considering a turbo upgrade and thought this might be a better way to go and save some cash? Knowing that they could build off of it in the future, at least they have a starting point. Is that really an unreasonable request?
I didn't make that statement. It was made by Kelu actually.
You mean the build I referred to as NOT working right? The build that still has bugs to work out but still put down 403hp/355tq? The build that made those numbers with a hurt turbo? That build? I guess you really are worried about it if you can't stop talking about it.
You mean the build I referred to as NOT working right? The build that still has bugs to work out but still put down 403hp/355tq? The build that made those numbers with a hurt turbo? That build? I guess you really are worried about it if you can't stop talking about it.
You should test with 87 octane because some people like to save money.
So, again we come to this. If the car WASN'T working properly why would you post info to help someone's ported head thread? Clearly it didn't help and the rest is paper racing say what it could do. Back to thread #1 now lol.
Tell you what. You point out a claim that we made regarding these cams/heads/tune that you don't believe to be true. I'll put up $1000 against yours and provide the dyno to check on. That way we can both be held acountable to claims. Words are cheap and I'm not going to spend money defending against what you can do for free. So put up or shut up.
Tell you what. You point out a claim that we made regarding these cams/heads/tune that you don't believe to be true. I'll put up $1000 against yours and provide the dyno to check on. That way we can both be held acountable to claims. Words are cheap and I'm not going to spend money defending against what you can do for free. So put up or shut up.


