3.5" Intake
Joined: 12-30-07
Posts: 14,079
Likes: 197
From: NEPA
Josh it's not against you. Even you have to admit the days are gone when people question "WHY?!?!" and now it is "uh, ok, i buy it now" Instead of looking into how it works and how it will benefit the vehicle.
A is the problem
B is the solution
X is the result
People forget to solve for anything else other than "OMGWTF SHINY!!!!!"
Hell build and intake that transitions from a 4 inch inlet to a 3 inch outlet with a smooth transition, not a stepped and see what happens to flow. Just throwing out idea's.
A is the problem
B is the solution
X is the result
People forget to solve for anything else other than "OMGWTF SHINY!!!!!"
Hell build and intake that transitions from a 4 inch inlet to a 3 inch outlet with a smooth transition, not a stepped and see what happens to flow. Just throwing out idea's.

Joined: 12-30-07
Posts: 14,079
Likes: 197
From: NEPA
2.8 zzp pulley
Siemens 60s
CIA mid length header
3" zzp catless dp
3" zzp catback although I want to go cheaper
Gmpp clutch / resurfaced flywheel/ new tob
Joined: 12-30-07
Posts: 14,079
Likes: 197
From: NEPA
The factory intake with modified airbox will do you just fine with the setup you are looking to do.
Like!
you cant even drive yet ??
LS2 comes with a 90mm TB from the factory and only makes 400 hp at the flywheel. My LS2 has a 92mm TB on it with a 4" intake. Anything smaller would not work.
You could put an 80mm TB and 3" intake on a LS2 and it would not loose any power was my point. A 90mm TB and 4" intake are massive overkill for a motor that moves roughly 500 CFM max. I know they flow tested a ford 80mm TB off a 5.0 Coyote at nearly 1200 CFM.
LS2 with a 3" intake would max the maf sensor and loose hp.
The TVS1320 is capable of more than 824 CFM. It is easier to get all of those cfm by sucking through a bigger opening. That's why the LS4 TB gains hp.
The TVS1900 is capable of more than 1177 CFM. A 90mm TB flows about 1170 CFM.
TB and intake size depend on how much you want to push it.



