damn man. thats a shame. get some cooling mods.
you would actually make more horsepower with a 2.8 and 42lb injectors (if you decided to stay with no cooling mods)

wow. what a noob.

 

on a dyno dynamics, i read somewhere that to get the equivalent to a dynojet you must add 22% onto your numbers...

so let's see...

when all the math is done it's ~287.92 or some **** like that..

 

i was wondering that to . . is that kind of dyno one to read lower or something? if so what would be the correct ?

 

If it's cold out then you will be okay. I would say 270 and 250. Isn't the cold air like having the meth kit? As in keeping it cool.

 

that would be correct. a dynamics reads lower than a mustang dyno would. you go 13% up to get the readings of a mustang dyno, then 22% to get the readings of a dynojet. sounds logical, right?

i put down 220 on a dynamics, rounded up to 269 or something like that and i have 2.9, stage 2, full header back exhaust, intake, ngk's, etc..

with your mods, i'd definately say 288 is close to being the correct # for a dynojet.

 

Dyno Dynamics Dyno's are the lowest ones you can get on.

I got 258 on a DD and that was with no fan's blowing on it and the damn engine shoved in a corner because it was made for RWD vehicles. Either way comparing dyno numbers is retarded in the first place due to all the different corrections and types of dyno's and whatnot. Either way a 2.6" is WAAYY to small for this car and with you having no cooling mods your just asking for trouble. The lean issue isn't what is blowing up cars its the cylinder pressure issue which skyrockets when you have an overdriven blower pouring molten hot air into your cylinders. Also just so you know you can detonate by running too rich just the same as you can by running too lean.

 

i like you logical answer made me happy i just hope thats right

anyother opinions ?

 

I figured it'd be low man... but yeah get some cooling mods go to the same dyno and see what difference it made!

I put down 260 and 241 on a dynojet running a 2.85 bolt ons, tune, and water injection!

 

Other opinions? Sure.

1.get some coolings mods asap.
2. If you dontget some cooling mods.... your motor go KA-BOOM!!!
3.after that then you.

 

but adding the .22 to my numbers puts them at 287 hp and 292 tq my question now is that right haha ?

 

CA H/E is all you need man. As soon as i get mine, i'm either going 2.6 or 2.7 .. Haven't decided yet.

 

its on order ( haha ) but im getting that along with water meth, ported s/c with rebal 3.5 t/b over the winter

i've been running this setup since the end of september and with a winter tune . . its been fine even since and before that i had a 2.7 on there for almost a year

 

you don't have to dump fuel above 6k.

 

is there a correction percent for a dyno dynamics?

 

A dyno number is what It is. You can't really compare dyno slips from different dyno's. It just doesn't work like that. You have to take them for what they are. If you upgrade and use the same dyno then you can see the benefits of what you have done but just as a number they aren't very reliable.

Anyway the number sounds right to me. I would highly doubt if you went to a dyno jet that you would be anywhere near 22% higher. Maybe 2%...

 

thank you

 

That is the type of power I made on my cobalt in 115* weather with a 2.9" and 42s. How much knock was your car getting on the dyno? And you should not add extra fuel to "make up" for #4 piston. That delivers more fuel to the other pistons too, compounding your problem. Just run the proper AFR, whatever you consider that to be.

 

no knock at all maybe 0.3 real quick and it was 38 degrees out

 

with 240 tq, you definately should have more up top.
some tuning could probably stretch you out to about 250-260

 

as soon as i get a little cash im going to re-tune with BCP