View Poll Results: Those who have it. Which is better?
Stage 1 with smaller pulley



18
39.13%
stage 2



28
60.87%
Voters: 46. You may not vote on this poll
GM Stage 1/2 Thread: Merged
Originally Posted by ninja44
If I can wake up in time I'll get the dyno done and when you see what the results are you will all feel like asses for believing the stage kits are weak
I hope you are right.
Originally Posted by ninja44
If I can wake up in time I'll get the dyno done and when you see what the results are you will all feel like asses for believing the stage kits are weak
Anybody monitor the timming when doing the dyno runs? Would like to see how much timming they took out with the reflash. There are a ton of boost limiters built into the ECM that could cause timming to be taken out.
LSX RWD S/C conversion
iTrader: (2)
Joined: 03-25-05
Posts: 10,450
Likes: 277
From: Maple Ridge, BC, Canada
Dyno Sheet
Okay I am ready to post the dyno but background first.
The pull is much better but the numbers don't indicate that actually just the opposite.
Second it was done at the same dyno, same technician BUT this time NO RPM hookup he just based this on wheel speed. I do not know if this makes a difference. Anyone who knows say so quickly for everones sake.
The graph has my previous numbers with the new ones. I am seriously wanting to go else where but this was where I had the previous dyno done. I am very pissed that the tech never told me about the difference in the test from last time(not done on RPM's)
The pull is much better but the numbers don't indicate that actually just the opposite.
Second it was done at the same dyno, same technician BUT this time NO RPM hookup he just based this on wheel speed. I do not know if this makes a difference. Anyone who knows say so quickly for everones sake.
The graph has my previous numbers with the new ones. I am seriously wanting to go else where but this was where I had the previous dyno done. I am very pissed that the tech never told me about the difference in the test from last time(not done on RPM's)
LSX RWD S/C conversion
iTrader: (2)
Joined: 03-25-05
Posts: 10,450
Likes: 277
From: Maple Ridge, BC, Canada
Also when these horrible results came out the A\F ratio was good and I was making almost 5lbs more boost. The tech said it didn't make sense to him. Can we all just hope he's an idiot and did something wrong????????
Originally Posted by victory_red_SS
Also when these horrible results came out the A\F ratio was good and I was making almost 5lbs more boost. The tech said it didn't make sense to him. Can we all just hope he's an idiot and did something wrong????????
What I want to know is how does it feel? Good? Ok? Awesome? So-so? The street tells alot.
LSX RWD S/C conversion
iTrader: (2)
Joined: 03-25-05
Posts: 10,450
Likes: 277
From: Maple Ridge, BC, Canada
Originally Posted by Matty
What I want to know is how does it feel? Good? Ok? Awesome? So-so? The street tells alot.
LSX RWD S/C conversion
iTrader: (2)
Joined: 03-25-05
Posts: 10,450
Likes: 277
From: Maple Ridge, BC, Canada
Originally Posted by phxSS
Never heard of a tech judging when to end the dyno based on "wheelspeed". Sounds like a moron to me.
LSX RWD S/C conversion
iTrader: (2)
Joined: 03-25-05
Posts: 10,450
Likes: 277
From: Maple Ridge, BC, Canada
Originally Posted by ninja44
If I can wake up in time I'll get the dyno done and when you see what the results are you will all feel like asses for believing the stage kits are weak
Originally Posted by victory_red_SS
It feels good not awesome. When it gets to about 3500-4000rpm it pulls good. Thats why the numbers make no sense to me. I just want them to be wrong

Go race someone and tell us the results! (on the track of course
Originally Posted by TheToolmaker
Thanks, but I said nothing about HP besides no way just a 16 HP gain.....
And you DO feel hp.... You need to study Physics....
horsepower = rpm x torque / 5252
^^^^
Torque is used in the equation...
And you DO feel hp.... You need to study Physics....
horsepower = rpm x torque / 5252
^^^^
Torque is used in the equation...
Horsepower/ A unit of power in the U.S. Customary System, equal to 745.7 watts or 33,000 foot-pounds per minute.
Torque/ The moment of a force; the measure of a force's tendency to produce torsion and rotation about an axis, equal to the vector product of the radius vector from the axis of rotation to the point of application of the force and the force vector.
Now which do you think you feel??
Take 2 cars geared exactly the same, same weight, etc. One has 300ft.lbs and 300 hp the other has 300ft.lbs. and 400hp, guess what??? They will FEEL the same when accelerating.
Same scenario 300hp for both and 300ft.lbs and 400 for the other. Guess what the one with 400ft.lbs will FEEL faster and depending on the gearing and weight they might still accelerate the same.
Victorys DYNO
I am still confused how you got your numbers. You say the guy went off of wheel speed. In that case, the car would not be making full power. My car is alot faster in every gear. I saw the Tech2 post the other day and the guy hit 36 mph in first, so if I am understanding this all correctly he stopped way short of redline on your dyno too.
PLEASE CORRECT ME IF I AM WRONG!
PLEASE CORRECT ME IF I AM WRONG!
Originally Posted by 280Z1977
Sue them for what????? I hope you are joking. What did GM say the stage kits would put to the wheels around 250-260whp. What did this guy dyno?
Originally Posted by victory_red_SS
Okay I am ready to post the dyno but background first.
The pull is much better but the numbers don't indicate that actually just the opposite.
Second it was done at the same dyno, same technician BUT this time NO RPM hookup he just based this on wheel speed. I do not know if this makes a difference. Anyone who knows say so quickly for everones sake.
The graph has my previous numbers with the new ones. I am seriously wanting to go else where but this was where I had the previous dyno done. I am very pissed that the tech never told me about the difference in the test from last time(not done on RPM's)

The pull is much better but the numbers don't indicate that actually just the opposite.
Second it was done at the same dyno, same technician BUT this time NO RPM hookup he just based this on wheel speed. I do not know if this makes a difference. Anyone who knows say so quickly for everones sake.
The graph has my previous numbers with the new ones. I am seriously wanting to go else where but this was where I had the previous dyno done. I am very pissed that the tech never told me about the difference in the test from last time(not done on RPM's)
I thought you opened this thread by saying there was a loss of torque ? Also, don't the torque numbers seem low both before and after ?
Originally Posted by 280Z1977
Same scenario 300hp for both and 300ft.lbs and 400 for the other. Guess what the one with 400ft.lbs will FEEL faster and depending on the gearing and weight they might still accelerate the same.
Yes the 400 torque one would feel faster b/c of the fact it has 100 lb more torque. You did not read the equation though.... the one with more torque would have more hp if measured at the same rpm......
Originally Posted by mken
Originally Posted by TheToolmaker
Yes the 400 torque one would feel faster b/c of the fact it has 100 lb more torque. You did not read the equation though.... the one with more torque would have more hp if measured at the same rpm......
This might uncloud your brain... http://vettenet.org/torquehp.html

