2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

GM Stage 1 Hoax?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 6, 2009 | 11:53 AM
  #26  
Staged07SS's Avatar
Administrator
Administrator
Platinum Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: 12-30-07
Posts: 14,079
Likes: 197
From: NEPA
Originally Posted by 2fastSS
your statement about how you need cams to make power at 7 thousand rpms is ridiculous....Idk how long youve been around bud, but my stage 2 car made power up to 6900 rpms....
i agree with u
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2009 | 11:54 AM
  #27  
ebristol's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 04-15-07
Posts: 5,457
Likes: 3
From: WI
Originally Posted by 2fastSS
your statement about how you need cams to make power at 7 thousand rpms is ridiculous....Idk how long youve been around bud, but my stage 2 car made power up to 6900 rpms....
Why don't you look at the graphs I am posting and then make your opinion.

Reply
Old Feb 6, 2009 | 11:56 AM
  #28  
2fastSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-01-06
Posts: 5,263
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
I can tell you from having owned an lsj myself... That the guy either didnt get tuned or he didnt get bumped up to the 7000 rpm rev limiter...

let me give you some more advice, a stock ss/sc vs a stage 2 ss/sc has the advantage of staying in gear longer because of longer rpms making it win by 2 or so cars... If both damn cars shifted at 6500 rpms it would be a dead even race!!!!!!
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2009 | 11:57 AM
  #29  
Staged07SS's Avatar
Administrator
Administrator
Platinum Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: 12-30-07
Posts: 14,079
Likes: 197
From: NEPA
Originally Posted by ebristol
Why don't you look at the graphs I am posting and then make your opinion.

that graph isnt even for a SS/SC ..... 130 some hp ???????

dude give up .... everyone on this site knows the lsj makes good power up to 7000 rpms
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2009 | 12:00 PM
  #30  
2fastSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-01-06
Posts: 5,263
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
and the tune for that car is off too.... the air fuel ratio sucks ass!!!!!!
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2009 | 12:04 PM
  #31  
ebristol's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 04-15-07
Posts: 5,457
Likes: 3
From: WI
More











Even GM shows that power drops off before 7k...


Last edited by ebristol; Feb 6, 2009 at 12:04 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2009 | 12:05 PM
  #32  
2fastSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-01-06
Posts: 5,263
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
where the hell are you getting your **** from?? are these stage 1 graphs or stage 2 graphs from the gm stage 2 tune?? Lol cuz that **** isnt, some of the power curves peak at 5500 rpms... get the **** out of here with that non sense
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2009 | 12:12 PM
  #33  
ebristol's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 04-15-07
Posts: 5,457
Likes: 3
From: WI
Originally Posted by 2fastSS
where the hell are you getting your **** from?? are these stage 1 graphs or stage 2 graphs from the gm stage 2 tune?? Lol cuz that **** isnt, some of the power curves peak at 5500 rpms... get the **** out of here with that non sense
Oh my. Tough words for a big man.

These graphs are from CSS and RLFs. Mostly Stage 2 or custom tuned cars.

So are you saying that there is more hp to made up to 7500rpms. Because it is pretty clear on almost all those graphs that the power starts to die after 6500rpms.



This graph is from GM in their GM Performance Parts book. It is easy to see that the power is falling off before 7k.

Last edited by ebristol; Feb 6, 2009 at 12:12 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2009 | 12:14 PM
  #34  
2fastSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-01-06
Posts: 5,263
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
and its pretty clear that the tune that their giving these people are plain ****!!!! Lol maybe my friend you dont drive an lsj haha, and never had a stage 2 put on your car.... You cant start noticing any difference in the car at all till you peak it to 7000 rpms....
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2009 | 12:22 PM
  #35  
ebristol's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 04-15-07
Posts: 5,457
Likes: 3
From: WI
Originally Posted by 2fastSS
and its pretty clear that the tune that their giving these people are plain ****!!!! Lol maybe my friend you dont drive an lsj haha, and never had a stage 2 put on your car....
That is not true.

I had GMS2 and now have OTTP Stage 1. This is my dyno graph of OTTP Stage 1. I never got my car dyno'd on GMS2.



Do you have any personal dyno graphs you would like to share?

Originally Posted by 2fastSS
You cant start noticing any difference in the car at all till you peak it to 7000 rpms....
That is not true either.

By upping the rev limiter it allows you to stay in the same gear just a little longer. It allows you to take any gear to a higher rpm. Then when you ****, you are shifting into a higher rpm in the next gear. So your power does not fall off as much from gear to gear.

Or the other reason to raise the rev limiter is for better 1/4 mile times. If you are hitting the rev limiter at 7k just before the end of the 1/4 most people will bump the rev limiter to 7200. So they can finish the full 1/4 mile without hitting the rev limiter or shifting into 4th.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2009 | 12:25 PM
  #36  
2fastSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-01-06
Posts: 5,263
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
ok so lets get back to my argument.... The guy who dynod the car if he shifted at 6500 rpms, that would affect his numbers when he could of went to 7,000 rpms?? I believe so
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2009 | 12:27 PM
  #37  
recklessactn's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 08-15-07
Posts: 1,761
Likes: 1
From: NNJ
Originally Posted by recklessactn
peak whp power at 7000 rpms ?



Anyways, isnt the gm stage 1 upgrade in bhp on gm's site?
OK look at my graph..... see it.... read it.... read it again.....

Hmm that looks like a steady power curve that goes right up to 7k rpms where it made peak whp. MODS in sig.

So I guess im a fluke then?
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2009 | 12:34 PM
  #38  
ebristol's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 04-15-07
Posts: 5,457
Likes: 3
From: WI
Originally Posted by 2fastSS
ok so lets get back to my argument.... The guy who dynod the car if he shifted at 6500 rpms, that would affect his numbers when he could of went to 7,000 rpms?? I believe so
It would not have effected the PEAK hp. Maybe if the dyno operator went to 6600 it might have been slightly higher. But as you can see from his dyno post the operator almost went to 7k and the power was dropping off.




Originally Posted by recklessactn
OK look at my graph..... see it.... read it.... read it again.....

Hmm that looks like a steady power curve that goes right up to 7k rpms where it made peak whp. MODS in sig.

So I guess im a fluke then?
You did't go all the way to 7k. Your HP# had already leveled off. If the run would have went all the way to 7k you would have seen your hp drop.

Last edited by ebristol; Feb 6, 2009 at 12:35 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2009 | 12:40 PM
  #39  
2fastSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-01-06
Posts: 5,263
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
you cant go to 7k!!!! lol thats redline bro you shift at 6900 rpms everytime just like that guy did
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2009 | 12:46 PM
  #40  
ebristol's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 04-15-07
Posts: 5,457
Likes: 3
From: WI
Originally Posted by 2fastSS
you cant go to 7k!!!! lol thats redline bro you shift at 6900 rpms everytime just like that guy did
You can go to 6999! lol

I understand what you are saying. There IS power at 7,000rpms. But PEAK power comes before that with the stock blower and stock cams.

Ok. My Final Point.

Area47. I am sure you know who he is. Here is a dyno graph of his car.

Originally Posted by Area47
here ya go kids. the only thing that has changed is the cams, and the air temp/humidity. they are in std for this reason. SAE numbers are sorts of wacky. this is simply a cam stand off.



colors, cams, date that it was done. street numbers, not OMG dyno numbers.
red - gmr - 7/5/08
green - 272 - 2/10/08
blue - stock - 10/27/07

red was 11.6 afr. 20 degree's of timing
green was 12.0 afr 24 degree's.
blue was 12.4 25 degree's of timing.

im aware of the torque differences. there is a reason behind it. timing has a part of it, but the bigger part of it is compression ratio.
Originally Posted by 2fastSS
and its pretty clear that the tune that their giving these people are plain ****!!!! Lol maybe my friend you dont drive an lsj haha, and never had a stage 2 put on your car.... You cant start noticing any difference in the car at all till you peak it to 7000 rpms....
Are you trying to say that Area47 is a bad tuner?
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2009 | 12:51 PM
  #41  
2fastSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-01-06
Posts: 5,263
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
lol again... that car made power up to 6800-6900 rpms
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2009 | 12:52 PM
  #42  
Staged07SS's Avatar
Administrator
Administrator
Platinum Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: 12-30-07
Posts: 14,079
Likes: 197
From: NEPA
Originally Posted by ebristol
You can go to 6999! lol

I understand what you are saying. There IS power at 7,000rpms. But PEAK power comes before that with the stock blower and stock cams.

Ok. My Final Point.

Area47. I am sure you know who he is. Here is a dyno graph of his car.





Are you trying to say that Area47 is a bad tuner?
if u remember your first argument ..... you stated that the lsj doesnt make power after 6500rpm ..... then you are sayin it does make power after 6500rpm ..... get your story straight !!!! final point is .... GM Stage 1 increases the rev limit to 7000 rpm to maintain the usuable power the stock lsj makes after 6500 rpm. that is why they claim 236 crank hp at 6800rpms. understand ?!?
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2009 | 12:52 PM
  #43  
recklessactn's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 08-15-07
Posts: 1,761
Likes: 1
From: NNJ
he went to rev limit which is set to 7k.... i was standing there, 1 pull.

You said you dont make power past 6500? My chart shows that I did and maybe ill re image it and zoom in and show me the level off bc if there is one its not clear at all.

So am I a fluke?
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2009 | 12:56 PM
  #44  
ebristol's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 04-15-07
Posts: 5,457
Likes: 3
From: WI
Originally Posted by 2fastSS
lol again... that car made power up to 6800-6900 rpms
Which? Area's? If so it does make power up to 6800-6900. ON GMR cams!

On the stock cams it was only 6500.

Originally Posted by Staged07SS
if u remember your first argument ..... you stated that the lsj doesnt make power after 6500rpm .....
If you remember your first argument you said that the LSJ makes more power at 7k.

Originally Posted by recklessactn
he went to rev limit which is set to 7k.... i was standing there, 1 pull.

You said you dont make power past 6500? My chart shows that I did and maybe ill re image it and zoom in and show me the level off bc if there is one its not clear at all.

So am I a fluke?
Go to a real dyno.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2009 | 12:57 PM
  #45  
thedubsack85's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-29-06
Posts: 3,110
Likes: 0
From: california
Originally Posted by 2fastSS
lol again... that car made power up to 6800-6900 rpms
well according to GM peak HP stock is right above 5500 RPM.. cause the light's on a stock IRL comp pack ladder tach go off like this peak TQ at 4700 (first light) peak HP about 1K later(second light) and the last light 300 RPM shy of redline.. and if you all think the power is in the top end then why could a stage 2 07 LSJ pull car's on a 2.85 pullied LSJ that was catless with a sold trans mount and custom tuned?? and stage 1 should not shift that power band that much.. no pully upgrade jus a little more agressive tune
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2009 | 01:03 PM
  #46  
Staged07SS's Avatar
Administrator
Administrator
Platinum Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: 12-30-07
Posts: 14,079
Likes: 197
From: NEPA
Originally Posted by ebristol
Which? Area's? If so it does make power up to 6800-6900. ON GMR cams!

On the stock cams it was only 6500.



If you remember your first argument you said that the LSJ makes more power at 7k.



Go to a real dyno.
hmmm nope didn't say that i just checked my posts .... i said what i have been saying the entire time to you ..... the car makes power up to its 7000 rpm rev limit with the stage kits. you claim it doesnt !!!

Originally Posted by thedubsack85
well according to GM peak HP stock is right above 5500 RPM.. cause the light's on a stock IRL comp pack ladder tach go off like this peak TQ at 4700 (first light) peak HP about 1K later(second light) and the last light 300 RPM shy of redline.. and if you all think the power is in the top end then why could a stage 2 07 LSJ pull car's on a 2.85 pullied LSJ that was catless with a sold trans mount and custom tuned?? and stage 1 should not shift that power band that much.. no pully upgrade jus a little more agressive tune
GM rated these cars at 205 hp @ 5600rpm which is not peak power .... a stock SS/SC or IR will make anywhere between 210-215 whp stock usually in the 6000 rpm range. GM underrated the car from the factory.

Last edited by Staged07SS; Feb 6, 2009 at 01:03 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2009 | 01:04 PM
  #47  
theniceguy's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 01-08-09
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: Wisconson
I dynoed on a dyno jet with gm stage 2 and made 250whp with a 2.9 pulley and weapon r race header and full exhaust.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2009 | 01:07 PM
  #48  
ebristol's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 04-15-07
Posts: 5,457
Likes: 3
From: WI
Originally Posted by Staged07SS
hmmm nope didn't say that i just checked my posts .... i said what i have been saying the entire time to you ..... the car makes power up to its 7000 rpm rev limit with the stage kits. you claim it doesnt !!!
No **** it makes power. Do you think I was saying that after 6500 the car shuts off?

It does not make peak power at 7k with the M62 and stock cams.

Originally Posted by thedubsack85
well according to GM peak HP stock is right above 5500 RPM.. cause the light's on a stock IRL comp pack ladder tach go off like this peak TQ at 4700 (first light) peak HP about 1K later(second light) and the last light 300 RPM shy of redline.. and if you all think the power is in the top end then why could a stage 2 07 LSJ pull car's on a 2.85 pullied LSJ that was catless with a sold trans mount and custom tuned?? and stage 1 should not shift that power band that much.. no pully upgrade jus a little more agressive tune
Thanks for the informative post. I needed someone with brains to help me out here! lol

I want one of these guys to go the dyno and spin their engines to 8k! Then they would make some SERIOUS hp!!!

Originally Posted by theniceguy
I dynoed on a dyno jet with gm stage 2 and made 250whp with a 2.9 pulley and weapon r race header and full exhaust.
Where?

Last edited by ebristol; Feb 6, 2009 at 01:07 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2009 | 01:08 PM
  #49  
Rydis's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-22-08
Posts: 5,621
Likes: 0
From: Parrish, FL
So if I get what some are saying (which others seem to disagree) is that a staged cobalt only has increased power with the additoinal HP from 6500 yo 7k?
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2009 | 01:08 PM
  #50  
recklessactn's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 08-15-07
Posts: 1,761
Likes: 1
From: NNJ
Originally Posted by ebristol
If you remember your first argument you said that the LSJ makes more power at 7k.

It does and I showed it?

Originally Posted by ebristol
Go to a real dyno.
Wow attacking a mustang dyno's numbers... priceless

Originally Posted by ebristol
^^^^This statement is false.

Everyone knows that the LSJ does NOT make more hp past 6500 rpms. Unless you are running aftermarket cams or a different power adder. After 6500rpms the hp always drops off.
I think you need to revise your previous postion.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:44 PM.