got tuned friday!
lobe seperation angle.
stock lsj cams have an lsa of 112.5 the hks grind has 110. not sure what the jbp cams are. the more you widen this up {to a degree} the more the cylinder pressure is increased. the more air is being crammed into the cylinder. tightening up the lsa {going smaller} will reduce cylinder pressures.
increasing cylinder pressure isn't going to always increase the power. sometimes there is an adverse effect to both sides of it. going to wide, or going to small.
you get to a point where cramming more air into the motor isn't going to help anything. you have to make it more efficient. case in point m-dubs car. this is a prime example of over filling and under exhausting
stock lsj cams have an lsa of 112.5 the hks grind has 110. not sure what the jbp cams are. the more you widen this up {to a degree} the more the cylinder pressure is increased. the more air is being crammed into the cylinder. tightening up the lsa {going smaller} will reduce cylinder pressures.
increasing cylinder pressure isn't going to always increase the power. sometimes there is an adverse effect to both sides of it. going to wide, or going to small.
you get to a point where cramming more air into the motor isn't going to help anything. you have to make it more efficient. case in point m-dubs car. this is a prime example of over filling and under exhausting
EDIT: DUH...
And how did you figure out that a 112-114 LSA is optimal for this head?
Also, if the head is ported (especially on the exhaust ports), would that effect the ability to raise cylinder pressure and still benefit from it?
And how did you figure out that a 112-114 LSA is optimal for this head?
Also, if the head is ported (especially on the exhaust ports), would that effect the ability to raise cylinder pressure and still benefit from it?
Last edited by Edubs; Jan 17, 2008 at 03:47 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
lobe seperation angle.
stock lsj cams have an lsa of 112.5 the hks grind has 110. not sure what the jbp cams are. the more you widen this up {to a degree} the more the cylinder pressure is increased. the more air is being crammed into the cylinder. tightening up the lsa {going smaller} will reduce cylinder pressures.
increasing cylinder pressure isn't going to always increase the power. sometimes there is an adverse effect to both sides of it. going to wide, or going to small.
you get to a point where cramming more air into the motor isn't going to help anything. you have to make it more efficient. case in point m-dubs car. this is a prime example of over filling and under exhausting
stock lsj cams have an lsa of 112.5 the hks grind has 110. not sure what the jbp cams are. the more you widen this up {to a degree} the more the cylinder pressure is increased. the more air is being crammed into the cylinder. tightening up the lsa {going smaller} will reduce cylinder pressures.
increasing cylinder pressure isn't going to always increase the power. sometimes there is an adverse effect to both sides of it. going to wide, or going to small.
you get to a point where cramming more air into the motor isn't going to help anything. you have to make it more efficient. case in point m-dubs car. this is a prime example of over filling and under exhausting
Squish did you ever call that d00d on the H/E brackets, fur' me?
Actually, looks like you're getting a little rich there at some points. You may benefit from further tuning. I can't tell completly, but it looks like you're dipping into the 10's once or twice...
Damn near it anyways... I'm sure some further tuning could release the potential of the car!
im working with him on a schedule time that i can get my car over there and he can take measurements of it.
optimal on lsa is more or less up to the end user, and what they are doing with the car.
optimal on lsa is more or less up to the end user, and what they are doing with the car.
That seems to be a problem around lately! I know one of the dyno's Area and I go to is a "hearbreaker" the shop owner even says that... I just say it's only calibrated for Hondas
The other seems to be a lot higher but its also newer and has better air flow so I don't know!
I know unless you go to the same dynos each time you'll get different numbers from every one of them!
I know unless you go to the same dynos each time you'll get different numbers from every one of them!
That's the only real reason to go to a dyno anyways. Real performance gains are proven at a track, whether you like to turn or floor it, every state's got a track for you to test what you've really done...
Track and street performance is where you will see your true gains.



