2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

How Many Guys Are Seriously Going Turbo Conversion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-13-2008, 01:23 AM
  #101  
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
ebristol's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-15-07
Location: WI
Posts: 5,464
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by LLAMA
Well the turbo came from you, was I right in the sizing????
Its actually a Garrett 3076 .60 a/r. I took a lot of pics before I sold it to Curt. Honestly, I wish I would have kept it!

And that is actually not a Saab turbo manifold. It was designed by GM for the first Cavi ecotecs. They were going to turbo them but gave up on the project and we ended up with the LSJ.
Old 11-13-2008, 07:21 PM
  #102  
Junior Member
 
LLAMA's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-04-08
Location: Waste Allis Wisconsin
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ebristol
Its actually a Garrett 3076 .60 a/r. I took a lot of pics before I sold it to Curt. Honestly, I wish I would have kept it!

And that is actually not a Saab turbo manifold. It was designed by GM for the first Cavi ecotecs. They were going to turbo them but gave up on the project and we ended up with the LSJ.
i wish it was externally gated. what i have looks alot like the kit from atp turbo. And i believe the manifold had saab stamped on it.
Old 11-13-2008, 07:24 PM
  #103  
Banned
 
D4u2s0t's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-18-05
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 17,838
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Blown 4-banger
I disappointedly raise my hand. Depending on what the tech guys at Turbonetics say, I'm probably gonna be getting either a 60-1, or a GT-K 550. Either way, it'll be a little over 400 whp on 91 shitane. Race gas will make a **** load of power, since I have 9.5:1 compression.
don't all the 2.0's have 9.5:1 compression?
Old 11-13-2008, 07:28 PM
  #104  
Junior Member
 
LLAMA's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-04-08
Location: Waste Allis Wisconsin
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by D4u2s0t
don't all the 2.0's have 9.5:1 compression?
yes but what do 2.4 eco's have. I know 2.2 are 10:1
Old 11-13-2008, 07:30 PM
  #105  
Senior Member
 
ptrblkz24's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-24-05
Location: mt kisco,ny
Posts: 1,095
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by D4u2s0t
don't all the 2.0's have 9.5:1 compression?
Yes they do
Old 11-13-2008, 07:32 PM
  #106  
Senior Member
 
XM15's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-16-06
Location: CT
Posts: 6,298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by D4u2s0t
don't all the 2.0's have 9.5:1 compression?
I guess he's implying that he didn't drop compression at all like on the Hahn build.

Originally Posted by LLAMA
yes but what do 2.4 eco's have. I know 2.2 are 10:1
IIRC the 2.4 has a 10.4:1 cr.
Old 11-13-2008, 07:49 PM
  #107  
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
ebristol's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-15-07
Location: WI
Posts: 5,464
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by LLAMA
i wish it was externally gated. what i have looks alot like the kit from atp turbo. And i believe the manifold had saab stamped on it.
Originally Posted by Twincharged
It is not that hard to make this setup. The manifold was one that GM was going to use on a turbo cavy but they decided not to go that route. The guy who produced them is now stuck with them. They are still somewhat expensive. The turbo is a GT3076R/wg that you can get with the wastegate from ATP turbo. The down pipe was a J tube from a Silvia. There are TONS of these on ebay. Just go up there and look around and see what will fit. The oil feed line can be made up at any hydrolic store. The piping canbe done if you know how or a muffler shop at worst can make it up. Just go from the turbo to the MAF sensor (be sure to flare the pipe up to the MAF diameter as soon as possible. I made a bracket that connects the pipe to the tranny as well. This prevents it from blowing off. I used an axillary rail to feed fuel to the engine only under boost, but I suppose you could just tune in larger factory injectors. Also I used a 3.8" pulley to reduce the supercharger boost. You will need to make the means to fit an idler pulley that will allow this large of a SC pulley. Now for tuning I used the SMT6d to run the extra injectors and stage the 2 boost settings according to the throttle position. More or less the 3/4 TPS will kick the boost controller into high boost. There was some other tuning that I was doing with the SMT6 as well but this could be compensated with a good HP tuners tune. The good thing about my setup is that the majority of it is cast iron so there is very little chance of cracks or leaks. The car runs very strong. It put down 335whp last time it was on the dyno. Since then I added more than 14* of timing so now I see about 18* and I run better air fuel ratios. The car is even stronger now. There is more power in there too. The car pulls right to redline and never falls off. Upgrade the valvetrain and run more RPM, get more HP!!:bananahum
This is from the original owner of the twincharged car.

/thread jack! lol
Old 11-13-2008, 09:25 PM
  #108  
Banned
 
selfinfliction's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-23-05
Location: ky
Posts: 8,032
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by JANNETTYRACING
Just wondering, because there are so may benifits, over supercharging.
140 more reliable hp over stock LSJ, Great fuel economy, Incredible torque rise, Less drag on engine turning S/C, Cooler sound, Anyone else want to add anything?

Plus if your going to run with the LNF it is a No Brainer.
been there and came back to stock so i can trade this heep of **** in for a better car

car only went through a 5 year run, there's not going to be much support for it soon, everyone else will be jumping ship soon enough
Old 11-13-2008, 09:34 PM
  #109  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
elecblue06's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-19-07
Location: newburgh,ny
Posts: 14,911
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by selfinfliction
been there and came back to stock so i can trade this heep of **** in for a better car

car only went through a 5 year run, there's not going to be much support for it soon, everyone else will be jumping ship soon enough
umm have you met the NSRT4?.. the aftermarket for that didn't pick up till that car wasn't made anymore and that car was made for less time ..
Old 11-13-2008, 10:30 PM
  #110  
Banned
 
selfinfliction's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-23-05
Location: ky
Posts: 8,032
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by elecblue06
umm have you met the NSRT4?.. the aftermarket for that didn't pick up till that car wasn't made anymore and that car was made for less time ..
that car had cheap potential, an ss/sc does not. the ss/tc may have a better chance, but without dumping a couple thousand $ into an ss/sc you won't see any decent power
Old 11-13-2008, 10:42 PM
  #111  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
elecblue06's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-19-07
Location: newburgh,ny
Posts: 14,911
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by selfinfliction
that car had cheap potential, an ss/sc does not. the ss/tc may have a better chance, but without dumping a couple thousand $ into an ss/sc you won't see any decent power
blink blink..

it didn't have potential till it wasn't made anymore.. is what my point was.. and 2.8 pulley injectors exhaust tune and nitrous it'll see decent power for a cheaper price.. and the srt4 didn't see great power till you spend a few grand as well
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bigdogstokes16
Complete Cars
10
10-08-2015 10:28 PM
Shane H
Parts
3
09-24-2015 11:07 AM
TylerJHowell
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
34
09-21-2015 06:47 PM
n20saturn
Parts
6
09-21-2015 01:50 AM
Cobe
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
8
09-19-2015 11:04 AM



Quick Reply: How Many Guys Are Seriously Going Turbo Conversion



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:32 PM.