I'm soon 2 be screwed!
My car has a full 10 pt roll cage, more suspenion parts than I'm going to list, sticky 255 40 R17's, it handles GREAT. Many would agree my car looks great, especially with my hood and exterior add ons. 30 mpg, LOL, not gonna happen. But no decent running cobalt is going to get that kinda mileage either. My cd player has an auxillary input, i can plug an ipod right in, thats not exactly a really high end feature there.
Check the 60' again, I don't smoke the tires. And my car is not a drag car, I drive it all the time, and I drive it to and from the track.
I will agree though, this isnt the place to talk about my mustang. My mustang thats faster than every car on this board, (bwahahahaha).
ok im done, seriously.
Check the 60' again, I don't smoke the tires. And my car is not a drag car, I drive it all the time, and I drive it to and from the track.
I will agree though, this isnt the place to talk about my mustang. My mustang thats faster than every car on this board, (bwahahahaha).
ok im done, seriously.
never ever compared this set to anything. I think we are aware were behind quite a few cars. we see there is potential in the motor due to GM's results. I believe were trying to find solutions as well. it is a car that is not old tried and true where you can think of a fool proof recipe to go fast. were working on problems - Heat. Turbo would be the obvious answer but some want to do it with a SC. So this thread gets going.
now you should have clearer head about what were excited about. were making progress to get to our 1/4 times down. how fast will it be really? we dont know. but you can estimate. I did. I estimated I would pull out low 14's with GMS2 since I got 14.7 stock. we all do it. you do it. like you go out to the track and have know Idea what you will run? you do cause you can look at another car, cobalt for cobalt I am talking, or mustang for mustang, and determine what you might run.
that is all were doing. I agree it is harder since this is a first. but at 280HP other cobalts did 12's with DR's and others really close with ST's.
How exactly am I embarassing IONS? I drive a cobalt, and a mustang.
This is exactly what im talking about, youre "low 13's with drag radials" says who?? Just because youve "modded quite a bit", lmao!! 15 psi to 22 psi, holy crap it MUST be faster!! seriously? i think djt81185 is right, its all stickerz and nawz on this board.
I think its funny when people talk smack like "buy this kit, you could be just as fast"
Let me get this out in the open, my car ran a best of 11.97 @ 112.8 mph, best mph on slower et (12.0x) was almost 114. Show me one cobalt on this board thats faster than that. NONE.
I cant believe no one on here will agree that the fact that the fastest cobalt is slower than some run of the mill foxbody is PATHETIC. Its like some alternate ricer dimension youre all stuck in.
This is exactly what im talking about, youre "low 13's with drag radials" says who?? Just because youve "modded quite a bit", lmao!! 15 psi to 22 psi, holy crap it MUST be faster!! seriously? i think djt81185 is right, its all stickerz and nawz on this board.
I think its funny when people talk smack like "buy this kit, you could be just as fast"
Let me get this out in the open, my car ran a best of 11.97 @ 112.8 mph, best mph on slower et (12.0x) was almost 114. Show me one cobalt on this board thats faster than that. NONE.
I cant believe no one on here will agree that the fact that the fastest cobalt is slower than some run of the mill foxbody is PATHETIC. Its like some alternate ricer dimension youre all stuck in.
Oh and I know of a car that is faster than you here, but not out of the hole. FWD 1.8 60', 118mph trap, and the car is on this board. but it is not a Cobalt. Its an SRT4. They have been around a little longer so people have figured out what works plus he knows how to use math, turbo maps, is good at researching his project. it is a daily driver.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZ2YFQ6-iO8
define run of the mill foxbody? and who would not admit to it? I think I missed those posts. and that alternate ricer dimension is called mustangville I guess? I know you already apologized for lumping all of together but man I just dont understand it. WE have a goal - to become fast. what is wrong with that. and if you dont think what has been done here is a possible step forward then just state that, why and do it in a respectful matter. If were so wrong in suspecting the car could actually be pretty fast and do 12's for sure (and we mean at least high 12's) then how can you be so right? we need slips right?
some of you ppl are just fackin stupid. I could care less what it runs in the 1/4 but the last 3 LSJ's that i saw making over 280 whp on DR's ran 12's, high 12's but 12's.
2K5's SS will make more than 300whp currently and hoping to see anywhere from 320-350whp depending on pully/boost.
2K5's SS will make more than 300whp currently and hoping to see anywhere from 320-350whp depending on pully/boost.
Maybe im not making myself clear, I didnt say it WON'T be fast, or COULDN'T be fast, its just not fast now. Ill repeat my first post in this thread, I hope theres a ton left in tuning.
Yet is right victory red, I'd hate to line up against your car when you get it done.
Yet is right victory red, I'd hate to line up against your car when you get it done.
As far as not fast, well it is not tuned, the major obstacle is heat and boost levels. those have been achieved. lets face it. he could burn out the motor very shortly at 22 PSI. no one is claiming victory here, but the attempt to go faster seems to be working out so far.
Slips? Why didnt u change your sig then?
Why arent you listed here:
https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/drag-racing-52/official-cobalt-1-4-mile-list-28685/
Slips or shens
Why arent you listed here:
https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/drag-racing-52/official-cobalt-1-4-mile-list-28685/
Slips or shens
anyway. back on track with this thread.
TWIN SCREW....... Will it be the Turning point in the quest of speed with a Cobalt.
can someone please get sometimes. I want to know it performs as much as the doubters here.
I can undoubtedly say I am faster than 13.9. much faster. But slips, sorry I dont have any. My word will have to sufice.
Last edited by Asphalt Assault; Aug 14, 2007 at 11:40 PM.
I am hoping it puts out a certain amount of performance with stock motor so I can reasonably obtain my goal for HP. I would like to shoot for a minimum of 400HP at the crank and perhaps 500HP at the crank. but I dont want to go to the trouble of building up the tranny. It has been reported that best guess is that the input shaft should be able to handle 450 or 500 or something inbetween. Victory Red SS was letting me know as he was trying to get the tranny built to withstand his project. he has been a great source to figure out my goals.
so if twin screw can reasonably produce 300WHP with exhaust modifications and do it reliably then I feel with a build of the motor my goal can be met. I want to do it with a SC but turbo might be the better way. people making steps like this are helping me in my eventual build. and I thank them for that.
That's ok with me. I will say that this endevour has drained me physically and monitarily, but every time I romp on the car it's all pure bliss for me!
There are not many people that would put in the effort here that the guys at Rebel Auto Worx and myself have put into this kit. Not only am I tuning the kit on my ride and working out the kinks, but I'm also making sure that the kit up to the standards I expect it to be for you guys. We're working on making the instructions more accurate and detailed so everything goes smoothly, and making the modifications necessary to make a reliable and powerful kit. I did not buy my as a finished product, but as a test bed to assist Rebel with this project. There are some minor hiccups we've seen and some kinks to still be worked out, but in the end it'll be a badass product for everyone to enjoy that can scrounge up the funds.
People keep saying that the kit is unreasonable in price, but when you look at all the money I had to spend to get my 2.6" pulley setup to where it was, there was not that much of a difference in price. I mean the damn blower alone goes for around $1500, and then add the machining and aluminum welding that has gone into this kit, and $3000 really isn't a bad price for it all.
There are not many people that would put in the effort here that the guys at Rebel Auto Worx and myself have put into this kit. Not only am I tuning the kit on my ride and working out the kinks, but I'm also making sure that the kit up to the standards I expect it to be for you guys. We're working on making the instructions more accurate and detailed so everything goes smoothly, and making the modifications necessary to make a reliable and powerful kit. I did not buy my as a finished product, but as a test bed to assist Rebel with this project. There are some minor hiccups we've seen and some kinks to still be worked out, but in the end it'll be a badass product for everyone to enjoy that can scrounge up the funds. People keep saying that the kit is unreasonable in price, but when you look at all the money I had to spend to get my 2.6" pulley setup to where it was, there was not that much of a difference in price. I mean the damn blower alone goes for around $1500, and then add the machining and aluminum welding that has gone into this kit, and $3000 really isn't a bad price for it all.
I'll be driving to Florida Sunday actually. I'm going to Eglin AFB near Ft. Walton Beach for two weeks of training, so I'll be cruising around in my free time. If you want to make the trip, I'm sure I'll be free for the most part on the weekends. I'm hoping to take the car if all goes well this week. I'll keep you posted if you'd like. 
Sounds good man im down, too bad I dont have my car but we will work something out, PM me your # and everything and I will give you a call tommorow and see what we can set up but for now im out, gotta work in the morning, L8tr
Now back to the pertinent info in this thread. I just did a quick datalog on my way to lunch. The normal IAT2's were at 126* and at ~7000rpms and 20-22psi it was only at 163*! This is without methanol injection too! Not bad on a 97 degree humid ass day if I do say so myself! Oh and just to let all the nay sayers on efficency know, the car is running 23* of timing without methanol injection and I get 0 knock! Let's see your M62 do that!
I'm right here in North Charleston man. It's about a 1-1.5hour drive for you depending on how fast you drive.
I'll be leaving sunday as I stated, but I'll be back after the 1st. Send me a PM.
Yeah, I was pretty stoked when I saw those results. I can't wait to spray my meth in there on top of that too! Can you say Ice Cold!
I'll be leaving sunday as I stated, but I'll be back after the 1st. Send me a PM.Last edited by 2K5SS/SC?; Aug 15, 2007 at 05:47 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
My stock Ecotec 2.0 S/C'd car will blow the doors off most any Mousestang, drag racing,autocross or roadracing;any venue you would like to choose.BUT,this thread is not about whose car is faster.
2k5ss/sc has boldly gone where others would like to follow,including myself.It is not really about whose the "fastest" or who makes the huge numbers,it's all about making what you have better for YOU.
If this twin screw unit turns out to be a step up from the Eaton blower,and by first glance it appears to be,this will benefit all Ecotec 2.0 s/c owners as it is progress foreward.
2k5ss/sc has boldly gone where others would like to follow,including myself.It is not really about whose the "fastest" or who makes the huge numbers,it's all about making what you have better for YOU.
If this twin screw unit turns out to be a step up from the Eaton blower,and by first glance it appears to be,this will benefit all Ecotec 2.0 s/c owners as it is progress foreward.
My stock Ecotec 2.0 S/C'd car will blow the doors off most any Mousestang, drag racing,autocross or roadracing;any venue you would like to choose.BUT,this thread is not about whose car is faster.
2k5ss/sc has boldly gone where others would like to follow,including myself.It is not really about whose the "fastest" or who makes the huge numbers,it's all about making what you have better for YOU.
If this twin screw unit turns out to be a step up from the Eaton blower,and by first glance it appears to be,this will benefit all Ecotec 2.0 s/c owners as it is progress foreward.
2k5ss/sc has boldly gone where others would like to follow,including myself.It is not really about whose the "fastest" or who makes the huge numbers,it's all about making what you have better for YOU.
If this twin screw unit turns out to be a step up from the Eaton blower,and by first glance it appears to be,this will benefit all Ecotec 2.0 s/c owners as it is progress foreward.
I didnt post slips cause I dont have slips. I didnt give a specific time cause my mods dictate where I should be. not that I am there. sorry for that. I can see how that sounded and that was not my intention to misrepresent. so let me fix it by saying the mods that I have should work out to low 13's based on others experience. I feel I can reproduce those results as I was able to reproduce others results with the GMS2 kit, meaning I can drive. I have that slip. You want to see that?
But I dont claim those times. I dont claim any since the car hasn't been to the track since its swap.
Point is dont make **** up. Until you run it, it is assumed you cant.
Tis All...Still wanna see numbers on this swap tho
you just dont build a 12 second car over night...
Fox body mustangs...incredible performance
http://musclecarclub.com/musclecars/...istory-3.shtml
Most of those stock run about as fast as a Cobalt LT. Have to say though didn't know they made a 4cyl Turbo Mustang
79 was such a good year though:
Performance: 2.3 I4 Turbo: 0-60 in 9.1 seconds, 1/4 mile in 17.4 seconds @ 82 mph. 302 V8: 0-60 in 8.3 seconds, 1/4 mile in 17.0 seconds @ 84.8 mph.
In its defense there were a lot of emissions **** going on at this time.
http://musclecarclub.com/musclecars/...istory-3.shtml
Most of those stock run about as fast as a Cobalt LT. Have to say though didn't know they made a 4cyl Turbo Mustang
79 was such a good year though:
Performance: 2.3 I4 Turbo: 0-60 in 9.1 seconds, 1/4 mile in 17.4 seconds @ 82 mph. 302 V8: 0-60 in 8.3 seconds, 1/4 mile in 17.0 seconds @ 84.8 mph.
In its defense there were a lot of emissions **** going on at this time.
Fox body mustangs...incredible performance
http://musclecarclub.com/musclecars/...istory-3.shtml
Most of those stock run about as fast as a Cobalt LT. Have to say though didn't know they made a 4cyl Turbo Mustang
79 was such a good year though:
Performance: 2.3 I4 Turbo: 0-60 in 9.1 seconds, 1/4 mile in 17.4 seconds @ 82 mph. 302 V8: 0-60 in 8.3 seconds, 1/4 mile in 17.0 seconds @ 84.8 mph.
In its defense there were a lot of emissions **** going on at this time.
http://musclecarclub.com/musclecars/...istory-3.shtml
Most of those stock run about as fast as a Cobalt LT. Have to say though didn't know they made a 4cyl Turbo Mustang
79 was such a good year though:
Performance: 2.3 I4 Turbo: 0-60 in 9.1 seconds, 1/4 mile in 17.4 seconds @ 82 mph. 302 V8: 0-60 in 8.3 seconds, 1/4 mile in 17.0 seconds @ 84.8 mph.
In its defense there were a lot of emissions **** going on at this time.
My stock Ecotec 2.0 S/C'd car will blow the doors off most any Mousestang, drag racing,autocross or roadracing;any venue you would like to choose.BUT,this thread is not about whose car is faster.
2k5ss/sc has boldly gone where others would like to follow,including myself.It is not really about whose the "fastest" or who makes the huge numbers,it's all about making what you have better for YOU.
If this twin screw unit turns out to be a step up from the Eaton blower,and by first glance it appears to be,this will benefit all Ecotec 2.0 s/c owners as it is progress foreward.
2k5ss/sc has boldly gone where others would like to follow,including myself.It is not really about whose the "fastest" or who makes the huge numbers,it's all about making what you have better for YOU.
If this twin screw unit turns out to be a step up from the Eaton blower,and by first glance it appears to be,this will benefit all Ecotec 2.0 s/c owners as it is progress foreward.



