2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

New Intake Manifold Development Thread!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 20, 2008 | 02:05 PM
  #51  
IamTvor's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 09-03-07
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
From: Hebron, IN
I cant wait to check this manifold out.
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2008 | 02:23 PM
  #52  
Edubs's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-01-06
Posts: 4,976
Likes: 2
From: West Coast, FL
Glad to see your project is coming along. Can't wait to see prototype information. This will be extremely beneficial for us guys running smaller pulley's on the M62 or TVS plans...
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2008 | 02:58 PM
  #53  
Speedytec's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 11-19-07
Posts: 411
Likes: 1
From: -
Originally Posted by Omega_5
Well... thanks to Witt, it has come to my attention that the stock TMAP position will interfere with the TVS blower. So... it will probably be moved to another common position... possibly the bottom of the unit.
The TMAP in it's original location will only measure cilinder 1 in your new design, correct?
Best location should be somewhere in the mutual airflow of all cilinders, so just after the cooler...

For good flow this bypass channel is exactly in the wrong spot. Off course the routing can be changed with some angles and tube, but still.. Was also looking in the flow direction of the SC outlet. We want this to flow more to cilinder 4, so what if the complete SC is slided a little to the driver side? Then maybe the bypass also clears. Only problem... The pulley.. This should then be offset the equal amount in the other direction.. But this means extra load (Belt force x distance) on the bearings...

Thinking out loud on this... If the runners were angled a little to the passenger side. This way you can achieve the same effect without the pulley problem... (a bit hard to explain here.)
But then maybe there are clearing issues with the alternator???
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2008 | 03:05 PM
  #54  
Omega_5's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-01-06
Posts: 5,134
Likes: 0
From: Maidstone, SK
Originally Posted by Speedytec
The TMAP in it's original location will only measure cilinder 1 in your new design, correct?
Best location should be somewhere in the mutual airflow of all cilinders, so just after the cooler...

For good flow this bypass channel is exactly in the wrong spot. Off course the routing can be changed with some angles and tube, but still.. Was also looking in the flow direction of the SC outlet. We want this to flow more to cilinder 4, so what if the complete SC is slided a little to the driver side? Then maybe the bypass also clears. Only problem... The pulley.. This should then be offset the equal amount in the other direction.. But this means extra load (Belt force x distance) on the bearings...

Thinking out loud on this... If the runners were angled a little to the passenger side. This way you can achieve the same effect without the pulley problem... (a bit hard to explain here.)
But then maybe there are clearing issues with the alternator???
Well... I'm planning to shift the manifold over about .75" to the passenger side to accommodate the blower a few things, as well as move the major flow are to the center of the pre-core plenum. As far as the runners, I'm trying to keep them as straight as possible. Hopefully by moving the whole manifold over, it should save us some grief.
Also, the addition of flow directors in and out of the cores should keep the flow as even as possible.

The T-MAP will probably be located on the bottom of the manifold, in the post-core plenum, so it can read the average pressure and temperature of the air (i will have to check with my contact at Bosch to see if this is a good idea).
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2008 | 03:29 PM
  #55  
Speedytec's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 11-19-07
Posts: 411
Likes: 1
From: -
That is a very common position for such a TMAP sensor. Should be ok as it will measure the average of all cilinders.
(Also, when positioned in a "fast moving air channel" like a runner, it will read a lower pressure just due to the airspeed...)

Keep up the good work and show us that the M62 is not that bad.
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2008 | 04:17 PM
  #56  
Pully Police's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-05-06
Posts: 727
Likes: 0
From: Kakabeka Falls, Ontario
Speedy / Omega:

I just got home from work and read through both your suggestions and ideas - i had a bunch of comments to post - but it looks like you have addressed pretty much all of my concerns - and YES a flat-milled spot for Meth, nitrous, etc would kick ass!

Keep it up - this is, dare I say, MORE exciting than the TVS threads!
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2008 | 04:20 PM
  #57  
Omega_5's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-01-06
Posts: 5,134
Likes: 0
From: Maidstone, SK
Originally Posted by Pully Police
Speedy / Omega:

I just got home from work and read through both your suggestions and ideas - i had a bunch of comments to post - but it looks like you have addressed pretty much all of my concerns - and YES a flat-milled spot for Meth, nitrous, etc would kick ass!

Keep it up - this is, dare I say, MORE exciting than the TVS threads!
Cool...
If your spraying already... so you spray before or after the cores?
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2008 | 04:42 PM
  #58  
Pully Police's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-05-06
Posts: 727
Likes: 0
From: Kakabeka Falls, Ontario
No, I am not spraying - BUT, I would spray Nitrous (wet shot) AFTER the cores.

I would spray METH before the throttle OR before the cores and as close to the SC outlet as possible so the meth could evaporate and mix with the air in the plenum.
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2008 | 04:52 PM
  #59  
Omega_5's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-01-06
Posts: 5,134
Likes: 0
From: Maidstone, SK
Originally Posted by Pully Police
No, I am not spraying - BUT, I would spray Nitrous (wet shot) AFTER the cores.

I would spray METH before the throttle OR before the cores and as close to the SC outlet as possible so the meth could evaporate and mix with the air in the plenum.
Hmmm...
I'll look into how hard it would be to put in a face milled area on both sides of the cores.
I know the bottom won't be a problem, but the top might require an aluminum blank to be welded in to build thinkness, then milled to be at the right angle.
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2008 | 06:08 PM
  #60  
Try2k's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-26-06
Posts: 742
Likes: 0
From: Austin, Texas
If this happens you can count me in for one as well...
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2008 | 10:05 PM
  #61  
Pully Police's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-05-06
Posts: 727
Likes: 0
From: Kakabeka Falls, Ontario
bump
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2008 | 02:34 PM
  #62  
Deathscythe's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-28-06
Posts: 4,994
Likes: 0
From: Waldorf, MD
just waitin' on you mega'
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2008 | 11:34 PM
  #63  
Omega_5's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-01-06
Posts: 5,134
Likes: 0
From: Maidstone, SK
Whew... I'm back from picking up my bike...
Coldest effin ride ever... ( -6*C for 3 hours... ouch!)

Anyways... I have the 3 designs finalized.
I'll be modeling the internals tomorrow, as I have the shell already modeled up.

Hopefully I can have something nailed down by late Monday, or Tuesday.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2008 | 01:39 AM
  #64  
USMCFieldMP's Avatar
Rattlesnake Race Shop
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 06-08-06
Posts: 15,725
Likes: 410
From: Fort Worth, TX
Sweet... after taking off my Supercharger and looking at the stock intercooler... I will DEFINITELY be getting this.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2008 | 01:55 AM
  #65  
Omega_5's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-01-06
Posts: 5,134
Likes: 0
From: Maidstone, SK
Posted a few pics of the stock IM in the 3rd post, 1st page.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2008 | 08:34 AM
  #66  
Edubs's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-01-06
Posts: 4,976
Likes: 2
From: West Coast, FL
I love it when people get to cut apart and gut perfectly good parts for R&D.

Thanks for the sacrifice Omega!
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2008 | 01:50 PM
  #67  
burntorange's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-13-06
Posts: 828
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio
You can also count me in for one of these manifolds. I want it for my turbo build.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2008 | 02:03 PM
  #68  
quadracer0387's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-15-07
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, Ohio
subscibed.... very interested
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2008 | 11:33 PM
  #69  
Omega_5's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-01-06
Posts: 5,134
Likes: 0
From: Maidstone, SK
Sorry guys... I've been sick as hell for the past few days...
It might be a day or two before I have something visual...
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2008 | 05:58 AM
  #70  
USMCFieldMP's Avatar
Rattlesnake Race Shop
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 06-08-06
Posts: 15,725
Likes: 410
From: Fort Worth, TX
Originally Posted by burntorange
You can also count me in for one of these manifolds. I want it for my turbo build.
Are you serious? If you are doing a Turbo Build... then SCREW that style Intake Mani. Get the Hahn IM or the Saab Intake Mani... and run an ACTUAL Intercooler.
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2008 | 08:01 AM
  #71  
Pully Police's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-05-06
Posts: 727
Likes: 0
From: Kakabeka Falls, Ontario
Originally Posted by Omega_5
Sorry guys... I've been sick as hell for the past few days...
It might be a day or two before I have something visual...
No Prob, Omega.

I dont have much money right now anyways....so I can defiately afford to wait

Keep pluggin away - PM me if there is anything you think I could help you with if needed.
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2008 | 09:14 AM
  #72  
burntorange's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-13-06
Posts: 828
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio
Originally Posted by USMCFieldMP
Are you serious? If you are doing a Turbo Build... then SCREW that style Intake Mani. Get the Hahn IM or the Saab Intake Mani... and run an ACTUAL Intercooler.


Na, that is too much for my setup and I already have a CHE and the dual pass, and it should help for less lag....and I don't plan on making like 400+ to the ground...Maybe just 350 and I will be content. The stock cooling system is more than adequite to handle this while still retaining its DD status.
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2008 | 11:00 AM
  #73  
Omega_5's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-01-06
Posts: 5,134
Likes: 0
From: Maidstone, SK
Does anyone happen to know where I can find the GM drawing for the Ecotec intake flange?
I already have one modeled up, but I would like to have the actual specs and tolerances that GM uses, for QA reasons.
For now, it won't affect the design process... but i figured it's best to ask now, instead of waiting until the end.
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2008 | 11:07 AM
  #74  
Witt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-03-06
Posts: 4,958
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Originally Posted by Omega_5
Does anyone happen to know where I can find the GM drawing for the Ecotec intake flange?
I already have one modeled up, but I would like to have the actual specs and tolerances that GM uses, for QA reasons.
For now, it won't affect the design process... but i figured it's best to ask now, instead of waiting until the end.
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2008 | 11:13 AM
  #75  
Scythe_Snake's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-24-06
Posts: 7,856
Likes: 21
From: Matteson, Illinois
Omega, let me be one of the many to thank you for this. I know I would have had a hell of a time with this one as it would be in my plans. Thanks for making a part that increases efficiency and doesn't just "add a billion hp". You are appreciate. All that said....

SUBSCRIBED FOR PICS!!!
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:13 PM.