New Intake Manifold Development Thread!!!
Wow.... Witt, that's awesome! Thanks! 
Scythe... thanks for the comment.
Pics will be coming...
My head still feels like a beach ball today, but I'm still slugging away at it... being sick is one part of spring that I hate!
Scythe... thanks for the comment.
Pics will be coming...
My head still feels like a beach ball today, but I'm still slugging away at it... being sick is one part of spring that I hate!

Get better...then get to work on that. =p
The test unit is going to be a mess of wires and sensors!
I'll be logging pre and post core air temps and pressures, as well as inlet and outlet water temps.
From that I can determine efficiency, heat transfer rate, heat soak, boost latency, and all kind of other goodies!
That's something I should point out now!
The test unit is going to be a mess of wires and sensors!
I'll be logging pre and post core air temps and pressures, as well as inlet and outlet water temps.
From that I can determine efficiency, heat transfer rate, heat soak, boost latency, and all kind of other goodies!
The test unit is going to be a mess of wires and sensors!
I'll be logging pre and post core air temps and pressures, as well as inlet and outlet water temps.
From that I can determine efficiency, heat transfer rate, heat soak, boost latency, and all kind of other goodies!
Keep it up - dont let people rush you - you have a good bunch of supporters in this thread who will gladly run interference for you if/when people start bitching
P.S. This is not a polite jab at getting you to not threadjack - I am just letting you know as there are a bunch of really good technical drawings in those pdf's
I think that if you go to GM tunersource, all the engine technical drawings are in the build book pdf's.
P.S. This is not a polite jab at getting you to not threadjack - I am just letting you know as there are a bunch of really good technical drawings in those pdf's
P.S. This is not a polite jab at getting you to not threadjack - I am just letting you know as there are a bunch of really good technical drawings in those pdf's

I think that if you go to GM tunersource, all the engine technical drawings are in the build book pdf's.
P.S. This is not a polite jab at getting you to not threadjack - I am just letting you know as there are a bunch of really good technical drawings in those pdf's
P.S. This is not a polite jab at getting you to not threadjack - I am just letting you know as there are a bunch of really good technical drawings in those pdf's

Well... I found the document your refering too...
http://tunersource.gmblogs.com/Racer...06appendix.pdf
All I can say it... holy jeezus...
http://tunersource.gmblogs.com/Racer...06appendix.pdf
All I can say it... holy jeezus...
Well... I found the document your refering too...
http://tunersource.gmblogs.com/Racer...06appendix.pdf
All I can say it... holy jeezus...
http://tunersource.gmblogs.com/Racer...06appendix.pdf
All I can say it... holy jeezus...
Lots of crap to take in

Right from GM - Crank is good to 500+ hp, rods are good to 450 hp, the stock head can make 400hp as it is, the block will go as far as you want s long as you replace the cylinder liners which are good to about 400-450 hp, and the valves can handle a crapload also.
Yeah - just pistons, maybe a bit of porting, and valve springs. I would also get some adjustable cam gears as NO ONE makes a direct fit cam in the LSJ unless you want to run a smaller base circle - which I dont want to do 
Right from GM - Crank is good to 500+ hp, rods are good to 450 hp, the stock head can make 400hp as it is, the block will go as far as you want s long as you replace the cylinder liners which are good to about 400-450 hp, and the valves can handle a crapload also.

Right from GM - Crank is good to 500+ hp, rods are good to 450 hp, the stock head can make 400hp as it is, the block will go as far as you want s long as you replace the cylinder liners which are good to about 400-450 hp, and the valves can handle a crapload also.
In the original GM test build of the ecotec, the stock sleeves didn't fail until 750 hp.
Well, yesterday was the first day I got to work on it (not feeling so hot lately). And it ended up that I had a set back with the design.
My initial 2D CAD layout didn't quite do justice as to how tight of a fit it is on the head side.
So... now I have to tweak the core positions again to fit in the runners.
As soon as I get a design that I'm satisfied I can run though a simulation, I'll post a screen shot.
I just don't want to post a picture of something that isn't feasible.
My initial 2D CAD layout didn't quite do justice as to how tight of a fit it is on the head side.
So... now I have to tweak the core positions again to fit in the runners.
As soon as I get a design that I'm satisfied I can run though a simulation, I'll post a screen shot.
I just don't want to post a picture of something that isn't feasible.
...here is the million dollar question: Do the L61 and LSJ have the same Cylinder liners??
Well, yesterday was the first day I got to work on it (not feeling so hot lately). And it ended up that I had a set back with the design.
My initial 2D CAD layout didn't quite do justice as to how tight of a fit it is on the head side.
So... now I have to tweak the core positions again to fit in the runners.
As soon as I get a design that I'm satisfied I can run though a simulation, I'll post a screen shot.
I just don't want to post a picture of something that isn't feasible.
My initial 2D CAD layout didn't quite do justice as to how tight of a fit it is on the head side.
So... now I have to tweak the core positions again to fit in the runners.
As soon as I get a design that I'm satisfied I can run though a simulation, I'll post a screen shot.
I just don't want to post a picture of something that isn't feasible.
Last edited by Pully Police; Mar 28, 2008 at 09:26 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost



