Official TVS Thread!!!
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
anyone care to post some pictures of how their opt b 3/4" hose is routed form the tank to the T fitting ?
with the TVS there is no room at all to run it by the pulley ..
running it through the tie bar seems like it would make a high point and fluid would not flow past that point.
just looking for some ideas ... right now mine is down under the washer fluid reservoir and its too low for the fluid to come back up to the T fitting.
with the TVS there is no room at all to run it by the pulley ..
running it through the tie bar seems like it would make a high point and fluid would not flow past that point.
just looking for some ideas ... right now mine is down under the washer fluid reservoir and its too low for the fluid to come back up to the T fitting.
Slobodan Milošević
iTrader: (8)
Looks like this thread hasn't gotten much love lately
As long as the fluid level in the option B res is higher than the highest point of the feed line (it should be the highest point in the system already anyway), fluid will come out the other end. A low loop might create more of an air bubble than a smaller loop, but it will bleed out over time along with the rest of the air in the system. depending on how the rest of the system is plumbed, this could happen really quickly, or not so much.
~~~~~
Road-tripped to the ARMperformance dyno day yesterday, and got on the rollers again. Since my last pass (SAE:416/300, STd:424/306), I have:
-more timing mid-range with a hair more peak
-400rpm higher redline (8150 from 7750)
-ditched the zzp catback with the two chambered mufflers and replaced it with straight through borlas with a side exit.
SAE:
STD:
anyone care to post some pictures of how their opt b 3/4" hose is routed form the tank to the T fitting ?
with the TVS there is no room at all to run it by the pulley ..
running it through the tie bar seems like it would make a high point and fluid would not flow past that point.
just looking for some ideas ... right now mine is down under the washer fluid reservoir and its too low for the fluid to come back up to the T fitting.
with the TVS there is no room at all to run it by the pulley ..
running it through the tie bar seems like it would make a high point and fluid would not flow past that point.
just looking for some ideas ... right now mine is down under the washer fluid reservoir and its too low for the fluid to come back up to the T fitting.
~~~~~
Road-tripped to the ARMperformance dyno day yesterday, and got on the rollers again. Since my last pass (SAE:416/300, STd:424/306), I have:
-more timing mid-range with a hair more peak
-400rpm higher redline (8150 from 7750)
-ditched the zzp catback with the two chambered mufflers and replaced it with straight through borlas with a side exit.
SAE:
STD:
anyone care to post some pictures of how their opt b 3/4" hose is routed form the tank to the T fitting ?
with the TVS there is no room at all to run it by the pulley ..
running it through the tie bar seems like it would make a high point and fluid would not flow past that point.
just looking for some ideas ... right now mine is down under the washer fluid reservoir and its too low for the fluid to come back up to the T fitting.
with the TVS there is no room at all to run it by the pulley ..
running it through the tie bar seems like it would make a high point and fluid would not flow past that point.
just looking for some ideas ... right now mine is down under the washer fluid reservoir and its too low for the fluid to come back up to the T fitting.
Former Vendor
iTrader: (4)
Fixed it for you.
Looks like this thread hasn't gotten much love lately
As long as the fluid level in the option B res is higher than the highest point of the feed line (it should be the highest point in the system already anyway), fluid will come out the other end. A low loop might create more of an air bubble than a smaller loop, but it will bleed out over time along with the rest of the air in the system. depending on how the rest of the system is plumbed, this could happen really quickly, or not so much.
~~~~~
Road-tripped to the ARMperformance dyno day yesterday, and got on the rollers again. Since my last pass (SAE:416/300, STd:424/306), I have:
-more timing mid-range with a hair more peak
-400rpm higher redline (8150 from 7750)
-ditched the zzp catback with the two chambered mufflers and replaced it with custom loud as hell fire breathing dragon exhaust.
SAE:
STD:
As long as the fluid level in the option B res is higher than the highest point of the feed line (it should be the highest point in the system already anyway), fluid will come out the other end. A low loop might create more of an air bubble than a smaller loop, but it will bleed out over time along with the rest of the air in the system. depending on how the rest of the system is plumbed, this could happen really quickly, or not so much.
~~~~~
Road-tripped to the ARMperformance dyno day yesterday, and got on the rollers again. Since my last pass (SAE:416/300, STd:424/306), I have:
-more timing mid-range with a hair more peak
-400rpm higher redline (8150 from 7750)
-ditched the zzp catback with the two chambered mufflers and replaced it with custom loud as hell fire breathing dragon exhaust.
SAE:
STD:
Former Vendor
iTrader: (4)
Slobodan Milošević
iTrader: (8)
3". I have a side dump now and i'm pretty positive that net me significant power over the zzp with the 2 massive chambered mufflers.
the only changes from my 424 pull were 2* midrange and 1* up top, 400 more rpm, and the straight through exhaust setup.
the only changes from my 424 pull were 2* midrange and 1* up top, 400 more rpm, and the straight through exhaust setup.
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
Borla's design looks much better for flow.
Crazy what a difference +.2 Liters and one size down on the pulley makes.
Slobodan Milošević
iTrader: (8)
I could probably squeeze a bit more out with more timing, but its proven to be fairly stout. I would like to keep it that way
Did you guys ever do the exhaust size testing like you planned? I still think the 2.25" held back your numbers
Did you guys ever do the exhaust size testing like you planned? I still think the 2.25" held back your numbers
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
We have a 2.5 and a 3" Borla cat-back ready to go for the next round of dyno sessions.
The 2.25" borla cat-back was able to carry hp up to 8400 rpm.
There were a couple untouched areas left in the tune as well.
Sub 11 AFR and 3-4 degrees left in the meat of the torque band.
Still on the table
We have a 2.5 and a 3" Borla cat-back ready to go for the next round of dyno sessions.
The 2.25" borla cat-back was able to carry hp up to 8400 rpm.
There were a couple untouched areas left in the tune as well.
Sub 11 AFR and 3-4 degrees left in the meat of the torque band.
We have a 2.5 and a 3" Borla cat-back ready to go for the next round of dyno sessions.
The 2.25" borla cat-back was able to carry hp up to 8400 rpm.
There were a couple untouched areas left in the tune as well.
Sub 11 AFR and 3-4 degrees left in the meat of the torque band.
remember mike has rod ratio on his side also. the 2.2 rod is a lot longer than a LSJ rod. engine runs much more freely.
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)