2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

Official TVS Thread!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 29, 2012 | 11:09 PM
  #1701  
Area47's Avatar
Rent me! per hour
 
Joined: 03-22-07
Posts: 24,161
Likes: 20
From: Still fixing others mistakes.
i had zero problems with my built motor and id1k's.

then again, i was the test car for the rest of the population for these things. if the o-ring on the base of the injector, {on the stainless part} is too small, you will have an issue.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2012 | 02:15 AM
  #1702  
InfraRedline's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 08-22-08
Posts: 7,177
Likes: 6
From: Alpharetta, GA
I ran the id1k's for over a year on some hacked up scalings I made based on the 79# scaling last year (Area you might remember pointing me in the right direction in a PM 2 winters ago.) It wasnt until I used the scalings from Paul Yaw that I had the idle issues. I could switch back to my old maps and the car would idle like a dream, then switch back to the new and it would pull timing and idle up. The car certainly ran MUCH better on Pauls scalings, but the idle annoyed me. Figured out that setting the TB scaler to 4000 or above cured the overspeed. Not 3999, but right at 4000 it disabled it it seemed. Car ran smooth, I added timing to coastdown, changed DFCO settings, called it good enough lol Im lazy
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2012 | 09:58 AM
  #1703  
mrbelvedere's Avatar
Super Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-03-05
Posts: 8,090
Likes: 52
From: KY
Originally Posted by zrated89
john i did a smoke test, along with the carb check, so if i had a leak i would have found it by now.

also did her first compression test. Cyl 1#220 cyl 2#218 cyl 3#219 and cyl 4# 222. This is at 300 miles
that will rule out a timing issue although i checked that before i put everything back together, and uve got to be a dumb ass to not be able to time this motor
thats what i thought also but a friend suggested a boost leak test and when i did that. that is when i found my leaks
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2012 | 10:41 AM
  #1704  
ebristol's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 04-15-07
Posts: 5,457
Likes: 3
From: WI
Originally Posted by zrated89
john i did a smoke test, along with the carb check, so if i had a leak i would have found it by now.

also did her first compression test. Cyl 1#220 cyl 2#218 cyl 3#219 and cyl 4# 222. This is at 300 miles
that will rule out a timing issue although i checked that before i put everything back together, and uve got to be a dumb ass to not be able to time this motor
Are you running a BRFPS or RSFS?
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2012 | 11:31 AM
  #1705  
zrated89's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: 10-01-07
Posts: 4,184
Likes: 1
From: newportnews va
Oring issue is fine on the injectors. I even doubled the orings on the base so it wasn't an issue. It's just tuning them to idle right now. The car wont cut off but on an abrupt stop idle will hunt a bit before she smooths out again. Joe has found some insight into tuning our dumb ass computer with tables we cannot use or arent there. That's why everyone is resorting to the scaler for idle. Shell idle perfect when done.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2012 | 11:32 AM
  #1706  
zrated89's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: 10-01-07
Posts: 4,184
Likes: 1
From: newportnews va
Originally Posted by ebristol
Are you running a BRFPS or RSFS?
Nope no need so far my stock 07 pump is keeping up just fine on e and the 1000s

Although my aem wideband decided to freeze on me yesterday and I just replaced the dam sensor 6 months ago
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2012 | 11:35 AM
  #1707  
zrated89's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: 10-01-07
Posts: 4,184
Likes: 1
From: newportnews va
Originally Posted by InfraRedline
I ran the id1k's for over a year on some hacked up scalings I made based on the 79# scaling last year (Area you might remember pointing me in the right direction in a PM 2 winters ago.) It wasnt until I used the scalings from Paul Yaw that I had the idle issues. I could switch back to my old maps and the car would idle like a dream, then switch back to the new and it would pull timing and idle up. The car certainly ran MUCH better on Pauls scalings, but the idle annoyed me. Figured out that setting the TB scaler to 4000 or above cured the overspeed. Not 3999, but right at 4000 it disabled it it seemed. Car ran smooth, I added timing to coastdown, changed DFCO settings, called it good enough lol Im lazy
We found some insight to the scaler and ill give u a hint, its not raising it

Originally Posted by Area47
i had zero problems with my built motor and id1k's.

then again, i was the test car for the rest of the population for these things. if the o-ring on the base of the injector, {on the stainless part} is too small, you will have an issue.
U also weren't running cams at that point either

Last edited by zrated89; Aug 30, 2012 at 11:35 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2012 | 11:48 AM
  #1708  
armcclure's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 01-10-11
Posts: 3,881
Likes: 20
Well help please lol

Every other gm pcm has integral AND derivative idle controls which would be amazing for us.

I've ran my scalar clear up to 6500 before with hardly any difference.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2012 | 12:12 PM
  #1709  
ebristol's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 04-15-07
Posts: 5,457
Likes: 3
From: WI
Originally Posted by zrated89
Nope no need so far my stock 07 pump is keeping up just fine on e and the 1000s
Well my question had nothing to do with providing enough fueling at WOT. But since you know everything I will just keep my suggestions to myself.

Meanwhile, I can get my 80s to idle like this.

80s Idle - YouTube

And 98# injectors are supposed to idle so much better then 80s...
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2012 | 12:43 PM
  #1710  
zrated89's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: 10-01-07
Posts: 4,184
Likes: 1
From: newportnews va
My 80s idled like butter as well. A lot has changed in my setup not just the idc 1000s. Not claiming to no it all just think its funny everyone believes they need a brfs or a return setup that is not the case. If i were an 05 with a weaker pump I'd be worried but im not
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2012 | 12:46 PM
  #1711  
zrated89's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: 10-01-07
Posts: 4,184
Likes: 1
From: newportnews va
An they are supposed to be easier to get to idle due to the pulse width flooring not the injectors themselves. My issue is now even at idle my car is flowing much more cfms than the old setup. We need to tune for that but considering ee dont have advanced computers with more tables available well have ti tune around it with what limited tables we can change
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2012 | 01:09 PM
  #1712  
ebristol's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 04-15-07
Posts: 5,457
Likes: 3
From: WI
My point is...it would be easier to get them to idle better by lowering your FP at idle. It has nothing to do with the year of your pump and how much fuel it can supply.

I think its funny how everyone is rushing to 98# injectors when they are not necessary. You should got a RSFS and kept your 80s.

But I know it sounds cool to have injectors measured in CCs since the past 8 years this platform has been using pounds like a bunch of dopes.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2012 | 01:16 PM
  #1713  
zrated89's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: 10-01-07
Posts: 4,184
Likes: 1
From: newportnews va
We've also considered doing that as well. If we can't get them to idle the way they should, then ill go that route. Only reason i really went with the 1000s is i got a killer deal on them. And on my old setup with meth my idc was already pretty high
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2012 | 02:14 PM
  #1714  
armcclure's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 01-10-11
Posts: 3,881
Likes: 20
I went with the 1000's because i know i had big plans, and there were ppl maxing out the 80's already.
Yes you could just keep cranking up the pressure, but that would negate the benefit of low pressure at idle.
Plus, injectors can only operate correctly up to a certain pressure. Not sure what that limit is on the 80's but id's can take up to lmost 100 iirc.

Having a base at 43ish and dropping lower in vac helps the
Idle, and at that base i hit idc's in the low 80's on a cool day.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2012 | 03:04 PM
  #1715  
zrated89's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: 10-01-07
Posts: 4,184
Likes: 1
From: newportnews va
my issue isnt a fueling issue anyways. The 1000s will be fine. Bryan never ran a brfs or any of that either there are ways to get around it.
and by the time i bought that other stuff it was cheaper for the injectors anyways
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2012 | 03:15 PM
  #1716  
ebristol's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 04-15-07
Posts: 5,457
Likes: 3
From: WI
Originally Posted by armcclure
I went with the 1000's because i know i had big plans, and there were ppl maxing out the 80's already.
Yes you could just keep cranking up the pressure, but that would negate the benefit of low pressure at idle.
Good point about the negating the benefits of low preasure at idle.

But it should be noted that on ZZP first 2.3L stroker where they made 357whp? they were running 60# injectors with FP around 75psi at WOT. So displacement aside, power can be made by cranking up the FP.

Originally Posted by zrated89
my issue isnt a fueling issue anyways. The 1000s will be fine. Bryan never ran a brfs or any of that either there are ways to get around it.
Bryan as in Area47?

Name:  IMAG0028.jpg
Views: 49
Size:  83.2 KB
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2012 | 10:24 PM
  #1717  
InfraRedline's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 08-22-08
Posts: 7,177
Likes: 6
From: Alpharetta, GA
You setting your scaler to zero? Is that what youre getting at? Or are you changing the displacement tab maybe?
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2012 | 10:32 PM
  #1718  
zrated89's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: 10-01-07
Posts: 4,184
Likes: 1
From: newportnews va
we were comparing some logs of the old setup and new. My new setup is flowing alot more at idle, and for some reason the throttle body plate isnt staying in the closed position so were gonna try a few things to correct it
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2012 | 11:33 PM
  #1719  
Area47's Avatar
Rent me! per hour
 
Joined: 03-22-07
Posts: 24,161
Likes: 20
From: Still fixing others mistakes.
i had the gm blue printed cams. not 100% stock. just close enough for scca.



i ran the 98's before i did the fuel system. it's not like i can't get a cammed 98lb inj car to idle and act fine. i have been down that road before.

increasing the scaler is not the answer. since hpt doesn't want to give you more lsj tables. or the much needed one like the base idle airflow tables. you wouldn't be having this massive problem with big injectors, or cams.

just an fyi. you will be out of pump here very very shortly.
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2012 | 02:09 AM
  #1720  
InfraRedline's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 08-22-08
Posts: 7,177
Likes: 6
From: Alpharetta, GA
Originally Posted by Area47
i had the gm blue printed cams. not 100% stock. just close enough for scca.



i ran the 98's before i did the fuel system. it's not like i can't get a cammed 98lb inj car to idle and act fine. i have been down that road before.

increasing the scaler is not the answer. since hpt doesn't want to give you more lsj tables. or the much needed one like the base idle airflow tables. you wouldn't be having this massive problem with big injectors, or cams.

just an fyi. you will be out of pump here very very shortly.
Is that the reason that you just less than halved the cylinder volume sir?
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2012 | 08:55 AM
  #1721  
mrbelvedere's Avatar
Super Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-03-05
Posts: 8,090
Likes: 52
From: KY
Originally Posted by Area47
i had the gm blue printed cams. not 100% stock. just close enough for scca.
the cams you ran were stock the blue printed aspect of it just ensures that they were of stock lift and duration
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2012 | 09:40 AM
  #1722  
zrated89's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: 10-01-07
Posts: 4,184
Likes: 1
From: newportnews va
Originally Posted by Area47
i had the gm blue printed cams. not 100% stock. just close enough for scca.



i ran the 98's before i did the fuel system. it's not like i can't get a cammed 98lb inj car to idle and act fine. i have been down that road before.

increasing the scaler is not the answer. since hpt doesn't want to give you more lsj tables. or the much needed one like the base idle airflow tables. you wouldn't be having this massive problem with big injectors, or cams.

just an fyi. you will be out of pump here very very shortly.
I'm not saying u didnt get her to idle i know u did. You're one of the few that actually tunes the car. We will get mine to idle right now I had some other issues POP up. Wideband is stuck on stoich and I have to fix that first. The reason i said u werent on a brfs or a return setup is because I remember u running them first without that. The car is also on a pure maf only tune so I could seat the rings in.
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2012 | 09:43 AM
  #1723  
zrated89's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: 10-01-07
Posts: 4,184
Likes: 1
From: newportnews va
My idle issue is with the cams themselves, not the fuel injectors. If i were on stock cams it wouldn't be an issue. The cams just changed things around a bit and the lack of the tables to correct it is the issue
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2012 | 09:49 AM
  #1724  
RooTBeeR's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 02-18-07
Posts: 14,089
Likes: 0
From: Whittier, Ca
raise idle

problem fixed
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2012 | 09:57 AM
  #1725  
zrated89's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: 10-01-07
Posts: 4,184
Likes: 1
From: newportnews va
Lolz
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:53 AM.