sky redline engine swap
I don't see why not..It's all about what kind of money you are tryin to spend..Money talks. I beleive though that the redline may be rear wheel drive, not sure, which could mean more then just swapping motors
Well you do understand that the engine is transversal, correct?
Also, they are hard enough to even find on the road, good luck trying to find one in a junk yard anywhere.
Also, the Soltice is an RWD vehicle, what type of drivetrain are you trying to hook up to this engine?
You have to think price of doing something like this versus the gains (and this is assuming that this would even work which I highly doubt).
Also, they are hard enough to even find on the road, good luck trying to find one in a junk yard anywhere.
Also, the Soltice is an RWD vehicle, what type of drivetrain are you trying to hook up to this engine?
You have to think price of doing something like this versus the gains (and this is assuming that this would even work which I highly doubt).
Originally Posted by NJHK
Well you do understand that the engine is transversal, correct?
Also, they are hard enough to even find on the road, good luck trying to find one in a junk yard anywhere.
Also, the Soltice is an RWD vehicle, what type of drivetrain are you trying to hook up to this engine?
You have to think price of doing something like this versus the gains (and this is assuming that this would even work which I highly doubt).
Also, they are hard enough to even find on the road, good luck trying to find one in a junk yard anywhere.
Also, the Soltice is an RWD vehicle, what type of drivetrain are you trying to hook up to this engine?
You have to think price of doing something like this versus the gains (and this is assuming that this would even work which I highly doubt).
Some funny terms here! lo
FWD cars then egine sits TRANVERSELY (not transversed)
RWD cars the engine sits in a longitudinal positon.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longitudinal
So you could run into problems there. Plus there is the electronics to dael with.
Just wait for the Turbo Cobalt SS---it will be far more cost effrective.
Also its sad to hear someone "thinks" the Sky may be RWD
FWD cars then egine sits TRANVERSELY (not transversed)
RWD cars the engine sits in a longitudinal positon.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longitudinal
So you could run into problems there. Plus there is the electronics to dael with.
Just wait for the Turbo Cobalt SS---it will be far more cost effrective.
Also its sad to hear someone "thinks" the Sky may be RWD
Originally Posted by Jim@Tagracecraft
Hey what does the Turbo Manifold look like mysweetSS?
Love if you could snap a picture of it for me
And yes timing is everything
Love if you could snap a picture of it for me
And yes timing is everything
The only real problems I would see with doing this swap would be the electronics. It is still the same motor, so I'm sure you could get it to fit and work with a front wheel drive transmission. However, gettting the computer to run it maybe a bit of a problem.
Originally Posted by Jim@Tagracecraft
It would be cheaper to just buy a turbo kit
The setup in the sky is completly different than the cobalt .
We offer a bolt on turbo kit if your interested.
The setup in the sky is completly different than the cobalt .
We offer a bolt on turbo kit if your interested.
It would be cheaper to just buy a Sky Redline/Solstice GXP. But thats just my 2 cents
I love everyone thinks the 2.0 Turbo is better than the 2.0 Supercharged. We boost 12.5 factory and make an avg of 215whp, that engine boosts 19psi factory and makes 228whp. So someone please explain to me why you would want the LNF?
Originally Posted by AlphaJaguar5
I love everyone thinks the 2.0 Turbo is better than the 2.0 Supercharged. We boost 12.5 factory and make an avg of 215whp, that engine boosts 19psi factory and makes 228whp. So someone please explain to me why you would want the LNF?
Originally Posted by avro206
Some funny terms here! lo
FWD cars then egine sits TRANVERSELY (not transversed)
RWD cars the engine sits in a longitudinal positon.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longitudinal
So you could run into problems there. Plus there is the electronics to dael with.
Just wait for the Turbo Cobalt SS---it will be far more cost effrective.
Also its sad to hear someone "thinks" the Sky may be RWD
FWD cars then egine sits TRANVERSELY (not transversed)
RWD cars the engine sits in a longitudinal positon.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longitudinal
So you could run into problems there. Plus there is the electronics to dael with.
Just wait for the Turbo Cobalt SS---it will be far more cost effrective.
Also its sad to hear someone "thinks" the Sky may be RWD
Originally Posted by AlphaJaguar5
I love everyone thinks the 2.0 Turbo is better than the 2.0 Supercharged. We boost 12.5 factory and make an avg of 215whp, that engine boosts 19psi factory and makes 228whp. So someone please explain to me why you would want the LNF?
For the engine design of the LNF compared the LSJ, I'd pick the LNF anyday...this is saying minus a power adder.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sl0wbaltSS
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
18
Nov 21, 2018 11:11 PM
patooyee
Wanted - What to buy - All categories
0
Oct 1, 2015 01:07 PM



