smaller pulley
smaller pulley
im running the gm stage 2 kit now...wanted to know what all is needed in order to get a 2.8 or smaller pulley. i know with a 2.5-2.7 you need a dual pass on the HE but do you need anything different for a 2.8?
Thanks
Thanks
Joined: 12-30-07
Posts: 14,079
Likes: 197
From: NEPA
-60 lb/hr injectors
-New Tune
You should get the following:
-Additional Heat Exchanger
-Dual Pass w/ or w/o Opt. B
-Full Exhaust (Header, Downpipe, Catback)
-Intake
Joined: 12-30-07
Posts: 14,079
Likes: 197
From: NEPA
Thanks
the way i worded it was so the op knows he needs 60's and a tune to even run a 2.8" pulley. too many people like to think they can get away with running a 2.8 on the GM tune + 42's. i wasn't listing it in any specific order. we shouldnt have to spoon feed people on this site. no one does research anymore.
the way i worded it was so the op knows he needs 60's and a tune to even run a 2.8" pulley. too many people like to think they can get away with running a 2.8 on the GM tune + 42's. i wasn't listing it in any specific order. we shouldnt have to spoon feed people on this site. no one does research anymore.
Last edited by Staged07SS; Mar 12, 2010 at 10:56 AM.
First, this (fixed version):
Second:
For the love of God, don't ever drop below a 2.8
Joined: 12-30-07
Posts: 14,079
Likes: 197
From: NEPA
I know. I meant the fact that he even mentioned what is needed below a 2.8 (which he should never go). My bad, should have phrased it differently.
I second this.
I second this.
Joined: 12-30-07
Posts: 14,079
Likes: 197
From: NEPA
do a little research, below a 2.8 you overspin the blower and you're not really making any more power efficiently. If you want more than a 2.8 you need to get a bigger blower or go turbo.
right but wrong peak power wont increase much but torque will and over spinning the blower isent that big of a deal been doing it for a while now as long as you got all the cooling mods on ur car
too many people think the only thing they need to compensate for is the engine -- everyone overlooks that expensive little item that makes all that power to begin with -- the supercharger!
do a little research, below a 2.8 you overspin the blower and you're not really making any more power efficiently. If you want more than a 2.8 you need to get a bigger blower or go turbo.
do a little research, below a 2.8 you overspin the blower and you're not really making any more power efficiently. If you want more than a 2.8 you need to get a bigger blower or go turbo.
You guys wanna see what happens to rotors after 22k miles on a 2.7 puley with no cooling mods. Theres no way anything got in there from the intake, or from the engine.. this is the damage caused from either supercharger debris, or just plain over heating and/or over-spinning. Don't try this at home, hahaha.
Joined: 12-30-07
Posts: 14,079
Likes: 197
From: NEPA
This.
You guys wanna see what happens to rotors after 22k miles on a 2.7 puley with no cooling mods. Theres no way anything got in there from the intake, or from the engine.. this is the damage caused from either supercharger debris, or just plain over heating and/or over-spinning. Don't try this at home, hahaha.

You guys wanna see what happens to rotors after 22k miles on a 2.7 puley with no cooling mods. Theres no way anything got in there from the intake, or from the engine.. this is the damage caused from either supercharger debris, or just plain over heating and/or over-spinning. Don't try this at home, hahaha.

^^ Now that's what I'm talking about. Real life proven cause and effect, not just "well, I'm doing it and I haven't had any problems".
No offense to whoever falls into that category, I'm just saying that too many times on this forum people try to give out advice as to whether or not you should do something based on whether anything bad has happened........yet.
No offense to whoever falls into that category, I'm just saying that too many times on this forum people try to give out advice as to whether or not you should do something based on whether anything bad has happened........yet.
Joined: 12-30-07
Posts: 14,079
Likes: 197
From: NEPA
^^ Now that's what I'm talking about. Real life proven cause and effect, not just "well, I'm doing it and I haven't had any problems".
No offense to whoever falls into that category, I'm just saying that too many times on this forum people try to give out advice as to whether or not you should do something based on whether anything bad has happened........yet.
No offense to whoever falls into that category, I'm just saying that too many times on this forum people try to give out advice as to whether or not you should do something based on whether anything bad has happened........yet.
Joined: 09-29-06
Posts: 20,664
Likes: 217
From: Land of Freedom
if your not giving the car hell all the time a 2.6 is fine aslong as you have much needed cooling. ive had a 2.8 and have beat the crap out of mine for over a year without any problems or meth. now i just ordered a 2.6 and the ais trunk mount kit. you do gain with a 2.6 i raced my buddy that only had a 2.6 and h/e and i had a 2.8 h/e and hatrickstu modintake and full exhaust plus i was tuned by the same guy as him the same day can definetly see the power gain with a 2.6
damn what a good informative thread by me lmao. i wouldnt go lower than a 2.8 but i have a 3.0 on it now. is it even worth it? or should i just work on cooling instead of smaller pulley
Yes you will see gains with a smaller pulley than your 3.0, as long as you take the proper cooling & tuning precautions you can do it relatively safely as well. Asking wether or not you should go smaller or work with your 3.0 is up to what you are willing to risk & what you want out of the car.



