2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

Stroker Crankshafts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 7, 2013 | 09:12 AM
  #51  
mrbelvedere's Avatar
Super Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-03-05
Posts: 8,090
Likes: 52
From: KY
Originally Posted by armcclure
That's a bullshit comment. His posts here were thought out and had reasoning. .
Originally Posted by TStone
How many people have crank problems.....
he was being a smart ass period

would more people do a 2.4 crank in their engines I would say probably so but there is no real solution for a flywheel unless you got a hookup at zzp for their flywheel but then not everyone likes or wants a light weight wheel so is this a better stronger and for once not an over priced aftermarket performance part that we could use
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2013 | 11:00 AM
  #52  
Sox-Fan's Avatar
Got Brakes?
Platinum Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: 12-23-09
Posts: 12,643
Likes: 7
From: Mt. Pleasant S.C.
Originally Posted by armcclure
Wtf is wrong you ******** ragging on stones ass. Grow the **** up. He offered his opinion with reasoning.
Most of you are just memorized by the shiney crank and can't think about this whole deal logically. Stop being selfish.
That's funny.

Selfish is saying don't make it because I don't understand or appreciate it and since I don't then nobody else should be able to buy one. That's selfish.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2013 | 11:21 AM
  #53  
06cobaltncng's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: 06-11-13
Posts: 5,609
Likes: 0
From: North Carolina
josh keep doing what youre doing man. its all about the future of these cars.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2013 | 06:06 PM
  #54  
Tjolley's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-01-11
Posts: 2,799
Likes: 2
From: modesto
2.7 crank!!!!!!!!

Of Ur Gona have a crank made might as well go big

Crower made the cranks for the drag race ecotecs. They had a 2.7 stroker super light crank. They spun it to 12,000 rpm. Made 340 HP at the crank in the NA car
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2013 | 06:11 PM
  #55  
574's Avatar
574
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 11-16-11
Posts: 6,338
Likes: 2
From: Indiana
Yum
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2013 | 06:32 PM
  #56  
JapEatr's Avatar
South Central *********
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: 05-14-05
Posts: 6,148
Likes: 48
From: Texas
Originally Posted by Tjolley
2.7 crank!!!!!!!!

Of Ur Gona have a crank made might as well go big

Crower made the cranks for the drag race ecotecs. They had a 2.7 stroker super light crank. They spun it to 12,000 rpm. Made 340 HP at the crank in the NA car
Id like a 2.5 or 2.7 crank
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2013 | 06:42 PM
  #57  
Josh@ottp's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 01-26-07
Posts: 3,286
Likes: 15
From: Michigan
That's a huge stroke. It would for sure burn oil and need rebuilt very often. I bet you would need a longer sleeve also. The 2.4 stroke is proven reliable for a dd and I think is the best bet.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2013 | 06:48 PM
  #58  
widebody_balt_ss's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-13-07
Posts: 1,731
Likes: 0
From: Iowa
That's a lot of cash. But, I admit. I would think long and hard about it. I'm in the process of buying an engine to re-build and would like to know more about this.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2013 | 09:31 PM
  #59  
Nfamous60's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: 12-04-11
Posts: 3,136
Likes: 1
From: El paso
I would def be down 2.4l sounds good since im rebuilding a block I brought recently maybe somewhere around 1100 for the crank Though 2k idk. I support any and all mods lots of ppl make parts for evos some.won't use why knock ThIS least it's available. Instead of using a2.4 block and only coming to 2.1 after adding.the bottom end you can use your block and bolt in 2.4L makes sense instead.of ppl pulling out motors.

Last edited by Nfamous60; Dec 7, 2013 at 09:38 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2013 | 08:35 AM
  #60  
mrbelvedere's Avatar
Super Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-03-05
Posts: 8,090
Likes: 52
From: KY
Originally Posted by widebody_balt_ss
That's a lot of cash. But, I admit. I would think long and hard about it. I'm in the process of buying an engine to re-build and would like to know more about this.
no its not for a crank

Originally Posted by JapEatr
Id like a 2.5 or 2.7 crank
I can get sleeves to with that crank to make it a 2.7

Last edited by mrbelvedere; Dec 8, 2013 at 08:35 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2013 | 08:50 AM
  #61  
rockSTAR_SS's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 10-19-07
Posts: 2,805
Likes: 2
From: South Mississippi
Originally Posted by Josh@ottp
You could run an le5 rod and piston but it has a smaller and weaker pin. Lsj rods with a custom piston would be a better bet. Figure about $50 more than regular diamond pistons.
Alright thank you. By "custom" piston, what exactly do you mean? Would you be able to provide these parts as well in a package deal?

I would love to have someone build me a block to purchase with this setup to test out. How does the idea of dunning this with a bigger turbo setup sound? I would be willing to try this with the stock turbo first to see how it would do, then move up to a bigger turbo setup.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2013 | 10:10 AM
  #62  
Omiotek's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 07-04-10
Posts: 3,262
Likes: 66
From: Carol Stream, IL
anyone that thinks this is a lot of money for a crank doesnt have a clue. Anyone ever see how much the billet gmr cranks cost????? Josh whos making the cranks? Feel free to pm me if you want and ill keep it behind closed doors. But unless its someone really good i wouldnt consider this.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2013 | 10:18 AM
  #63  
noorj's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: 09-03-10
Posts: 2,746
Likes: 0
From: motor city
Originally Posted by rockSTAR_SS
Would you be able to provide these parts as well in a package deal?
I think this would be a great idea. Do the crank, your rods and whoever's pistons and sell as a packaged deal.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2013 | 11:49 AM
  #64  
ItalianJoe1's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: 11-01-05
Posts: 12,462
Likes: 61
From: Miami, FL
Originally Posted by rockSTAR_SS
Alright thank you. By "custom" piston, what exactly do you mean? Would you be able to provide these parts as well in a package deal?

I would love to have someone build me a block to purchase with this setup to test out. How does the idea of dunning this with a bigger turbo setup sound? I would be willing to try this with the stock turbo first to see how it would do, then move up to a bigger turbo setup.
Custom because they aren't sized like a stock LSJ anymore.

More displacement always works better with boost, it's just not always as high-rpm friendly. This would be great on a healthy sized turbo.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2013 | 07:56 PM
  #65  
armcclure's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 01-10-11
Posts: 3,881
Likes: 20
Originally Posted by Sox-Fan
That's funny.

Selfish is saying don't make it because I don't understand or appreciate it and since I don't then nobody else should be able to buy one. That's selfish.
Really? That's your response? You obviously don't know me at all.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2013 | 08:15 PM
  #66  
dz302's Avatar
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 04-24-09
Posts: 86
Likes: 2
From: ca
I personally believe this is a great option for some people. I have always preferred a short stroke (my screen name) though.I remember the day I bought my car and the big grin I got from the fast rev of the stock motor.

http://rehermorrison.com/tech-talk-5...ich-is-better/

Last edited by dz302; Dec 8, 2013 at 09:40 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2013 | 08:40 PM
  #67  
Sox-Fan's Avatar
Got Brakes?
Platinum Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: 12-23-09
Posts: 12,643
Likes: 7
From: Mt. Pleasant S.C.
Originally Posted by armcclure
Really? That's your response? You obviously don't know me at all.
The quote wasn't in reference to you, but take is as you will. Makes no difference whatsoever.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2013 | 09:32 PM
  #68  
Nfamous60's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: 12-04-11
Posts: 3,136
Likes: 1
From: El paso
What is the projected date of purchase?
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2013 | 02:08 PM
  #69  
Josh@ottp's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 01-26-07
Posts: 3,286
Likes: 15
From: Michigan
I can have them in about 2 months.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2013 | 04:23 PM
  #70  
rockSTAR_SS's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 10-19-07
Posts: 2,805
Likes: 2
From: South Mississippi
1.) ROCKSTAR_SS - LNF; include necessary pistons and rods for stock block/bore
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2013 | 04:33 PM
  #71  
jhaddock21's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 03-21-10
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
From: 46818
Hmmm...this just opened up another option for when I build a motor
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2013 | 01:14 PM
  #72  
Zooomer's Avatar
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 12-13-05
Posts: 1,693
Likes: 3
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Few points

1. Designing a crankshaft is not easy. Balance, crank flex, weight clearances and many more things come into play. One vendor to another Josh, you can't do this. not unless the guy making it is the one designing the whole thing.

2. It's a poor way to discuss this when you say '2.4 stroke'. 2.4 is a result of the bore and stroke. A 2.4 crank in a 2.0 block would give you ~2.3 liters.

3. If someone really wants to do this, you should start where ZZP left off a long time ago posting about the 2.5 crank from GM on our FB page. The new motors (we call them Gen 4) have tons of advancements over the gen 1, 2, and 3 blocks we discuss here. The 2.5 crank is a drop in. In terms of the block, you just have to deal with bearings, balancer, and some other things. It's 8 bolts but the bolts are 1mm larger than the 2.0 so it's even better. Finally, the 2.5 GM crank is forged and only $400 with reluctor installed.
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2013 | 01:52 PM
  #73  
freakta's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 04-22-07
Posts: 5,575
Likes: 0
From: milton ma
Subd
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NJHK
General Cobalt
37
Feb 15, 2014 12:29 PM
Pyros777
Problems/Service/Maintenance
67
Dec 29, 2013 02:59 PM
victory_red_SS
Parts
10
Jul 10, 2007 09:14 AM
WopOnTour
2.2L L61 Performance Tech
33
Nov 27, 2006 10:10 AM
Bad GTP
2.0L LSJ Performance Tech
17
May 17, 2006 02:46 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:32 AM.