Switch to 2.7??

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Jun 29, 2011 | 07:48 AM

#26

klloyd

Thread Starter

Senior Member

iTrader: (3)

Joined: 01-15-11

Posts: 2,378

Likes: 0

From: Brunswick, ME

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chevycobaltss3

fIRST OFF op ANYTHING UNDER A 2.8 WILL BE MAINLY TQ AND A BETTER POWER BAND, ISSUE LIES WITHIN THE MAINTANCE YOU KEEP ON YOUR CAR AN IS SUPPORTING MODS AND OF COURSE THE TUNER...

sorry bout the caps!!

Your dyno seeeeeemmmms wy of bro way off, I have non e guys or meth guys with the same mods in the 280s.....m62 btw. but they are still okish numbers

Must have been on a good dyno because I have the same mods accept for the cat-back, my intake is 2.5" and I have a 2.8 and i'm only at 262.

Jun 29, 2011 | 08:21 AM

#27

Staged07SS

Administrator

Platinum Member

iTrader: (25)

Joined: 12-30-07

Posts: 14,079

Likes: 197

From: NEPA

Quote:

Originally Posted by klloyd

Must have been on a good dyno because I have the same mods accept for the cat-back, my intake is 2.5" and I have a 2.8 and i'm only at 262.

Thread jack (sorry in advance)....

There are no 2.5" intakes for the LSJ!!!

The Injen & K&N are the smallest aftermarket intakes, and both are 2.75" o.d., with a 3" MAF section. The i.d. of them is only slightly smaller than the o.d.

I really need to post the pic I have of my Injen intake being measured to end this missconception of size.

Here are my Injen intake's measurements/dimensions:

Inlet = 2 5/8" i.d. (2.625")
MAF provision area = 2 7/8" i.d. (2.875")
Piping after MAF provision = 2 5/8" i.d. (2.625")
Outlet to throttle body = 2 7/8" i.d. (2.875")

Last edited by Staged07SS; Jun 29, 2011 at 10:20 AM.