2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

TOGheader dyno results >>>>>>>>>

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 29, 2005 | 02:58 PM
  #51  
victory_red_SS's Avatar
LSX RWD S/C conversion
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 03-25-05
Posts: 10,450
Likes: 277
From: Maple Ridge, BC, Canada
Originally Posted by stuffy236
The DP is just the piece from the header to the cat, then its the cat, then the cat back is the piping after the cat.
thanks that helps alot
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2005 | 06:02 PM
  #52  
Maverick's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 08-05-04
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
Does anyone else notice, that in the bottom graph at around 3k rpms there is an increase of 30 lb/ft of torque?!

Am I reading the bottom graph wrong or what. The top two graphs don't seem to show the same amount of torque gain at the same rpm range. It looks like the header gets 30lb/ft above stock at around 3k rpms (in the bottom graph). Stock then catches up at higher rpms. Thats pretty friggin good... If I'm reading this correctly. But Why do the top two seem to be alittle different? Smaller graph or something?
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2005 | 06:55 PM
  #53  
selfinfliction's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: 06-23-05
Posts: 8,004
Likes: 0
From: ky
Originally Posted by QuikFKR
I thought 206/hp 185/tq was a little high for a mustang dyno, aren't most ppl getting around 190-195 hp 170/tq on these dynos?

every dyno is different that's why it's important to do all your runs on the same dyno
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2005 | 06:56 PM
  #54  
selfinfliction's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: 06-23-05
Posts: 8,004
Likes: 0
From: ky
Originally Posted by victory_red_SS
I hear about a downpipe\cat and then I hear about a cat back exhaust. Are people simply moving the position of their cat because I am thinking that there only needs to be one cat correct???

the downpipe has the cat welded into it. it's all one single piece
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2005 | 06:57 PM
  #55  
selfinfliction's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: 06-23-05
Posts: 8,004
Likes: 0
From: ky
Originally Posted by Maverick
Does anyone else notice, that in the bottom graph at around 3k rpms there is an increase of 30 lb/ft of torque?!

Am I reading the bottom graph wrong or what.

the bottom graph was not setup to guage torque, it is only an accurate measurement of the hp
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2005 | 06:59 PM
  #56  
Maverick's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 08-05-04
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
Originally Posted by selfinfliction
the bottom graph was not setup to guage torque, it is only an accurate measurement of the hp
awww shucks
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2005 | 07:04 PM
  #57  
Maverick's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 08-05-04
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
selfinfliction,

you mentioned how headers will so greatly help future mods. whats the consensus on this, will they really greatly increase the gains of other mods? Like that of a cold air intake? or stage upgrade? I'm still wrestling with the idea of buying this. I wish there were more concrete #'s on just how a header would increase the gains of future mods.

for instance if having a header would add an additional 10 hp to a future stage 2 upgrade, then I'd say that would be worth it, but if we are talking only 1 or 2hp then I'm not so sure. I do realize this is impossible to tell at this point though. What about everyones experience with other cars with headers, with other added mods?
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2005 | 07:34 PM
  #58  
selfinfliction's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: 06-23-05
Posts: 8,004
Likes: 0
From: ky
i just got off the phone with jon and gave him a few ideas on some stuff. possibly getting a header to someone that has dyno'd with the psi-fi kit to show how much it will help out after some major mods have already been done. we'll see what can be arranged for that situation. but understand that is weeks away if it can happen
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2005 | 07:34 PM
  #59  
stuffy236's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 04-26-05
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
From: San Marcos/Mcallen, Texas
Maverick, think of it this way.

When you drop a pulley size, your adding more boost correct? Now, where is all that boost going to heading when it gets out of the engine? straight to the header. At first a stock exhaust manifold may be fine, but once you start dropping pulley sizes, more air has to flow in a tiny amount of space. As self infliction has pointed out, the collector is less than 2". almost the size of one of the primaries (the smaller tubes that the individual combustion chamber gases flow through). Now, without that exhaust restriction, air can move freely and not hinder performance.

Does that help or did I confuse you even more?
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2005 | 11:33 PM
  #60  
Maverick's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 08-05-04
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
When you drop a pulley size, your adding more boost correct? Now, where is all that boost going to heading when it gets out of the engine? straight to the header. At first a stock exhaust manifold may be fine, but once you start dropping pulley sizes, more air has to flow in a tiny amount of space. As self infliction has pointed out, the collector is less than 2". almost the size of one of the primaries (the smaller tubes that the individual combustion chamber gases flow through). Now, without that exhaust restriction, air can move freely and not hinder performance.

Does that help or did I confuse you even more?
Oh I do understand that. But my question was by just how much it actually adds power to future mods. I know this is impossible to tell as of now, and if I buy, I want to do it in the group purchase because it will be cheapest. So I'm still unsure what to do.

If money was no option it would be a no brainer. But just wanna get the most possible return on the mods I do buy, thats all.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2005 | 06:40 AM
  #61  
DanM's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 03-25-05
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Originally Posted by Maverick
I know this is impossible to tell as of now,
Exactly, so I don't think anyone's gonna be able to answer your question for certain.

That said, IMO, if you only have enough to buy one thing for your car, then I'd be hanging on for the GMPP stuff or even go buy the psi-fi kit. But I would buy this header way before I would even touch a K&N intake for $250. Also bear in mind that that the GMPP stuff is still probably 4-6 months before you can get it, so maybe you buy this in the mean time, and think about that one later....
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2005 | 09:34 AM
  #62  
num482's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 04-26-05
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: New York
You can get a cat here and build you own dp for alot less. Most are around $50.
http://www.performancepeddler.com/Ca...Name=Magnaflow
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2005 | 07:06 PM
  #63  
n4ggs's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 07-07-05
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
From: sd california
Originally Posted by selfinfliction
the bottom graph was not setup to guage torque, it is only an accurate measurement of the hp
uhm... that makes no sense at all,

hp = (trq*rpm)/5225

if your not accuratly measuring torque your not accuratly measuring hp.
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2005 | 08:06 PM
  #64  
chadder's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 05-10-05
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: Arlington, Tx
^ werd, dynos measure TORQUE, they CALCULATE HP. Oh, and i also think over 400 is alot for a single header...
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2005 | 08:17 PM
  #65  
Jmc007's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-22-05
Posts: 1,591
Likes: 0
From: Quebec City, Quebec
Originally Posted by n4ggs
uhm... that makes no sense at all,

hp = (trq*rpm)/5225

if your not accuratly measuring torque your not accuratly measuring hp.
He didn't say that the dyno did'nt MEASURE torque, but the fact is that the SCALE of torque was larger than the scake of HP.
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2005 | 08:23 PM
  #66  
DanM's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 03-25-05
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Originally Posted by chadder
^ werd, dynos measure TORQUE, they CALCULATE HP. Oh, and i also think over 400 is alot for a single header...
Actually not all of them do. Only load type dynos (which are less common) actually measure torque. Most dynos (including Dynojets) are called inertia dynos ... they actually measure power, and calculate torque.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 06:53 AM
  #67  
n4ggs's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 07-07-05
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
From: sd california
either way, if either one is off then they are both off

ok that makes sense, you were refering to the scale on the graph
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 09:30 AM
  #68  
chadder's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 05-10-05
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: Arlington, Tx
they actually measure power
and what is the difference between your 'power' and my 'torque'? its the same thing... Inertia dyno's measure how strong the car pulls the rollers, and thats torque...
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 11:38 AM
  #69  
DanM's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 03-25-05
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Originally Posted by chadder
Inertia dyno's measure how strong the car pulls the rollers, and thats torque...
No, that's what I'm saying. Inertia dynos measure power, not torque. They're not the same thing at all. They're RELATED, but not the same. The only thing an inertia measures is velocity & time (acceleration), it uses that & the known mass of the roller to determine power, and based on that CALCULATES torque. An inertia dyno makes no kind of torque measurement ... only load dynos do that.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
brickloaf
Show & Shine
56
Jun 18, 2019 12:51 PM
KMO43
Front Page News
33
Jan 12, 2016 12:01 AM
maliki778
Dyno Results
4
Oct 1, 2015 07:39 PM
footballplaya3k
General Cobalt
15
Sep 28, 2015 11:14 AM
KMO43
Featured Car Showcase
37
Sep 27, 2015 08:53 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:41 AM.