2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

Transmission effect on HP.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 4, 2012 | 10:40 AM
  #1  
Stumpalump's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 12-04-12
Posts: 379
Likes: 11
From: Arizona
Transmission effect on HP.

Just got my LSJ 2.0 (05 Cobalt SS) powered sand rail back from the dyno tuner. My results are depressed because I run a VW Bus transaxle with 15% power loss. For comparison does any body know how much HP the stock GM tranny robs?

I also tested it with 33"tall 12.5" wide tires and the Dyno guy said that had a dramatic effect on the numbers. I'm having a hard time trying to figure out how much it effected it. Anybody know or want to guess how much a 33" tire affected the numbers?

213 HP @ 6000 RPM, 210 ft lbs at 4200 RPM. At 2180 torque heads straight up. It runs like a bat out of he11 in a 1500 lbs car but the numbers are low due to tranny and tires. Anybody want to guess how low?

Mods:

LS1 Chevy throttle body
2.9 pulley
ZR1 Corvette inter cooler
42lbs injectors
Headers into high flow header muffler
MEFI4b computer

Oh...And it does second gear wheelies when the boost kicks in. twothumbs
Any thoughts? Thanks
Stump
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2012 | 10:48 AM
  #2  
BankerBalt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-10-10
Posts: 1,848
Likes: 0
From: Eagan, MN
dafuq did i just read?
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2012 | 10:48 AM
  #3  
mrbelvedere's Avatar
Super Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-03-05
Posts: 8,090
Likes: 52
From: KY
thats pretty dam good the numbers arent low is the engine still running stock injectors
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2012 | 10:49 AM
  #4  
jonathan923's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 01-07-09
Posts: 7,851
Likes: 1
From: Queens, NY
what the hell i dont understand anything? MEFI4b computer??? and it almost sounds like you have tunning problems
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2012 | 10:49 AM
  #5  
BankerBalt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-10-10
Posts: 1,848
Likes: 0
From: Eagan, MN
i'm thinking troll
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2012 | 10:50 AM
  #6  
jonathan923's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 01-07-09
Posts: 7,851
Likes: 1
From: Queens, NY
Originally Posted by BankerBalt
dafuq did i just read?
lol that was my exact reaction too
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2012 | 10:51 AM
  #7  
mrbelvedere's Avatar
Super Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-03-05
Posts: 8,090
Likes: 52
From: KY
there is a lsj powered sand rail down here on a complete stock engine it ******* rips hard
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2012 | 10:56 AM
  #8  
AaronJ's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 02-07-10
Posts: 2,381
Likes: 2
From: Oshkosh, WI
If I remember correctly, these cars usually lose 7-8% through the entire drivetrain (that includes wheels, hubs, cv shafts, etc.), so losing 15% just from the transmission is huge. Let's not forget that those 33" x 12.5" wheels and tires are going to weigh a ton. As if the huge increase in weight wasn't enough, since the tires and wheels are rotating items their intertia also eats up power, and their large diameter only amplifies this loss.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2012 | 10:58 AM
  #9  
Stumpalump's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 12-04-12
Posts: 379
Likes: 11
From: Arizona
Originally Posted by mrbelvedere
thats pretty dam good the numbers arent low is the engine still running stock injectors
42 lb. injectors.
The computer is a popular MEFI controller used on all sorts of race rigs. I don't know much about it other than that so I mentioned it.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2012 | 10:59 AM
  #10  
Hockeyman's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 08-10-07
Posts: 5,624
Likes: 8
From: DFW
I don't think those are bad numbers on a 2.9 pulley with that transmission and wheel/tire setup.

A normal LSJ with a 2.9 will likely be in the 225-250whp range depending on supporting mods and tune.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2012 | 11:03 AM
  #11  
mrbelvedere's Avatar
Super Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-03-05
Posts: 8,090
Likes: 52
From: KY
Originally Posted by Stumpalump
42 lb. injectors.
The computer is a popular MEFI controller used on all sorts of race rigs. I don't know much about it other than that so I mentioned it.
the guy running the one here is on the stock pcm your also on the outside edge of those injectors whats the afr set at on wide open throttle
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2012 | 11:22 AM
  #12  
Stumpalump's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 12-04-12
Posts: 379
Likes: 11
From: Arizona
Originally Posted by mrbelvedere
the guy running the one here is on the stock pcm your also on the outside edge of those injectors whats the afr set at on wide open throttle
I don't know the AF numbers but the tuner had a blank check to get it perfect. ADS dyno tuners in Arizona are the top of the food chain around here. They did a lot of work like throttle body mods and a better knock sensor to keep it safe at WOT. It's fueled rich and timing is pulled back until it hits operating temp then its like the power is turned on. Throttle response is spot on to steer with the rear and that was priority over WOT runs. I have confidence they did all that could be done. I was also running 30% LL100 AV gas for the tune and plan on 50/50 from here on out. Hmmmm Is AV gas richer or leaner than pump? Maybe I should stick with 30%.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2012 | 11:24 AM
  #13  
BankerBalt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-10-10
Posts: 1,848
Likes: 0
From: Eagan, MN
there is no way you are running rich with 42's on a 2.9
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2012 | 11:25 AM
  #14  
breds2k's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 11-25-11
Posts: 4,574
Likes: 8
From: Cape Cod, MA
Not sure if real person.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2012 | 11:26 AM
  #15  
mrbelvedere's Avatar
Super Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 12-03-05
Posts: 8,090
Likes: 52
From: KY
the buggy should be tuned for wot also and a bigger set of inj should be put in also

Originally Posted by BankerBalt
there is no way you are running rich with 42's on a 2.9
plenty of people do it

Last edited by mrbelvedere; Dec 4, 2012 at 11:26 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2012 | 11:29 AM
  #16  
BankerBalt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-10-10
Posts: 1,848
Likes: 0
From: Eagan, MN
i ran a 94% duty cycle on a 3.1 on 42's. i can't imagine an LSJ would be much that different as far as duty cycle goes
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2012 | 11:30 AM
  #17  
Stumpalump's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 12-04-12
Posts: 379
Likes: 11
From: Arizona
Originally Posted by BankerBalt
there is no way you are running rich with 42's on a 2.9
It's only rich on the tune when the engine is cold. The tuner said a lot of SC engines blow up when they get pushed hard before they are at full operating temp. I guess it has a different fuel map when the temp sensor reads low. That was my understanding any way.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2012 | 11:35 AM
  #18  
Stumpalump's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 12-04-12
Posts: 379
Likes: 11
From: Arizona
Originally Posted by BankerBalt
i ran a 94% duty cycle on a 3.1 on 42's. i can't imagine an LSJ would be much that different as far as duty cycle goes
Is duty cycle the amount of time the injector is on or how much it's open? I'm guessing that 100% would be the injector wide open for as long as it can be open.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2012 | 11:54 AM
  #19  
TommyP's Avatar
AWD > FWD
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 04-18-09
Posts: 11,087
Likes: 3
From: Youngstown, Ohio
Don't get too hung up on the dyno numbers, they may not exactly be accurate, especially if you aren't sure exactly what gear you should be using on that exact dyno. For example, Cobalts are supposed to be dynod in 3rd gear. I punched it in 1st on the dyno just messing around, and hit over 600 tq!

What I'm saying is that as the car is well tuned, and you are happy with how it drives, then don't worry about it.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2012 | 12:00 PM
  #20  
Omnigear's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 12-15-07
Posts: 13,998
Likes: 1
From: Manama, Bahrain
Originally Posted by Stumpalump
Just got my LSJ 2.0 (05 Cobalt SS) powered sand rail back from the dyno tuner. My results are depressed because I run a VW Bus transaxle with 15% power loss. For comparison does any body know how much HP the stock GM tranny robs?

I also tested it with 33"tall 12.5" wide tires and the Dyno guy said that had a dramatic effect on the numbers. I'm having a hard time trying to figure out how much it effected it. Anybody know or want to guess how much a 33" tire affected the numbers?

213 HP @ 6000 RPM, 210 ft lbs at 4200 RPM. At 2180 torque heads straight up. It runs like a bat out of he11 in a 1500 lbs car but the numbers are low due to tranny and tires. Anybody want to guess how low?

Mods:

LS1 Chevy throttle body
2.9 pulley
ZR1 Corvette inter cooler
42lbs injectors
Headers into high flow header muffler
MEFI4b computer

Oh...And it does second gear wheelies when the boost kicks in. twothumbs
Any thoughts? Thanks
Stump
hit them up
CBM Motorsports - Custom Built Motors - Offroad, Marine, and Hot Rod Engines
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2012 | 01:01 PM
  #21  
Stumpalump's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 12-04-12
Posts: 379
Likes: 11
From: Arizona
CBM is where the computer, throttle body and wire harness came from. They sent a tune and software with it. I called them first and talked to the owner. He asked me to bring him the car for a tune or pay thru the nose at ADS. I payed thru the nose but it was local and now that its done it was evident that CBM was not all that well dialed in with this configuration. I mean how many folks rip a Cobalt engine out and twist it into a buggy? Not their fault. For reference the throttle body plate blocks air to the idle air sensor so it needs to be drilled and a Cobalt knock sensor is not the best one for their computer. Besides that it needs to be tuned a whole lot from their box tune. Such a cool engine it's surprising that swaps aren't more common.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2012 | 01:46 PM
  #22  
Area47's Avatar
Rent me! per hour
 
Joined: 03-22-07
Posts: 24,161
Likes: 20
From: Still fixing others mistakes.
people are failing to look at the rotating mass of the 33x12.50's tires.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2012 | 02:37 PM
  #23  
Bluelightning's Avatar
Got Bewst?
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: 03-16-10
Posts: 10,948
Likes: 33
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Originally Posted by Area47
people are failing to look at the rotating mass of the 33x12.50's tires.
Look at post #8
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
taintedred07
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
32
May 28, 2022 03:47 AM
RaginChopsuey
War Stories
16
Oct 27, 2015 01:27 PM
importkiller
Problems/Service/Maintenance
11
Sep 30, 2015 07:18 PM
Iceberg
New Members Check In!!
8
Sep 29, 2015 12:33 PM
Iceberg
Drivetrain
1
Sep 28, 2015 01:31 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:37 PM.