My car still makes power to 7K as most cars here do.

Jmc007, I'm not saying that run would have hit 350whp as the projection I made clearly doesn't shove the number up that high. I will go ahead and state that it would have hit the 300whp mark however, and I have already stated I think I'll be around 330-340whp on the Mustang Dyno as well.

I guess I'll be able to let you know either way in a real short amount of time though!

 

from the dyno's i have seen power usually drops off around 6500 rpms.

 

Looking at my last dyno, you are correct with this statement. I apologize. I feel though that it has more to do with the M62 running out of huff than anything else. Like I said I'll know soon enough, and will post all my results for everyones viewing pleasure or put downs. Till then everybody relax and have an ice cold brew, it's Friday!

Just for your information the turbo car that is in Canada made 403whp on a stock head and bottom end at 22psi with a GT2871R.

 

keeping an eye on this thread*

 

Same here.

 

hmm..

well the TVS units spin 20k continous...

 

Plus we don't have EGRs and rely on slight exhaust gas reversion for cooling cylinder temps; of course that's not a concern to someone going for power but it would be an effect of using such a cam.

 

if your offering ideas like that your in the wrong thread / wrong forums

 

booooooobooo is probably wasey or awd haha

i'm intrigued to see what this and a TVS swap would do, more options for you guys the better hell the 2.4's have more options then you guys right now haha

cant wait to see numbers on any and everything

 

well isn't that special.

 

silly question, i was looking at the 2 dimensioning drawings for the 1200ax and 1600ax blowers and from what i can see the outlet on the blowers is very similar, the only major difference is the inlet side.

whats the feasability of upgrading from the 1200 to the 1600?

 

well you figure if this setup puts down 330whp, thats pretty much just like an LS2 anyway not to mention if you swapped one in and made the car RWD with all the weight your adding you would need an LS7 to offset the weight

LS7 = 14k
Twin Screw = 3k

Eco>v8

 

LAWL on the ricerness of that statement but.. it's sooo true.. haha

it's mostly personal taste though

 

You'll NEVER make 350 to the wheels on the stock head. Not a chance in hell.

 

agreed ^^^^

 

403whp is maybe true (in fact it's very possible at 22 PSI on a turbo), but nonetheless there is a LOT of loss caused by the stock head. But if it would have been me putting down those kind of numbers, let me say that I would have post several dyno charts everywhere over the forums. It's simply weird hearing people saying : "One guy know a guy who know a guy who puts 350 or 400 whp, but we never see the dyno charts ...". Again I trust it, but these guys should be more enthusiast and post their charts !

 

im just wondering why every one of thse threads turns into a turbo vs supercharger thread? Why not just let those who want to supercharge try and figure this out without entertaining the turbo vs sc argument all the time?

 

I do agree about all the hear-say but no offense man there's a world out side of ss.net and ALOTA ppl dont understand this. So just because u dont see dyno sheets on here doesnt mean they dont exist.

2K5SS/SC? - show these biatches what's up.

I must admit i was intially disappointed with the numbers of the twinscrew but looking at the specs of the 1200AX and considering this was the FIRST tuning session, 280whp is pretty good on a STOCK SS/SC.

 

Cant' wait to see the numbers you put down...lucky man to get the first one!

I will follow behind patiently...hopefully the ported head gains me a little extra.

 

As for the whole Mustang Dyno vs. DynoJet deal: Mustang Dynos average 10% lower on N/A vehicles. On a DynoJet, a F/I car isn't allowed to build full boost and maintain that boost throughout the whole power curve. My personal numbers are from a Mustang Dyno in San Antonio. I put down 227 whp stock. Thus, I'd love to see what the TS puts down on a Mustang Dyno compared to the DynoJet.

 

ok heres a thought though , would a company start a project with only the hope that there a stupid people (or ignorant) that would just buy the ts because they want a ts
i doubt this rebel has done their homework i imagine and ts is worth ir b/c it cost them more than 3k to make the kit

 

QUOTE=2K5SS/SC?;1291150]This my friend is the gentleman that helped fabricate and tune both of Rebel's twinscrew and turbo cars. He is quite knowledgeable since I've been in contact with him, and I certainly do not doubt his word for one moment. How do I know this, I know only because I'm awaiting the twinscrew to reach my doorstep since I've been in on this project since December. [/QUOTE]



hey hey hey, never did i say rebel was out to screw anyonea. you post and that you say you have had money in it since december, when rebels site went up 4 or 5 months ago? Guess you misunderstood my post. as i understood it, the 403 hp turbo swap spoken above was done at tag. i would love to have this verified. and you say it was a fabricator/tuner, would this be the very same one selling parts while working elsewhere in the same industry? I just want to know whod i'd be dealing with over there. pm me a screen name here then, that would be fine.

 

hey hey hey, never did i say rebel was out to screw anyonea. you post and that you say you have had money in it since december, when rebels site went up 4 or 5 months ago? Guess you misunderstood my post. as i understood it, the 403 hp turbo swap spoken above was done at tag. i would love to have this verified. and you say it was a fabricator/tuner, would this be the very same one selling parts while working elsewhere in the same industry? I just want to know whod i'd be dealing with over there. pm me a screen name here then, that would be fine.[/QUOTE]

I wasn't trying to be mean in the post, just informative. Sorry if I came off that way, but it seems lately I'm always trying to defend myself here. If you do some video searching on youtube.com with Rebel Auto Worx, there is some informative stuff in their videos. The thing I noticed most is that the Rebel kit uses the same turbo, and the piping on TAG's final kit looks damn near identical to Rebel's. Not to mention Mase stopped working with TAG after some bad blood, and went to seek Rebel's help to finish the kit. I'll send you a PM with what I think really happened behind the scenes.

BoominIt, I can't wait to get that kit as I'm sure you're excited as well. The only reason why I'll be getting mine first is to finish up the testing, and put down some hard numbers for them. Otherwise I would of had to wait just a bit longer.

P7X, I'll do my best to squeeze every ounce of power I can SAFELY from this thing!

 

This post right here is basically saying EXACTLY what I've been saying since the first time someone mentioned using a 1200AX. It spins too slow to make any kind of REAL power. Thats why I've always been saying the W75AX (although they no longer make it) is a far better choice because of its 20,000 rpm limit. Think about this, 20,000 rpm = 2.5" pulley with 8000 rpm rev limit!!!

 

I talked to Mase earlier he told me the scoop. I will wait the additional week to get mine powder coated black.
When is your dyno going to happen?
Make sure you get a vid as well!