2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

tvs dyno results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 9, 2009 | 09:09 AM
  #26  
lsjwannabe's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 01-23-06
Posts: 10,731
Likes: 0
From: on here
Scott,

Keep detonation, and egts in check and your pistons are fine.

I tested up to 28 psi daily on the tvs. The motor never skipped a beat.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2009 | 09:12 AM
  #27  
damien's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 04-12-09
Posts: 1,739
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Lol, so much for 340whp.

Last edited by damien; Jun 9, 2009 at 09:27 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2009 | 10:48 AM
  #28  
Rodimus_Prime's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 04-02-06
Posts: 4,513
Likes: 0
From: Harrisburg, PA
I love how everyone gives me **** about my 298whp saying I should be higher yet theres still only like 3-4 people that have done better.

Whats that now 3 sub 300whp TVS dynos in the past week? Maybe now folks will realize that your probably not going to get 300+ first time out.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2009 | 10:50 AM
  #29  
scott allen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-18-08
Posts: 2,495
Likes: 0
From: louisville k.y
i ordered the 75mm pulley from ott,im going back to the dyno and see what happens.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2009 | 10:57 AM
  #30  
Josh@ottp's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 01-26-07
Posts: 3,286
Likes: 15
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by Rodimus_Prime
I love how everyone gives me **** about my 298whp saying I should be higher yet theres still only like 3-4 people that have done better.

Whats that now 3 sub 300whp TVS dynos in the past week? Maybe now folks will realize that your probably not going to get 300+ first time out.
This is on a mustang dyno, he is already over 300whp on a dynojet....
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2009 | 11:00 AM
  #31  
scott allen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-18-08
Posts: 2,495
Likes: 0
From: louisville k.y
Originally Posted by fast98
This is on a mustang dyno, he is already over 300whp on a dynojet....
the tuner said if i was on a dyno jet that it would put down 322 whp how true is that fast? and at 250 tq on the mustang what would that be on a dyno jet? thanks
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2009 | 11:01 AM
  #32  
Tennpenn83's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-12-07
Posts: 1,585
Likes: 1
From: Columbus, Ohio
Originally Posted by Rodimus_Prime
I love how everyone gives me **** about my 298whp saying I should be higher yet theres still only like 3-4 people that have done better.

Whats that now 3 sub 300whp TVS dynos in the past week? Maybe now folks will realize that your probably not going to get 300+ first time out.
maybe they expect better numbers out of you because you've had your tvs for a lot longer. i've had mine on for what, a month? and most of that month was breaking in the pistons/rings?

your numbers should be higher, you should have figured out the issues by now. but you bite the hand that feeds you. my numbers are within earshot of yours, and this is on a base tune made mostly by myself with some help and advice from others who know what they are doing. i was heatsoaking like a ****, running rich as **** (11.2-11.4 on the wideband), had iat2's in the 160 range, and had conservative timing on 3 back-to-back 4th gear pulls with absolutely no cooldown time and only revving to 6500. and i'm still less than 15hp shy of your many months worth of tuning - on my base tune

get over yourself. i will be over 300 before my next dyno. can you say that?
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2009 | 11:02 AM
  #33  
freakta's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 04-22-07
Posts: 5,575
Likes: 0
From: milton ma
i cant wait to get my tvs dynoed. im gonna break the mold of this under 300 whp curse
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2009 | 11:05 AM
  #34  
Zooomer's Avatar
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 12-13-05
Posts: 1,693
Likes: 3
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Originally Posted by Rodimus_Prime
Whats that now 3 sub 300whp TVS dynos in the past week? Maybe now folks will realize that your probably not going to get 300+ first time out.
Better be careful. There were calls to ban me for saying that
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2009 | 11:07 AM
  #35  
06_SIC_SS's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: 09-14-08
Posts: 3,424
Likes: 0
From: Akron, Ohio
me too if my header/downpipe ever show up
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2009 | 11:08 AM
  #36  
Snakes709's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 06-03-08
Posts: 4,383
Likes: 1
From: Edmonton
something im noticing with people wanting 300+ whp and not making it...none of the people have meth. That makes a big difference
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2009 | 11:14 AM
  #37  
scott allen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-18-08
Posts: 2,495
Likes: 0
From: louisville k.y
meth is on my list but i just dont want to depend on it.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2009 | 11:15 AM
  #38  
lsjwannabe's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 01-23-06
Posts: 10,731
Likes: 0
From: on here
Originally Posted by Rodimus_Prime
I love how everyone gives me **** about my 298whp saying I should be higher yet theres still only like 3-4 people that have done better.

Whats that now 3 sub 300whp TVS dynos in the past week? Maybe now folks will realize that your probably not going to get 300+ first time out.
Give it two weeks and you might see what the tvs is really capable of
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2009 | 11:28 AM
  #39  
elecblue06's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 03-19-07
Posts: 14,901
Likes: 1
From: newburgh,ny
Originally Posted by twzted
ok looking at this sheet even more...i don't know if i can even trust these numbers, i never payed attention to it before, but the tq and hp curves don't even cross at the 5252 rev mark...

never noticed it...so ignore my numbers

but you should work on your tune anyway and be able to pull out some more esp. with your setup...
post up your dyno sheet your probably have different scaling on each side one for trq one for HP.. I had that issue too
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2009 | 11:29 AM
  #40  
Snakes709's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 06-03-08
Posts: 4,383
Likes: 1
From: Edmonton
Originally Posted by scott allen
meth is on my list but i just dont want to depend on it.
good thing to have...keeps the IAT down and gives abit of extra power. I did a small tune just to get it basically working right on my car...added 2* of timing (could have added alot more) and messed with the a/f ratio abit and gained 14whp. Pretty damn good with a quick/basic tune
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2009 | 11:30 AM
  #41  
scott allen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-18-08
Posts: 2,495
Likes: 0
From: louisville k.y
Originally Posted by Snakes709
good thing to have...keeps the IAT down and gives abit of extra power. I did a small tune just to get it basically working right on my car...added 2* of timing (could have added alot more) and messed with the a/f ratio abit and gained 14whp. Pretty damn good with a quick/basic tune
yea that is pretty good,i just dont want to be tuned to run on meth all the time .
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2009 | 11:32 AM
  #42  
Rodimus_Prime's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 04-02-06
Posts: 4,513
Likes: 0
From: Harrisburg, PA
ill be redynoed in 2 weeks as well
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2009 | 11:42 AM
  #43  
2K5SS/SC?'s Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-08-05
Posts: 6,200
Likes: 0
From: Niceville, FL
And people ridculed me for my 272whp on my local Mustang dyno with the twinscrew on a rough base tune I made back in the day.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2009 | 11:44 AM
  #44  
scott allen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-18-08
Posts: 2,495
Likes: 0
From: louisville k.y
the should put you at300 whp on a dyno jet.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2009 | 01:04 PM
  #45  
burntorange's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-13-06
Posts: 828
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio
Originally Posted by 2K5SS/SC?
And people ridculed me for my 272whp on my local Mustang dyno with the twinscrew on a rough base tune I made back in the day.

I really wish that would have been fixed and hit full-scale production.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2009 | 01:29 PM
  #46  
Rodimus_Prime's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 04-02-06
Posts: 4,513
Likes: 0
From: Harrisburg, PA
Theres 2 reasons why, people on this forum not realizing how worthless the M62 is and a horrible vendor with little engineering or tuning knowledge trying to make it.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2009 | 03:59 PM
  #47  
KillinKrullin's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 02-15-08
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland OH
^ ouch.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2009 | 04:39 PM
  #48  
scott allen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-18-08
Posts: 2,495
Likes: 0
From: louisville k.y
about a week from now i will be going back to the dyno.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2009 | 04:47 PM
  #49  
burntorange's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-13-06
Posts: 828
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio
Originally Posted by Rodimus_Prime
Theres 2 reasons why, people on this forum not realizing how worthless the M62 is and a horrible vendor with little engineering or tuning knowledge trying to make it.
who?
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2009 | 04:54 PM
  #50  
Johnboy12358's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-05-06
Posts: 2,263
Likes: 0
From: DFW, TX
Why does everyone have to get all pissed off, we are all trying to get to the same goal here...
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:54 AM.