tvs dyno results
well im putting on a 75mm pulley i just put the spec 3 plus clutch and flywheel in .i hope that helps . I think the pulley will be worth 9 whp and the spec lightweight flywheel i hope it will free up 2 whp. so we will see.and i think ill gain around 10 wtq as well hopefully
Last edited by scott allen; Jun 9, 2009 at 06:52 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
I have actually calculated the difference and my local Mustang dyno rates 13% lower than the local Dynojet I have also run on. It certainly would have laid over 300whp on the Dynojet, and I hadn't even sprayed meth/tuned for it at that point either.
Finally, good luck with hitting the 300+whp mark. I will be awaiting the results.
Last edited by 2K5SS/SC?; Jun 10, 2009 at 01:12 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
The setup did get fixed and I received all the parts for it, but I never got to run it and do final testing due to my motor blowing up, so I had to sell it to someone else. Full scale production probably never would have occured though due to the TVS's release since it was a direct bolt on affair compared to having to use adapter plates and whatnot.
I have actually calculated the difference and my local Mustang dyno rates 13% lower than the local Dynojet I have also run on. It certainly would have laid over 300whp on the Dynojet, and I hadn't even sprayed meth/tuned for it at that point either.
Finally, good luck with hitting the 300+whp mark. I will be awaiting the results.
I have actually calculated the difference and my local Mustang dyno rates 13% lower than the local Dynojet I have also run on. It certainly would have laid over 300whp on the Dynojet, and I hadn't even sprayed meth/tuned for it at that point either.
Finally, good luck with hitting the 300+whp mark. I will be awaiting the results.
To me, you shouldnt have to add in a percentage to get to where you want.
Id rather have the paper that says 300, than "well it says 290-something, but just add 11% and its over 300!"...
Id rather have the paper that says 300, than "well it says 290-something, but just add 11% and its over 300!"...
well if i was on a dyno jet thats what it would of put down. I dont see you dyno jet guys taking away 11%. If you all did no one would have 300 or better whp. I look at a lot of dyno # s on here and 90% of them are dynojets. Lets see someone put down 290 whp on a mustang dyno and that was only about a hour s worth of tuning.
i understand were you comeing from im not bashing either .Im just saying if some one made let say 305 whp on a dynojet that would only be 271 whp on a mustang dyno i dont see the dynojet guys taking away 11%. All im saying is if i was on a dynojet i would put down 322whp.
yea me to im going back to the dyno, this time ill have a light weight flywheel and clutch, and a 75 mm pulley,and more tunning. I hope i can squeez another 10 whp and 15wtq. next month ill will have meth.i hope to get another 15 whp out of that.
.....
i understand were you comeing from im not bashing either .Im just saying if some one made let say 305 whp on a dynojet that would only be 271 whp on a mustang dyno i dont see the dynojet guys taking away 11%. All im saying is if i was on a dynojet i would put down 322whp.
You guys should just be happy with what you have. I don't know about you guys but my TVS LSJ has a ton of power. I put down 287whp on a dynojet and I am not going to cry about it.
I am running the stock TVS pulley 3.15" and made probably +70whp over an M62 with the same size pulley.
^ this.
I made sure to get a baseline dyno on GM S3 so that when I go TVS I will know exactly how much I gained as compared to MYSELF on the same dyno with similar weather conditions.
I wouldn't sweat the numbers Scott. If there is truly more to be had with your current mods then just keep at it and you'll get there.
I made sure to get a baseline dyno on GM S3 so that when I go TVS I will know exactly how much I gained as compared to MYSELF on the same dyno with similar weather conditions.
I wouldn't sweat the numbers Scott. If there is truly more to be had with your current mods then just keep at it and you'll get there.
well i got my charts i cant find the last pull we did with the 290 whp and 250 wht. But here is what i do have.
283.9 @ 6750 whp
244.7 @ 5250 wtq
heres another pull
287 @ 7037whp
246 @ cant read the rpms wtq
the 290whp was at 7100
283.9 @ 6750 whp
244.7 @ 5250 wtq
heres another pull
287 @ 7037whp
246 @ cant read the rpms wtq
the 290whp was at 7100
Last edited by scott allen; Jun 10, 2009 at 01:17 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
i know that im just saying if both dynos were set up right the dynojet would read higher. Thats all im saying.
Last edited by scott allen; Jun 10, 2009 at 06:36 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
bull **** on that , god you guys really need to learn something about dyno's. I have both dyno's at my disposal and guess what, you are wrong sir!!! The dyno jet will not read higher END




