Whipple 1.6L, Checking interest
Seems to me like alot of trouble when you can just bolt on a TVS. I know you need to modify the MAP but it's about as close to a direct swap as you going to get . What area is the whipple so much better than the R1320? CFM or efficiency?
good question, I don't see it being better in either area.
You have to grind down the side a little so it can be twisted so the blower will clear.



Those are pics of how close the tvs is, thats why i was saying it mat not be possible.



Those are pics of how close the tvs is, thats why i was saying it mat not be possible.
Last edited by lsjwannabe; Jul 20, 2008 at 12:22 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
If we want to get very technical here... the 1.6L twin screw at full boost will push more CFM and be more efficient, hand down.... but there is a down side.
The twin screw is always compressing... it uses power at idle and while cruising to turn the blower, unlike the TVS.
Despite common belief and talk, the TS and TVS excel in very different areas.
If we want to get very technical here... the 1.6L twin screw at full boost will push more CFM and be more efficient, hand down.... but there is a down side.
The twin screw is always compressing... it uses power at idle and while cruising to turn the blower, unlike the TVS.
If we want to get very technical here... the 1.6L twin screw at full boost will push more CFM and be more efficient, hand down.... but there is a down side.
The twin screw is always compressing... it uses power at idle and while cruising to turn the blower, unlike the TVS.
ok.. please show me an isentropic efficiency map for the twin screw...
The fact of the matter is, VERY few know how to read an isentriopic efficiency map and understand what it means. People are still under the belief the twins screws MUST be more efficient. This has not been the case..
on an alternate note, I have yet to see any 2.3L Twin screw make 950+hp... yet the TVS R2300 (2.3L) made over 1000hp..
Please show efficiency maps when claiming anything becuase 90% of the time they just listening to what Kenne Bell, Whipple, and other twin screw manufacturers have to say... which of course, is in their favor
Also, a bypass valve cannot relieve internal compression.. and 1hp at idle is ALOT of power
The fact of the matter is, VERY few know how to read an isentriopic efficiency map and understand what it means. People are still under the belief the twins screws MUST be more efficient. This has not been the case..
on an alternate note, I have yet to see any 2.3L Twin screw make 950+hp... yet the TVS R2300 (2.3L) made over 1000hp..
Please show efficiency maps when claiming anything becuase 90% of the time they just listening to what Kenne Bell, Whipple, and other twin screw manufacturers have to say... which of course, is in their favor
Also, a bypass valve cannot relieve internal compression.. and 1hp at idle is ALOT of power
ok.. please show me an isentropic efficiency map for the twin screw...
The fact of the matter is, VERY few know how to read an isentriopic efficiency map and understand what it means. People are still under the belief the twins screws MUST be more efficient. This has not been the case..
on an alternate note, I have yet to see any 2.3L Twin screw make 950+hp... yet the TVS R2300 (2.3L) made over 1000hp..
Please show efficiency maps when claiming anything becuase 90% of the time they just listening to what Kenne Bell, Whipple, and other twin screw manufacturers have to say... which of course, is in their favor
Also, a bypass valve cannot relieve internal compression.. and 1hp at idle is ALOT of power
The fact of the matter is, VERY few know how to read an isentriopic efficiency map and understand what it means. People are still under the belief the twins screws MUST be more efficient. This has not been the case..
on an alternate note, I have yet to see any 2.3L Twin screw make 950+hp... yet the TVS R2300 (2.3L) made over 1000hp..
Please show efficiency maps when claiming anything becuase 90% of the time they just listening to what Kenne Bell, Whipple, and other twin screw manufacturers have to say... which of course, is in their favor
Also, a bypass valve cannot relieve internal compression.. and 1hp at idle is ALOT of power
I still stand by my reasons that the twin screw is far more effeicent above 20psi than the TVS is.
I've asked Opcon for the true maps on the 1.5, 1.6, and 1.7L screws... and they are indeed far superior at the top end.
WRT the comment about the bypass, it is true that it takes 'very little' power to turn during cruising, but I assure you that Kenne Bell is out to lunch on that one. According to Opcon, it's 1-4hp depending on the pulley your using. Remember that a twin screw compresses in the rotors, unlike the roots type blowers.
I've ridden in a car with the TVS. I was neither let down or disappointed.. I actually opened my mouth up real wide once the pedal was to the floor.. It sounded like one of the big roller coaster rides right when you go down a Huge Vertical Drop..
SHHHHWOOOOOOOOOOO -headback- SHHWOOOOOO -shift- -scream- -giggle- SCHOOOOWOOWOWOWO.
Just like that.. I may be off a couple showoowow's.
SHHHHWOOOOOOOOOOO -headback- SHHWOOOOOO -shift- -scream- -giggle- SCHOOOOWOOWOWOWO.
Just like that.. I may be off a couple showoowow's.
well heres a huge bump for u.
http://www.whipplesuperchargers.com/...sp?ProdID=1162,
Model Displacement Max Continous RPM Max Peak RPM Max CFM Max M^3/HR Max PSI Peak VE Peak AE
W100AX 1.6 Liter/rev.......18,000..........................20,000.. ...........1120..........1902.............30...... ........99.............81....
those are the specs. i'd try and get something going but unfortunatly no more cobalt for me
what a pooper. maybe someone else can get something going.
http://www.whipplesuperchargers.com/...sp?ProdID=1162,
Model Displacement Max Continous RPM Max Peak RPM Max CFM Max M^3/HR Max PSI Peak VE Peak AE
W100AX 1.6 Liter/rev.......18,000..........................20,000.. ...........1120..........1902.............30...... ........99.............81....
those are the specs. i'd try and get something going but unfortunatly no more cobalt for me
back from the dead again, is this going to come out or what? More options is great, but I'm still sold on the TVS.
after all, the TVS is basically a factory upgraded supercharger.
after all, the TVS is basically a factory upgraded supercharger.
Last edited by ralliartist; Sep 18, 2008 at 04:05 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost




funny things happen