2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

Whipple 1.6L, Checking interest

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 18, 2008 | 04:13 PM
  #101  
restonSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-13-08
Posts: 2,050
Likes: 0
From: up my own ass
im kinda tempted, but the tvs just seems like the way to go. hopefully in the spring ill be ready to push some serious numbers
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2008 | 04:15 PM
  #102  
ShortStack's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-16-08
Posts: 5,610
Likes: 0
From: Boynton Beach, Fl
could you take the m62 and bore it out... kinda like an engine, if you had rotors that fit perfectly?

whipple looks better than that TVS... im going to email them as well...
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2008 | 04:29 PM
  #103  
EXsoccer1921's Avatar
Senior Member
Platinum Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: 05-04-08
Posts: 36,934
Likes: 2
From: The 405
short let me know what you come up with. i'm interested in pricing and fitments.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2008 | 04:41 PM
  #104  
Eddie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-11-04
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 0
From: patterson, ca
Originally Posted by EXsoccer1921
short let me know what you come up with. i'm interested in pricing and fitments.
fitment just like cobra guys u'd most likely need an adapter plate to hook up to the manifold. and then some type of intake inlet. they have the drive units in increments of 1" so, a custom drive unit will not be needed. if i still had my balt u'd best believe i'd have one of these right now. figuring out a way to make it fit and work.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2008 | 04:46 PM
  #105  
ralliartist's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-06-05
Posts: 10,944
Likes: 2
From: Seneca, South Carolina
Originally Posted by ShortStack
could you take the m62 and bore it out... kinda like an engine, if you had rotors that fit perfectly?

whipple looks better than that TVS... im going to email them as well...
sure, that would totally work.

No, you can't. lol. The bearings, the design, the placement of the snout, the placement of the intake of the air, the way the air exits the supercharger, it's all different for every supercharger.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2008 | 08:40 PM
  #106  
rukkee's Avatar
Premium Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 08-21-06
Posts: 6,574
Likes: 0
From: Western NY
I wonder if eaton could change the rotor design of the m-62's to make them more efficient? Maybe a different pitch or tighter mesh? Just dreaming i know , but it would be sweet to have a "rotor" upgrade lol.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2008 | 09:10 PM
  #107  
Omega_5's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-01-06
Posts: 5,134
Likes: 0
From: Maidstone, SK
Originally Posted by rukkee
I wonder if eaton could change the rotor design of the m-62's to make them more efficient? Maybe a different pitch or tighter mesh? Just dreaming i know , but it would be sweet to have a "rotor" upgrade lol.
They did.
Intense was selling them a few of them this spring (I think). They called them something like a gen7 M62.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2008 | 09:36 PM
  #108  
ralliartist's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-06-05
Posts: 10,944
Likes: 2
From: Seneca, South Carolina
got any links. I don't remember seeing anything like that.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2008 | 09:50 PM
  #109  
black07ssc's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 08-04-07
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
From: Edson, Alberta, Canada
I believe there are also a few H62 made. H for hybrid using a different rotor design i believe.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2008 | 10:38 PM
  #110  
cobaltR's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-25-06
Posts: 835
Likes: 0
From: Jaffrey, NH
subscribed...hopefully something good comes out of this.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2008 | 11:20 PM
  #111  
InfinityzeN's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-02-06
Posts: 3,507
Likes: 0
From: Harker Heights, TX
They were called the H62, and IIRC, they flowed about 5% more air a little more efficently.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2008 | 12:09 AM
  #112  
Omega_5's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-01-06
Posts: 5,134
Likes: 0
From: Maidstone, SK
Originally Posted by ralliartist
got any links. I don't remember seeing anything like that.

https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/parts-66/prototype-blower-91072/
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2008 | 12:44 AM
  #113  
ShortStack's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-16-08
Posts: 5,610
Likes: 0
From: Boynton Beach, Fl
WORD FROM WHIPPLE IS NOT GOOD!!!!

Got an email reply back saying...

They said they do not have an application at this time and arent sure about one either...
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2008 | 12:48 AM
  #114  
EXsoccer1921's Avatar
Senior Member
Platinum Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: 05-04-08
Posts: 36,934
Likes: 2
From: The 405
well damn.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2008 | 09:38 AM
  #115  
Eddie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-11-04
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 0
From: patterson, ca
Originally Posted by ShortStack
WORD FROM WHIPPLE IS NOT GOOD!!!!

Got an email reply back saying...

They said they do not have an application at this time and arent sure about one either...
it wont be direct swap. just like rebel's ur going have to make an adapter plate to match up to the manifold, as well as a intake snoute. i doubt they'll make a direct replacement as the LSJ was such limited production, if gm continued the LSJ program a few more years then yes but it was scratched for the LNF. so only 3 years of limited production, if that.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2008 | 09:41 AM
  #116  
ShortStack's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-16-08
Posts: 5,610
Likes: 0
From: Boynton Beach, Fl
hmm... didnt know that..

is lsj the lnf with turbo?? or are there any differences?

I see alot of mixed results with the TVS... wonder if they just dont have any mods to support it...
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2008 | 10:27 AM
  #117  
ralliartist's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-06-05
Posts: 10,944
Likes: 2
From: Seneca, South Carolina
more and more info pops up everyday. I just got an email back from intense saying they have never offered an upgraded supercharger. I'm going to email them back as they were clearly wrong after I saw that thread. lol. I dunno.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2008 | 10:28 AM
  #118  
lsjwannabe's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 01-23-06
Posts: 10,731
Likes: 0
From: on here
DI, VVT, are a few of the differences
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2008 | 11:06 AM
  #119  
ShortStack's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-16-08
Posts: 5,610
Likes: 0
From: Boynton Beach, Fl
forgot about the DI.. gotta love it!..

intense is whack from what i have heard...

such difficult decisions!!
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2008 | 02:55 PM
  #120  
ralliartist's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-06-05
Posts: 10,944
Likes: 2
From: Seneca, South Carolina
intense emailed me back again and said that eaton asked for the hybrid superchargers back. So that's a no go if anyone wants one.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2008 | 03:42 PM
  #121  
ShortStack's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-16-08
Posts: 5,610
Likes: 0
From: Boynton Beach, Fl
so really its tvs or m62?
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2008 | 03:50 PM
  #122  
ralliartist's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-06-05
Posts: 10,944
Likes: 2
From: Seneca, South Carolina
considering the twinscrew STILL isn't released for production, then yes. If you want to stay supercharged, then it's m62 or HTVS 1320.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2009 | 01:21 AM
  #123  
Doward's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 01-01-09
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Originally Posted by ralliartist
considering the twinscrew STILL isn't released for production, then yes. If you want to stay supercharged, then it's m62 or HTVS 1320.
or......

https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/2-0l-lsj-performance-tech-47/whipple-w100ax-kit-interest-151985/
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
turbochargedss2012
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
11
Sep 20, 2023 12:17 PM
brandon04
Problems/Service/Maintenance
46
Oct 21, 2015 07:04 AM
HEATON
Parts
12
Oct 16, 2015 07:21 PM
Tupp
Suspension
5
Sep 30, 2015 08:18 PM
yellow dragon
Problems/Service/Maintenance
0
Sep 28, 2015 09:49 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:24 AM.