2.2L L61 Performance Tech 16 valve 145 hp EcoTec with 155 lb-ft of torque

How is this sounding so far..?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 24, 2009 | 06:29 PM
  #26  
oldskool's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 06-21-09
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
From: Reading, PA
Originally Posted by D4u2s0t
what else do you have done to the car?
Full bolt-ons and tune, stock head and cams
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2009 | 11:02 PM
  #27  
jonxxxedge1's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-31-09
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 0
From: depew, ny
Originally Posted by nikebaseballx00
do a zzp midlenghth combo

i have heard nothing but good about them

i had the obx combo on my car but it wouldnt seal, i got new gaskets and put the bolts on in the right order... i think the header was warped

but while it was on the car ripped, pulled all the way thru the powerband, i believe it was 1.5 primaries and 2.5
same thing happened to my obx
thats what you get for buying car **** off ebay!
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2009 | 03:11 AM
  #28  
xxxxsh4d0wxxxx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-22-08
Posts: 3,460
Likes: 3
From: New Lenox, Illinois
I'm still hell bent on the Vibrant.. Lol. I don't really like any of the others..

Reply
Old Dec 25, 2009 | 04:39 AM
  #29  
olivecj's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-12-07
Posts: 1,380
Likes: 0
From: nova scotia
You should go with clearimage man. Their company is great to deal with and the parts they make are top notch quality. Plus they are a little cheeper in price than vibrant and match them in quality and fitment. ZZP, pacecetter, and obx are cheeper and lots of people have experienced problems with those headers. I had a obx 4-1 header on my old nissan altima and it was a complete nightmare to get it to fit properly and seal correctly.
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2009 | 07:41 AM
  #30  
Maven's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-25-05
Posts: 7,661
Likes: 7
From: Southern New Jersey
Originally Posted by evZO6
After I posted i found out that they were 45mm from their site, but that does seem a bit large for a 2.2 cobalt.
Well thats just means my memory was correct. 45mm with 1.2mm-1.3mm tube would get us a 1.71 internal dimension......so maybe my memory is doing okay.....LOL

Either way, 45mm is a tad on the large side for a stock cam, stock compression, factory intake 2.2
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2009 | 08:02 AM
  #31  
HunterKiller89's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-20-06
Posts: 11,183
Likes: 4
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by xxxxsh4d0wxxxx


I'm not 100% on the quality of ZZP.. I've heard the cats blow ass on them.
pretty sure they run a standard magnaflow cat...so cat reliability shouldnt be an issue. If you do go this route, get the 1.5" primary header, not the 1.75" (obviously)
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2009 | 12:33 PM
  #32  
xxxxsh4d0wxxxx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-22-08
Posts: 3,460
Likes: 3
From: New Lenox, Illinois
Originally Posted by Maven
Well thats just means my memory was correct. 45mm with 1.2mm-1.3mm tube would get us a 1.71 internal dimension......so maybe my memory is doing okay.....LOL

Either way, 45mm is a tad on the large side for a stock cam, stock compression, factory intake 2.2
Do you mean intake manifold?
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2009 | 01:41 PM
  #33  
Maven's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-25-05
Posts: 7,661
Likes: 7
From: Southern New Jersey
Originally Posted by xxxxsh4d0wxxxx
Do you mean intake manifold?
by the word intake? yes I mean intake manifold.
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2009 | 01:46 PM
  #34  
MP Cobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 09-02-07
Posts: 4,523
Likes: 0
From: MP, PA (S of Pittsburgh)
get zzp header/dp
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2009 | 01:57 PM
  #35  
jonxxxedge1's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-31-09
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 0
From: depew, ny
Originally Posted by MP Cobalt
get zzp header/dp
agreed. cant go wrong with this
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2009 | 11:29 AM
  #36  
xxxxsh4d0wxxxx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-22-08
Posts: 3,460
Likes: 3
From: New Lenox, Illinois
Originally Posted by Maven
by the word intake? yes I mean intake manifold.
What if one was to get the 2.4 intake manifold and TB? Then would the Vibrant combo be appropriate?
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2009 | 11:35 AM
  #37  
D4u2s0t's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 12-18-05
Posts: 17,838
Likes: 1
From: North Jersey
Originally Posted by xxxxsh4d0wxxxx
What if one was to get the 2.4 intake manifold and TB? Then would the Vibrant combo be appropriate?
no.. unless you want zero low end pull. The vibrant is too big, but you seem to really want it anyway, even though we're telling you not to get it lol.

You want to have a properly sized exhaust for many reasons, one of the main reasons being getting the exhaust gasses out of the pipes as fast as possible. By having an exhaust setup that's too big, you're not optimizing the flow, and your engine has to work harder to push the gasses out. The idea, however, is for the engine to work less hard, that's where you get your power gains from. Making the engine more efficient. That's the whole goal of modding your car, make the engine more efficient. By putting on an exhaust or any other parts that are not properly sized, you're not making the engine more efficient. Which defeats the whole point.

That being said, unless you plan on putting alot of work into your engine, the primaries are going to be too big... factor that in with an exhaust that is probably too big as it is, and you have alot of wasted money for nothing more than a noisy car.
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2009 | 11:40 AM
  #38  
jonxxxedge1's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-31-09
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 0
From: depew, ny
yeah im not too sure you are dying to buy an 800 header and dp combo. theres cheaper out there thats also as reliable as the vibrant
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2009 | 11:42 AM
  #39  
huckernage's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-29-08
Posts: 1,405
Likes: 0
From: quebec city
Originally Posted by xxxxsh4d0wxxxx
What if one was to get the 2.4 intake manifold and TB? Then would the Vibrant combo be appropriate?
yes nice piece. i was able to redone my exhaust setup, i ll be with vibrant with a custom 2˝ mendrel crush.

now
header from lsj
downpipe LSJ with a hiflow cat
custom 2ź not mendrel crush that i can swap two diffenrents exhausts on it
fully bolt on
cam stg2

this setup is able to do 14,25 @ 94mph (w/o my cam stg 2)
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2009 | 02:53 PM
  #40  
Maven's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-25-05
Posts: 7,661
Likes: 7
From: Southern New Jersey
Originally Posted by xxxxsh4d0wxxxx
What if one was to get the 2.4 intake manifold and TB? Then would the Vibrant combo be appropriate?
No. Because A: the 2.4 intake is still a factory intake isnt it? Byoure still stock compression arent you???? C youre still stock cams arent you???

Okay heres the thing, in the end I honestly dont give a **** what you buy.
........You(and lots of other people) come in an ask if part X is appropriate for a build......Myself and others then proceed to make a list of all the reason why it isnt........Then a new question is posed that doesnt really affect ANY of the reasons that were stated why the part isnt appropriate for your build but you wanna know if part X will work now...........Listen, if you wanna buy the Vibrant header, you dont need the blessing or permission of anyone here. Buy the ****** and put it on your completely stock 2.2, dont change ANYTHING, not even your airfilter, no other mods are needed, youll get 217whp. Now you have the answer you want.


I apparently wrongly assume we are all some sort of grown ups here.......dont ask a question of the community if youve already made up your mind on what you wanna do. Its a waste of time and bandwidth.
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2009 | 02:57 PM
  #41  
D4u2s0t's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 12-18-05
Posts: 17,838
Likes: 1
From: North Jersey
lulz
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2009 | 03:01 PM
  #42  
Maven's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-25-05
Posts: 7,661
Likes: 7
From: Southern New Jersey
I truly dont mean to sound like an *******, I do my best to help as many people as possible...thats the only reason I come here. But seriously, even a tiny bit of research goes along way,(asking supercharged guys what the best header is does not constitute research) Pick up a book on basic internal combustion engines,pick up a book a full out race engine design, search the internet and see if you can find if theres a formula to help you come with the answer to your question.
There a lot of people here who are constantly looking for free fish, and precious few who are even remotely willing to learn how to catch them for themselves.
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2009 | 08:15 PM
  #43  
xxxxsh4d0wxxxx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-22-08
Posts: 3,460
Likes: 3
From: New Lenox, Illinois
Originally Posted by Maven
No. Because A: the 2.4 intake is still a factory intake isnt it? Byoure still stock compression arent you???? C youre still stock cams arent you???

Okay heres the thing, in the end I honestly dont give a **** what you buy.
........You(and lots of other people) come in an ask if part X is appropriate for a build......Myself and others then proceed to make a list of all the reason why it isnt........Then a new question is posed that doesnt really affect ANY of the reasons that were stated why the part isnt appropriate for your build but you wanna know if part X will work now...........Listen, if you wanna buy the Vibrant header, you dont need the blessing or permission of anyone here. Buy the ****** and put it on your completely stock 2.2, dont change ANYTHING, not even your airfilter, no other mods are needed, youll get 217whp. Now you have the answer you want.
Yes, the 2.4 is the factory intake, for a 2.4 motor, correct.. But it is not stock for the 2.2..

I am not trying to argue with you but.. "Myself and others then proceed to make a list of all the reason why it isnt........Then a new question is posed that doesnt really affect ANY of the reasons that were stated why the part isnt appropriate for your build but you wanna know if part X will work now".. Well the new question that was posed, does, quite frankly, effect the reason stated, because you said "FACTORY INTAKE".. the 2.4 intake is not "FACTORY" on the 2.2

And the fact that TurboTechRacing has it posted on their website that it fits on the 2.2 and told me that it would be better on a 2.2 than that of ZZP's products.
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2009 | 11:12 PM
  #44  
Maven's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-25-05
Posts: 7,661
Likes: 7
From: Southern New Jersey
Originally Posted by xxxxsh4d0wxxxx
Yes, the 2.4 is the factory intake, for a 2.4 motor, correct.. But it is not stock for the 2.2..
Did i say it wouldnt work with the stock manifold? No, I specifically stated factory manifold, the opposite of a factory manifold would be an aftermarket manifold, not just a different factory manifold.

I am not trying to argue with you but.. "Myself and others then proceed to make a list of all the reason why it isnt........Then a new question is posed that doesnt really affect ANY of the reasons that were stated why the part isnt appropriate for your build but you wanna know if part X will work now".. Well the new question that was posed, does, quite frankly, effect the reason stated, because you said "FACTORY INTAKE".. the 2.4 intake is not "FACTORY" on the 2.2
Youre right, its not factory on the 2.2, but its still a factory intake isnt it? Notice i said "stock" cams, and "stock" compression, but "factory" intake.....maybe there was a reason behind that

And the fact that TurboTechRacing has it posted on their website that it fits on the 2.2 and told me that it would be better on a 2.2 than that of ZZP's products.
Yes, it does fit, it was never stated that it doesnt fit.....just that it wasnt APPROPRIATE.
Heres also where a little bit of research/questions would have gone a long way.......TTR said that what they sell would be better than what ZZP sells......GEE big ******* suprise.

Did you bother to ask TTR why the Vibrant was better for your 2.2 than the ZZP headers were?

Or why it was better than the Pacesetter which TTR also sells?


Or why the Vibrant which has over 1.75" primaries is recommended for the 2.2 when Pacestters 2.2 header is only 1.5"????
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2009 | 11:29 PM
  #45  
jonxxxedge1's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-31-09
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 0
From: depew, ny
dosent the 2.4 mani come on the 08 and 09 base balts?
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2009 | 11:49 PM
  #46  
Maven's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-25-05
Posts: 7,661
Likes: 7
From: Southern New Jersey
Originally Posted by jonxxxedge1
dosent the 2.4 mani come on the 08 and 09 base balts?
The 2009 2.2(LAP) uses the same intake manifold as the 2008-up 2.4L does, yes. But this manifold is different than the original 2006-07 2.4L manifold.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2009 | 01:27 AM
  #47  
xxxxsh4d0wxxxx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-22-08
Posts: 3,460
Likes: 3
From: New Lenox, Illinois
Originally Posted by Maven
Heres also where a little bit of research/questions would have gone a long way.......TTR said that what they sell would be better than what ZZP sells......GEE big ******* suprise.

Did you bother to ask TTR why the Vibrant was better for your 2.2 than the ZZP headers were?

Or why it was better than the Pacesetter which TTR also sells?


Or why the Vibrant which has over 1.75" primaries is recommended for the 2.2 when Pacestters 2.2 header is only 1.5"????
1. The best reason I was given, was the Metallic vs Ceramic cat dilemma.

2. I was under the impression Pacesetter sucked, as per my forum searching led me to believe.

It's alright, I've looked into CIA and I'm confident I would like a combo from them.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2009 | 04:20 AM
  #48  
HunterKiller89's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-20-06
Posts: 11,183
Likes: 4
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by xxxxsh4d0wxxxx
1. The best reason I was given, was the Metallic vs Ceramic cat dilemma.
...really?
Originally Posted by D4u2s0t
The vibrant is too big, but you seem to really want it anyway, even though we're telling you not to get it lol.

You want to have a properly sized exhaust for many reasons, one of the main reasons being getting the exhaust gasses out of the pipes as fast as possible. By having an exhaust setup that's too big, you're not optimizing the flow, and your engine has to work harder to push the gasses out. The idea, however, is for the engine to work less hard, that's where you get your power gains from.
That being said, unless you plan on putting alot of work into your engine, the primaries are going to be too big... factor that in with an exhaust that is probably too big as it is, and you have alot of wasted money for nothing more than a noisy car.
^none of that post did anything for you?
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2009 | 09:16 AM
  #49  
xxxxsh4d0wxxxx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-22-08
Posts: 3,460
Likes: 3
From: New Lenox, Illinois
Originally Posted by HunterKiller89
...really?

^none of that post did anything for you?
Yes, really.

And yes, that post did, but it was not specific as to where it becomes inefficient, however.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2009 | 10:35 AM
  #50  
D4u2s0t's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 12-18-05
Posts: 17,838
Likes: 1
From: North Jersey
Originally Posted by xxxxsh4d0wxxxx
Yes, really.

And yes, that post did, but it was not specific as to where it becomes inefficient, however.
yes it was, read again
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:58 AM.