2.2L L61 Performance Tech 16 valve 145 hp EcoTec with 155 lb-ft of torque

How is this sounding so far..?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 29, 2009 | 08:40 PM
  #76  
huckernage's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-29-08
Posts: 1,405
Likes: 0
From: quebec city
Originally Posted by D4u2s0t
Are you saying that 1/8' makes no difference on the primaries? If so, you should keep out of this conversation.
show me the number that 1,625'' is better that 1,75'' primaries.

you, him and I probably wont notice a different, if we try it
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2009 | 09:24 PM
  #77  
tru2nrtt777's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 02-08-08
Posts: 3,726
Likes: 0
From: Fayetteville/Linden, NC/Myrtle Beach, SC
The dyno will.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2009 | 09:27 PM
  #78  
huckernage's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-29-08
Posts: 1,405
Likes: 0
From: quebec city
yeah, but until someone test it we can put that stand by.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2009 | 11:44 PM
  #79  
Maven's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-25-05
Posts: 7,661
Likes: 7
From: Southern New Jersey
Originally Posted by xxxxsh4d0wxxxx
TRI-Y


4-2-1


^^Both from CIA.

And on such motor, the 1 5/8" primaries are more suitable over the 1 3/4" primaries? Correct?
Yes I would definitely go 1 5/8 over 1 3/4 for your build.

The top header is a TriY or 4-2-1 design, it has 4 primaries that merge into 2 larger secondary pipes, and then into 1 collector. 4, 2, 1.....get it?

The bottom header is a single merge, or 4-1 design, that is all 4 primaries merge into the collector at once.

421 and TriY are different names for same thing.

Youll find TriYs tend to offer noticeable more torque than a 4-1(single merge) design, and more horsepower through the midrange, a 421 will give up some horsepower at the very peak to a properly designed single merge, but IMO its not enough to justify giving up the edge the 421 has down low and in the middle.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2009 | 01:12 PM
  #80  
xxxxsh4d0wxxxx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-22-08
Posts: 3,460
Likes: 3
From: New Lenox, Illinois
Originally Posted by Maven
Yes I would definitely go 1 5/8 over 1 3/4 for your build.

The top header is a TriY or 4-2-1 design, it has 4 primaries that merge into 2 larger secondary pipes, and then into 1 collector. 4, 2, 1.....get it?

The bottom header is a single merge, or 4-1 design, that is all 4 primaries merge into the collector at once.

421 and TriY are different names for same thing.

Youll find TriYs tend to offer noticeable more torque than a 4-1(single merge) design, and more horsepower through the midrange, a 421 will give up some horsepower at the very peak to a properly designed single merge, but IMO its not enough to justify giving up the edge the 421 has down low and in the middle.
Exactly, I read that the 4-1, will be strong up top where a TriY would have peaked already, but, I don't want all of my low end gone and have a dog off of the line and throughout the mid-range.

Now to decide.. High flow cat.. Or cat-less..
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2009 | 02:24 PM
  #81  
huckernage's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-29-08
Posts: 1,405
Likes: 0
From: quebec city
Originally Posted by xxxxsh4d0wxxxx
Exactly, I read that the 4-1, will be strong up top where a TriY would have peaked already, but, I don't want all of my low end gone and have a dog off of the line and throughout the mid-range.

Now to decide.. High flow cat.. Or cat-less..
if you dont care about polution cat-less

Last edited by huckernage; Dec 30, 2009 at 07:14 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2009 | 06:38 PM
  #82  
HunterKiller89's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-20-06
Posts: 11,183
Likes: 4
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by huckernage
if you dont car about exhaust note cat-less
fixxed. lol
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2009 | 07:15 PM
  #83  
D4u2s0t's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 12-18-05
Posts: 17,838
Likes: 1
From: North Jersey
Originally Posted by xxxxsh4d0wxxxx
Exactly, I read that the 4-1, will be strong up top where a TriY would have peaked already, but, I don't want all of my low end gone and have a dog off of the line and throughout the mid-range.

Now to decide.. High flow cat.. Or cat-less..
I think catless sounds like ass on these cars, not worth the extra 2hp in my opinion.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2009 | 01:07 AM
  #84  
xxxxsh4d0wxxxx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-22-08
Posts: 3,460
Likes: 3
From: New Lenox, Illinois
Originally Posted by HunterKiller89
fixxed. lol
So I've heard..
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2009 | 06:13 PM
  #85  
tru2nrtt777's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 02-08-08
Posts: 3,726
Likes: 0
From: Fayetteville/Linden, NC/Myrtle Beach, SC
Originally Posted by D4u2s0t
I think catless sounds like ass on these cars, not worth the extra 2hp in my opinion.
2hp? A properly designed cat doesnt restrict that much unless youre well over 350+

Remember this is a bolt on 2.2 with stock internals.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2010 | 06:47 AM
  #86  
007CobaltLS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-03-07
Posts: 2,098
Likes: 0
From: Blaine, MN
I'm in the same boat as the OP...kind of....

I have a Pacesetter (for the LSJ 1.75" primaries) and an Exhaust Depot catless DP. I also have a stock LSJ cat-back. All of them haven't been installed yet. I'm trying to wait a while as I only have an Injen CAI so far. My end goals are to SC the car. That's the reason I went with the size I did (plus I got a wonderful deal on it from someone here).

My question is this (I didn't read the entire thread)...what will happen with this setup? Being that it's the stock LSJ cat-back it's a little more restrictive than an aftermarket so will it perform a tad bit better than what OP 's would? Would I have any gains in any power band? My goals for right now until the car is paid off are MPG...intake, full exhaust, and a Trifecta tune. Once the car is paid off I plan to put together the SC which probably won't be until at least summer of 2011. Possibly later.

Would I be best off just waiting on installing the exhaust? Also, any opinions as to the sound of the catless DP with the stock LSJ cat-back? Would there be any benefit to just installing the cat-back without the header/dp (in terms of power or mpg)?

Thanks for any help.

Otherwise, if I pick up a Pacesetter with the smaller primaries for now, would that work OK with the catless DP and LSJ cat-back? If so, I'll try to find one pretty cheap that I can install for now and get rid of later when I get the SC setup ready to go.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2010 | 08:37 AM
  #87  
huckernage's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-29-08
Posts: 1,405
Likes: 0
From: quebec city
Originally Posted by 007CobaltLS
I'm in the same boat as the OP...kind of....

I have a Pacesetter (for the LSJ 1.75" primaries) and an Exhaust Depot catless DP. I also have a stock LSJ cat-back. All of them haven't been installed yet. I'm trying to wait a while as I only have an Injen CAI so far. My end goals are to SC the car. That's the reason I went with the size I did (plus I got a wonderful deal on it from someone here).

My question is this (I didn't read the entire thread)...what will happen with this setup? Being that it's the stock LSJ cat-back it's a little more restrictive than an aftermarket so will it perform a tad bit better than what OP 's would? Would I have any gains in any power band? My goals for right now until the car is paid off are MPG...intake, full exhaust, and a Trifecta tune. Once the car is paid off I plan to put together the SC which probably won't be until at least summer of 2011. Possibly later.

Would I be best off just waiting on installing the exhaust? Also, any opinions as to the sound of the catless DP with the stock LSJ cat-back? Would there be any benefit to just installing the cat-back without the header/dp (in terms of power or mpg)?

Thanks for any help.

Otherwise, if I pick up a Pacesetter with the smaller primaries for now, would that work OK with the catless DP and LSJ cat-back? If so, I'll try to find one pretty cheap that I can install for now and get rid of later when I get the SC setup ready to go.
install everythings. dont wait.

install exhaust setup then tune it
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
turbochargedss2012
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
11
Sep 20, 2023 12:17 PM
KMO43
Front Page News
33
Jan 12, 2016 12:01 AM
biniecki
Problems/Service/Maintenance
8
Oct 25, 2015 02:23 PM
jimbofug007
Problems/Service/Maintenance
7
Oct 2, 2015 12:06 PM
DANRICKARD
Problems/Service/Maintenance
8
Oct 1, 2015 12:08 AM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:59 AM.