How is this sounding so far..?
Okay so youre going with Clear Image, fine. Are you going with the 1 5/8" though?
In all your looking around did you notice that there isnt one site that recommends the 1.75" or larger headers for the 2.2/2.4?????
I am a proponent of metallic core catalysts too, Ive seen far too many nonmetallic cats set P0420s straight out of the box.
In all your looking around did you notice that there isnt one site that recommends the 1.75" or larger headers for the 2.2/2.4?????
I am a proponent of metallic core catalysts too, Ive seen far too many nonmetallic cats set P0420s straight out of the box.
according to eric the owner of precisionautocanada only the vibrant give real hp
is anyone has a dyno to test it.....eric has a dynojet and had tested few hearder.
his conclusion was vibrant FTW
http://www.precisionautocanada.com/index.php
http://www.youtube.com/user/Garretts...21/TZPLHU5gysw
this guy has it on his 2.4
http://devilzx.monchar.com/
is anyone has a dyno to test it.....eric has a dynojet and had tested few hearder.
his conclusion was vibrant FTW
http://www.precisionautocanada.com/index.php
http://www.youtube.com/user/Garretts...21/TZPLHU5gysw
this guy has it on his 2.4
http://devilzx.monchar.com/
alot of people have it, doesn't mean it's the best choice for a bolt on 2.2. While it may give a higher peak hp # over stock, it still will not produce as well as a properly sized exhaust, in this case smaller. Though i'm not sure why I'm still trying to explain at this point.
Okay so youre going with Clear Image, fine. Are you going with the 1 5/8" though?
In all your looking around did you notice that there isnt one site that recommends the 1.75" or larger headers for the 2.2/2.4?????
I am a proponent of metallic core catalysts too, Ive seen far too many nonmetallic cats set P0420s straight out of the box.
In all your looking around did you notice that there isnt one site that recommends the 1.75" or larger headers for the 2.2/2.4?????
I am a proponent of metallic core catalysts too, Ive seen far too many nonmetallic cats set P0420s straight out of the box.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: 05-22-08
Posts: 3,460
Likes: 3
From: New Lenox, Illinois
Okay so youre going with Clear Image, fine. Are you going with the 1 5/8" though?
In all your looking around did you notice that there isnt one site that recommends the 1.75" or larger headers for the 2.2/2.4?????
I am a proponent of metallic core catalysts too, Ive seen far too many nonmetallic cats set P0420s straight out of the box.
In all your looking around did you notice that there isnt one site that recommends the 1.75" or larger headers for the 2.2/2.4?????
I am a proponent of metallic core catalysts too, Ive seen far too many nonmetallic cats set P0420s straight out of the box.
Yes I noticed that the Vibrant is quite big compared to the other header/dp combos out there, and I like how Clear Image used Metallic cats.
The vibrant realy give a gains HP
Stock with just K&N intake give 162Whp
With 4-2-1Vibrant combo with down pipe give 170whp
8whp of gains for a header it realy good !!

2.4 Tuned with HPtuner 7000Rpm cut off
Stock with just K&N intake give 162Whp
With 4-2-1Vibrant combo with down pipe give 170whp
8whp of gains for a header it realy good !!

2.4 Tuned with HPtuner 7000Rpm cut off
alot of people have it, doesn't mean it's the best choice for a bolt on 2.2. While it may give a higher peak hp # over stock, it still will not produce as well as a properly sized exhaust, in this case smaller. Though i'm not sure why I'm still trying to explain at this point.
.its time to find a other dyno sheet with same mod but with a other header and downpipe.
since we have no number yet to compare. vibrant gives 8whp, its already good and it not just peak hp but all away up.
2) when were those taken? Same day, same conditions?
3) he says stock and a k&n was 162, but then a header AND TUNE gave him 170. But, it looks like he was tuned prior to the second run because of where the hp drops off. So he's basically able to take more advantage of the header/dp because of the tune.
1) that's a 2.4, not a 2.2
2) when were those taken? Same day, same conditions?
3) he says stock and a k&n was 162, but then a header AND TUNE gave him 170. But, it looks like he was tuned prior to the second run because of where the hp drops off. So he's basically able to take more advantage of the header/dp because of the tune.
2) when were those taken? Same day, same conditions?
3) he says stock and a k&n was 162, but then a header AND TUNE gave him 170. But, it looks like he was tuned prior to the second run because of where the hp drops off. So he's basically able to take more advantage of the header/dp because of the tune.
2)suppose it was same condition
3)so a vibrant untuned wont give much hp that he did according to you
i thing that his first pull was tune but stock exhaust. where is the rev limiter on a 2.4? 6500 or 7000. because you can see his first run finish under 7000 but close.
1)still n/a
2)suppose it was same condition
3)so a vibrant untuned wont give much hp that he did according to you
i thing that his first pull was tune but stock exhaust. where is the rev limiter on a 2.4? 6500 or 7000. because you can see his first run finish under 7000 but close.
2)suppose it was same condition
3)so a vibrant untuned wont give much hp that he did according to you
i thing that his first pull was tune but stock exhaust. where is the rev limiter on a 2.4? 6500 or 7000. because you can see his first run finish under 7000 but close.
421 and TriY are essentially the same, just marketing differences really. A simple bolt on motor is best served by a 421/TriY design as opposed to a more traditional single merge.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: 05-22-08
Posts: 3,460
Likes: 3
From: New Lenox, Illinois
and the 4-2-1 design is opposite, very sensitive to collector more than primary length.
To make the most power, it makes sense to me, that, wouldn't you want to focus on the length of the primaries?
From what I understand.. In the Tri-Y design the primaries are very sensitive to "tuned length"
and the 4-2-1 design is opposite, very sensitive to collector more than primary length.
To make the most power, it makes sense to me, that, wouldn't you want to focus on the length of the primaries?
and the 4-2-1 design is opposite, very sensitive to collector more than primary length.
To make the most power, it makes sense to me, that, wouldn't you want to focus on the length of the primaries?
Without getting into ths for the seventeenth time (its out there, search here or ecotecforum) You dont way a single merge header on a relatively mild small displacement engine because they are very sensitive to exhaust gas velocity and the effects of reversion on the flow.
You can have 35" long primaries but if its a single merge collector its still going to lose some efficiency(and therefore power) to a properly designed shorter primary multi merge header.
I have the SS header and before I put it on over the summer I filled out the collector and on the insides of the primaries from the collector side, would it be bad to take it off and file it down more on inside of the primaries from the side that bolts to the engine block? It should be okay as long as I dont file the edges where it bolts up and seals correct?
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: 02-08-08
Posts: 3,726
Likes: 0
From: Fayetteville/Linden, NC/Myrtle Beach, SC
I have the SS header and before I put it on over the summer I filled out the collector and on the insides of the primaries from the collector side, would it be bad to take it off and file it down more on inside of the primaries from the side that bolts to the engine block? It should be okay as long as I dont file the edges where it bolts up and seals correct?



