2.4L LE5 Performance Tech 16 valve 171 hp EcoTec with 163 lb-ft of torque

Jet Chip Performance Module 1-month Update

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 13, 2008 | 08:44 PM
  #1  
Red07SSNA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-08-06
Posts: 3,511
Likes: 2
From: *
Jet Chip Performance Module 1-month Update

I've had the Jet Chip stage 1 module in now for 1 month. Still no issues, CELs, or problems of any kind. I did take it out one time to get an idea if it really was making more power and could tell the loss of low-end power right away so I put it back in. My gas mileage is a little lower, averaging 24.6 MPG in town whereas without it I was averaging 26.9 -- I attribute this mostly to my quick part throttle take-offs but I think the module itself lowers the MPG becuase it does run richer (I can still smell the difference in the garage when I start it in there).

Anyway, IMO this module is worth the $ if you can't find a "tuner" in your area -- or like the idea of removing a "tune" at any time.

Last edited by Red07SSNA; Jun 14, 2008 at 09:22 AM. Reason: spellcheck!
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2008 | 08:47 PM
  #2  
riko540's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-02-08
Posts: 2,860
Likes: 1
From: South Jersey
hmmm very interesting but some dyno numbers would be awesome.
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2008 | 08:47 PM
  #3  
BLKblurr06's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-16-06
Posts: 1,104
Likes: 0
From: Reynoldsburg, Ohio
you should get the Gtech pro and do a few runs with and without it and see what you come up with..
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2008 | 08:50 PM
  #4  
Red07SSNA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-08-06
Posts: 3,511
Likes: 2
From: *
My plan for the future is to make some runs on an 1/8th mile track (no 1/4 miles anywhere near) and compare with other 2.4L runs.

I did some dyno runs with an auto 2.2 and it wasn't fun. Plus I learned that the dyno operator can "adjust" the readings so I personaly don't trust dynos for proving anything -- the dragstrip doesn't lie.
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2008 | 09:10 PM
  #5  
hubes's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 05-16-06
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
From: NS, Canada
Its interesting that it runs richer, I believe they already run rich from the factory
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2008 | 11:00 PM
  #6  
Red07SSNA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-08-06
Posts: 3,511
Likes: 2
From: *
Originally Posted by hubes
Its interesting that it runs richer, I believe they already run rich from the factory
Don't get me wrong here....in the garage without the module when idling it has a sweet smell but with the module in you can just detect fuel. It doesn't make your eyes water, per say, but you can smell the difference.
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2008 | 11:35 PM
  #7  
xxshadowxx's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 07-12-07
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
From: wisconsin
richer in general = less power
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2008 | 01:50 AM
  #8  
CobaltBuddy's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 03-11-08
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: Gatineau
Still waiting for mine to come in the mail.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2008 | 03:26 AM
  #9  
maverick0716's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-09-07
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 0
From: Chilliwack, BC, Canada
Just because it runs rich at idle, doesn't necessarily mean that it's running rich while you're driving. The load on the injectors (even when stock) at idle is actually quite high on these cars in my opinion.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
turbochargedss2012
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
11
Sep 20, 2023 12:17 PM
KMO43
Front Page News
33
Jan 12, 2016 12:01 AM
Jesse
Parts
15
Oct 13, 2015 09:32 PM
reybalt
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
4
Sep 25, 2015 08:28 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:10 AM.