2.4L LE5 Performance Tech 16 valve 171 hp EcoTec with 163 lb-ft of torque

n/a-turbo exhaust...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 1, 2005 | 03:25 PM
  #1  
celicacobalt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-26-05
Posts: 6,375
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
n/a-turbo exhaust...

In feb I will be buying my catback exhaust and i want one that has a 2.5 inch or bigger pipe diameter but not too big for n/a, im hoping that by this summer i should be putting on a turbo kit but i would really like an exhasut before that that will work well for both applications, and i understand that a smaller than 3 inch pipe is not gonna be the best for a turbo car but im only gonna be boosting conservatively for a long time, thanks for the help in advance.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2005 | 05:58 PM
  #2  
97cavie24ls's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-14-05
Posts: 1,130
Likes: 0
From: phoenix , az
hahn recoemnds to stay with 2 1/4" up to 350 hp range

2 1/2" is plenty big enough for a street driven turbo
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2005 | 06:23 PM
  #3  
Brian MP5T's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-14-05
Posts: 4,425
Likes: 0
From: www.mp5t.com
Werd
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2005 | 08:45 AM
  #4  
celicacobalt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-26-05
Posts: 6,375
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
what about 2.5 on a n/a ss until the turbo kit is on? will it be safe, power loss? what do you think? it might be on there before the turbo for like a year
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2005 | 10:57 AM
  #5  
97cavie24ls's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-14-05
Posts: 1,130
Likes: 0
From: phoenix , az
you should be fine
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2005 | 11:40 AM
  #6  
averagewhiteboy's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 10-23-05
Posts: 8,761
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Originally Posted by Brian MP5T
Werd
I'm not trying to be a dick at all...but what kind of post is that? lol.

Reply
Old Dec 2, 2005 | 01:36 PM
  #7  
celicacobalt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-26-05
Posts: 6,375
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Originally Posted by averagewhiteboy
I'm not trying to be a dick at all...but what kind of post is that? lol.

i think that means he strongly agrees with the previous statement...correct me if im wrong
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2005 | 01:53 PM
  #8  
97cavie24ls's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-14-05
Posts: 1,130
Likes: 0
From: phoenix , az
Originally Posted by celicacobalt
i think that means he strongly agrees with the previous statement...correct me if im wrong

that is the way i understood his comment
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2005 | 03:24 PM
  #9  
aesthetics's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 09-08-05
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: canada
who is going to tune this car? why even throw an exhaust on until the turbo is one? just wondering?
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2005 | 09:35 AM
  #10  
celicacobalt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-26-05
Posts: 6,375
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
well adding an exhaust doesnt mandate tuning the car, of course you could pull out some more horses with tuning but youll still gain power without tuning. now, when the turbo kits come out im hoping to get the garrett one then that will be fully tuned im planning on spending about $1000 for install and tuning
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2005 | 10:40 AM
  #11  
brentil's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 09-21-05
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
From: FL
Originally Posted by celicacobalt
what about 2.5 on a n/a ss until the turbo kit is on? will it be safe, power loss? what do you think? it might be on there before the turbo for like a year
The Solstice 2.4L VVT ECOTEC has 2.5" exhaust tubing by default. I believe it along with the intake are part of how the engine has more stock power then the other 2.4L VVT based cars. So from that alone I'm pretty sure moving to a 2.5" system should more then liekly be beneficial for the stock engine. I also bet the Turbocharged ECOTEC engine coming out next year will be running the same size piping as well.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2005 | 10:59 AM
  #12  
R33P3R007's Avatar
360 L337 User
 
Joined: 08-11-05
Posts: 7,454
Likes: 0
From: Philadelphia, Pa
Originally Posted by celicacobalt
i think that means he strongly agrees with the previous statement...correct me if im wrong
W3RD
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2005 | 11:46 AM
  #13  
averagewhiteboy's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 10-23-05
Posts: 8,761
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
No. I completely understand that. But just becasue I understand what someone's saying I don't post just saying: "Yes.". I only post if I can supply information to the topic, or a valid response. Maybw what I was getting at is to only post if you're going to supply information or a response.

Again, I'm not trying to be confrentational. It's just that I got a warning on one of my other forums for responding like that. That's all.

* shrugs *

Reply
Old Dec 5, 2005 | 02:42 PM
  #14  
celicacobalt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-26-05
Posts: 6,375
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
its all good, any response is better than no response
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Florida 76
How to Guide
82
Apr 24, 2012 09:21 AM
rockkrawler628
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
12
Feb 26, 2009 03:17 PM
kevinj4891
Problems/Service/Maintenance
11
Feb 23, 2009 02:44 PM
ShortStack
2.0L LSJ Performance Tech
6
Aug 21, 2008 09:17 PM
FryLoch
2.0L LSJ Performance Tech
19
Aug 15, 2007 10:27 AM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:46 AM.