2.4L LE5 Performance Tech 16 valve 171 hp EcoTec with 163 lb-ft of torque

rear mounting turbo kit

Old Jan 24, 2006 | 10:13 AM
  #1  
Armorsquadbliss's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 01-09-06
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: Saginaw
rear mounting turbo kit

Aight i just got done reading about a rear mounting turbo kit by STS. They sound pretty interesting but has anyone tried one or tried to duplicate this? Sounds way easier then boosting normally.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2006 | 11:10 AM
  #2  
celicacobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-26-05
Posts: 6,375
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
i dont like the idea of the turbo being in that location myself id rather have it in the engine bay
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2006 | 11:13 AM
  #3  
RaineMan's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-02-05
Posts: 5,446
Likes: 0
From: Salt Lake, UT
that would make for some serious turbo lag...
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2006 | 11:15 AM
  #4  
Brian MP5T's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-14-05
Posts: 4,425
Likes: 0
From: www.mp5t.com
No No No No No!!! Oh No!

Reply
Old Jan 24, 2006 | 11:15 AM
  #5  
06black's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-13-05
Posts: 5,733
Likes: 1
From: the glove
Originally Posted by Brian MP5T
No No No No No!!! Oh No!
wasent there alredy a posts about this????
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2006 | 11:16 AM
  #6  
Cobalt443's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-21-05
Posts: 5,156
Likes: 0
From: Edison, NJ
they put a rear mounted turbo on an ls1 camaro on the "power block" on tv and suprisingly their wasn't any turbo lag difference between the rear mount and the regular one......the rear mount however was a hell of alot easier to install.....if i ever decide to go turbo that's the way i want to go......oh and the horsepower gains were also very similar between the two
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2006 | 11:16 AM
  #7  
BLKSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-28-05
Posts: 2,782
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa
Ive also heard about this kit.... ^^^^ Something we should know?

Is it any good? Kinda balances out the weight don't it?
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2006 | 11:19 AM
  #8  
Ghalterman_usmc's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 04-05-05
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
From: Al Anbar, Iraq
Isn't this the kit that's like 10g or something. I know there was a post about it like 3 months ago, with pictures and everything. I thought the company trashed the idea though??
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2006 | 11:21 AM
  #9  
Chevypowered's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-05-05
Posts: 2,303
Likes: 0
From: Fort Collins, CO
The bad thing is that there is a lot of piping to get all that routed and i wouldn't think that getting water on a hot turbo would be good. plus the exhaust has to be perfext with no leaks and you have to run oil and coolant lines. Seems like more work and more money than its worth.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2006 | 11:27 AM
  #10  
Brian MP5T's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-14-05
Posts: 4,425
Likes: 0
From: www.mp5t.com
Originally Posted by 06black
wasent there alredy a posts about this????

Yes Yes Yes, Oh Yes!
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2006 | 11:28 AM
  #11  
Brian MP5T's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-14-05
Posts: 4,425
Likes: 0
From: www.mp5t.com
Originally Posted by Ghalterman_usmc
Isn't this the kit that's like 10g or something. I know there was a post about it like 3 months ago, with pictures and everything. I thought the company trashed the idea though??

I'll give you 10 Yen
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2006 | 04:09 PM
  #12  
Armorsquadbliss's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 01-09-06
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: Saginaw
STS is selling em for 4 grand and it looks liek they could be made on your own for cheaper since theres no header mod just the turbo and waste gate and mounting any one with some gumption could figure out that. And most people dont ahve any type of fender flaps anyways so whats the difference of the turbo getting hit with water like that or getting hit with water in the engine bay. Plus i hear the piping is a snap. I dunno bout the lag but like posted earlier they say its no problem yall should keep an open mind bout this set up.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2006 | 04:23 PM
  #13  
3fo893013L's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 03-30-05
Posts: 6,980
Likes: 0
Click Here

2nd Gen Turbo Z24 Remote Mount Turbo on stock 3400 w/stock internals

Runs 12's. Wow

I know him from another forum.







Reply
Old Jan 24, 2006 | 04:27 PM
  #14  
NEss/sc's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 12-05-05
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: nebraska
a buddy of mine has one on his camaro and there is not that much lag no different than a regular one and there is less heat in the engine bay plus the distance the tube travles it acts kinda like a iner/aftercooler whatever you wanna call it
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2006 | 04:29 PM
  #15  
3fo893013L's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 03-30-05
Posts: 6,980
Likes: 0
Another member I know. He runs low 14's on 6PSI.

Wagonstein

Click Here

3.1L MPFI w/Garret Turbo from a Grand Prix TGP





Reply
Old Jan 24, 2006 | 04:37 PM
  #16  
BullDog71ss's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-02-05
Posts: 1,322
Likes: 0
From: Mesa, Az
This is what's called a "remote mounted" turbo. They are awesome. Easy to install, very clean, no need for an expensive turbo header, they have much less lag than one might think and they run very cool compared to a standard turbo setup. It also makes your car look stock, just with a CAI pipe coming from a fenderwell.

The only real problem with them is that you would want to build up some sort of skid pad under them, especially on lowered cars that may rub on speed bumps and high curbs and also to keep water from drenching the turbo housing.

Don't knock it if you don't know anything about it. I would much rather have a remote setup than a standard setup if I had a turbo car.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2006 | 06:21 PM
  #17  
Doc's Avatar
Doc
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-11-05
Posts: 9,438
Likes: 0
From: Oceanside, Ca
damn guys....its been on this site Street-Graffiti


and here www.street-graffiti.com

its an awesome setup...you don't have the heat on the turbo that you get when its in the engine bay. Thats what kills turbo cars....heat...the enemy of efficient boost
and if there is enough interest, Dawn will get it made through STS and Stree-Graffiti
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2006 | 06:50 PM
  #18  
Alex47's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-03-05
Posts: 788
Likes: 0
From: new jerzy
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2006 | 07:10 PM
  #19  
Brian MP5T's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-14-05
Posts: 4,425
Likes: 0
From: www.mp5t.com
Originally Posted by BullDog71ss
Don't knock it if you don't know anything about it. I would much rather have a remote setup than a standard setup if I had a turbo car.
Well, now at least everyone who actually knows anything about how a well designed turbo is built will see that you really don't know much.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2006 | 07:13 PM
  #20  
BullDog71ss's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-02-05
Posts: 1,322
Likes: 0
From: Mesa, Az
Originally Posted by Brian MP5T
Well, now at least everyone who actually knows anything about how a well designed turbo is built will see that you really don't know much.

Boohoo, why don't you get all upset about it.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2006 | 07:14 PM
  #21  
Brian MP5T's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-14-05
Posts: 4,425
Likes: 0
From: www.mp5t.com
Originally Posted by Doc
you don't have the heat on the turbo that you get when its in the engine bay.

Thats what kills turbo cars....heat...the enemy of efficient boost
Are you for real?

Heat Kills a Turbo??
Heat is the enemy?


Idiots are the enemy.



Heat is what Spools the Turbo you asshat.

Heat is Power, Heat Is Spool.

"Expanding Gasses From Internal Combustion"


Expanding is where the Heat comes into the factor.

The hotter the better. If it's so hot it will kill a turbo, your pistons will melt first. They are Aluminium, the turbine isn't. The Turbo is Cooled By Water and Fed by Oil. It's rather safe from heat.

Poor Maintenence, Lazy Oil Changes and not allowing a turbine time to slow before swithcing off "Kills Turbos"
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2006 | 07:17 PM
  #22  
Brian MP5T's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-14-05
Posts: 4,425
Likes: 0
From: www.mp5t.com
Originally Posted by BullDog71ss
Boohoo, why don't you get all upset about it.

I don't care if you like it. Just don't fill this forum with Bullshit.

That goes against every design consideration of a well planned turbo engine. If there was a "Perfect Turbo Kit" that would be the opposite.

It is barely better than N/A, that is as positive as I will be about it.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2006 | 07:48 PM
  #23  
BullDog71ss's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-02-05
Posts: 1,322
Likes: 0
From: Mesa, Az
Shut the **** up you peice of ****. Where the hell do you get off insulting people that havent said a god damn thing to you? Just because you think something different from someone else, does that give you the right to call them an idiot, or asshat? No, I think not.

If I was within arms reach of you at this moment I'd reach over and break your jaw you little bitch.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2006 | 07:53 PM
  #24  
p7x's Avatar
p7x
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-15-05
Posts: 5,126
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa
WOOW, I'm relatively new to the basics of forced induction and I know how useless this setup is. I hope porsche Ferrari, and Lambo don't here about this, b4 you guys patent it.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2006 | 08:04 PM
  #25  
Chevypowered's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-05-05
Posts: 2,303
Likes: 0
From: Fort Collins, CO
Yeah if this was such a good setup then why don't car manufacturers use them in all cars? P7X If Porsche got ahold of this great info they would have to run the turbo to the front of the car and shoot the exhaust out the front, might be sweet.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:32 AM.