2010+ Future Cruze Discussions Discussions and information related to the upcoming 2010 Chevy Cruze

Vince buys a Cruze LTZ

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 14, 2010 | 11:14 AM
  #1  
VinceTrifecta's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 04-09-08
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
Vince buys a Cruze LTZ

OK, so I broke down and bought one. Lol. Dark Granite Metallic with black interior. 1.4L turbo with 6sp automatic.

It's a nice car, I'm really impressed. It came with 18" wheels, low profile tires, 4 wheel disc. It's a really nice handling car.

The drivability is terrible, though! When you jump on the gas, it feels like it's being held back, but, finally once you get going, it pulls pretty decently. It definitely feels like it needs some work in the tune (both engine and transmission).

In fact, within days of the Cruze being released, GM released an update for both the engine and transmission so the first thing I'm going to do is see if my car has the update.

It is clear to me this engine was designed for economy over performance - it runs on 87 octane fuel, it runs hotter than most engines to improve economy. All of these things are power-killing.

Over the next month, we'll be doing extensive tuning on ours - I'll be sure to keep everybody up to date and what we're able to achieve!
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2010 | 11:18 AM
  #2  
Chevycobaltss3's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 10-24-08
Posts: 12,836
Likes: 1
From: Vine Grove Kentucky
Sweet deal bro. Hopefully hp comes out with maps for the cruze... huave fun man .....
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2010 | 03:02 PM
  #3  
VinceTrifecta's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 04-09-08
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
Well, just got done doing some logging. There's most definitely room for improvement.

Here's some numbers from the stock tune:

Commanded AFR @ WOT (PE Mode): 10.3:1
Commanded Ignition Advance: 8*
Sustained boost: 15-16psi
Wastegate %: 74% of maximum potential
Engine Coolant Temp: 221*F
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2010 | 03:09 PM
  #4  
ecot3c inside's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: 03-31-10
Posts: 4,212
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL
Originally Posted by VinceTrifecta
Well, just got done doing some logging. There's most definitely room for improvement.

Here's some numbers from the stock tune:

Commanded AFR @ WOT (PE Mode): 10.3:1
Commanded Ignition Advance: 8*
Sustained boost: 15-16psi
Wastegate %: 74% of maximum potential
Engine Coolant Temp: 221*F
omg...
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2010 | 03:10 PM
  #5  
TommyP's Avatar
AWD > FWD
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 04-18-09
Posts: 11,087
Likes: 3
From: Youngstown, Ohio
I'm kinda surprised it runs that much boost. I was expecting a low pressure turbo setup like some saabs and volvos run. I drove a 3.0L turbo 9-5 once that I think only ran like 7lbs of boost stock.
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2010 | 03:16 PM
  #6  
ecot3c inside's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: 03-31-10
Posts: 4,212
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL
what kind of turbo is it again?? seems odd.
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2010 | 03:18 PM
  #7  
TommyP's Avatar
AWD > FWD
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 04-18-09
Posts: 11,087
Likes: 3
From: Youngstown, Ohio
Originally Posted by moranjames89
what kind of turbo is it again?? seems odd.
It's another variant of the K04 I believe.
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2010 | 03:25 PM
  #8  
elecblue06's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 03-19-07
Posts: 14,901
Likes: 1
From: newburgh,ny
Originally Posted by TommypSS/TC
It's another variant of the K04 I believe.
i wonder if it has the same flange .. if it's a smaller version maybe people could plop on the ss/tc turbo and have fun for a cheap upgrade

look forward to seeing what you do with it vince
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2010 | 03:44 PM
  #9  
DSmastery's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 07-09-09
Posts: 9,811
Likes: 4
From: Riverside,CA
im interested sub'd
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2010 | 03:47 PM
  #10  
wollis1's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-01-08
Posts: 776
Likes: 0
From: Windsor, Ontario, Canada
odd that a f/i car calls for 87 octane....
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2010 | 03:51 PM
  #11  
RoelSS's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 04-01-06
Posts: 932
Likes: 24
From: Los Angeles, CA
Nice Vince! Can't wait to see what results you get!
Good Luck
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2010 | 04:14 PM
  #12  
09sscalicobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 01-07-10
Posts: 10,914
Likes: 2
From: ca all day
Originally Posted by wollis1
odd that a f/i car calls for 87 octane....
no its more odd that a TURBO car calls for 87 octane
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2010 | 04:20 PM
  #13  
DSmastery's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: 07-09-09
Posts: 9,811
Likes: 4
From: Riverside,CA
the 87 octane is used as its an econo car

gets high gas mileage and doesnt hurt the bank to fill up the tank

its not a cheap car(~ $24k) haha but it has nice interior and the bells and whistles a consumer that wants a safe and get point A to B car haha
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2010 | 07:26 PM
  #14  
blackvette101's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 09-27-08
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
From: delray beach, florida
Originally Posted by TommypSS/TC
It's another variant of the K04 I believe.
its probably a k03 varient a 1.4l might add too much lag for GM's liking.

Originally Posted by elecblue06
i wonder if it has the same flange .. if it's a smaller version maybe people could plop on the ss/tc turbo and have fun for a cheap upgrade

look forward to seeing what you do with it vince
From what I read there is no flange the manifold and turbo are built together like in one piece to save in weight or something.

Originally Posted by VinceTrifecta
Well, just got done doing some logging. There's most definitely room for improvement.

Here's some numbers from the stock tune:

Commanded AFR @ WOT (PE Mode): 10.3:1
Commanded Ignition Advance: 8*
Sustained boost: 15-16psi
Wastegate %: 74% of maximum potential
Engine Coolant Temp: 221*F
Interesting I wonder how much leaner you can run it and how much more timing/boost with 9.5cr and no direct injection. This engine seems like a prefect canidate for meth

Last edited by blackvette101; Nov 14, 2010 at 07:35 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2010 | 07:33 PM
  #15  
09sscalicobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 01-07-10
Posts: 10,914
Likes: 2
From: ca all day
and yup exactly joey test drove one a few weeks ago at delilo in chevy nice car nice interior handles good but engines all suck ass...and only make a 4 door so far!! boo lol
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2010 | 07:43 PM
  #16  
Kildore's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-18-09
Posts: 1,159
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma
I still need to get my SS/TC tuned by you. im so behind the curve.
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2010 | 08:50 PM
  #17  
VinceTrifecta's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 04-09-08
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
Originally Posted by wollis1
odd that a f/i car calls for 87 octane....
I think this is due to its being targeted towards low fuel costs. It just means there's more on the table for us if we run supreme in it.
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2010 | 08:52 PM
  #18  
VinceTrifecta's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 04-09-08
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
Originally Posted by 09sscalicobalt
and yup exactly joey test drove one a few weeks ago at delilo in chevy nice car nice interior handles good but engines all suck ass...and only make a 4 door so far!! boo lol
The transmission tune was already out of date on my car - I updated to the latest TCM tune and it runs a LOT better. Still pretty laggy though.

It's easy to think it should haul a$$ just because it has a turbo. GM's goal was clearly economy out of the gate, but I do believe there's lots of potential
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2010 | 09:10 PM
  #19  
imphat0260's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 08-16-08
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: STL
Originally Posted by VinceTrifecta
The transmission tune was already out of date on my car - I updated to the latest TCM tune and it runs a LOT better. Still pretty laggy though.

It's easy to think it should haul a$$ just because it has a turbo. GM's goal was clearly economy out of the gate, but I do believe there's lots of potential
Looking forward to seeing before and after numbers..... Good luck with it Vince!

-Ryan
P&P Tuning
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2010 | 09:22 PM
  #20  
19transam81's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 12-05-07
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
From: brighton,michigan
F/I = forced induction, im pretty sure is where he was going with this. But, i can see you thinking he meant fuel injected....

Originally Posted by wollis1
odd that a f/i car calls for 87 octane...

Orininally posted by 09sscalicobalt
no its more odd that a TURBO car calls for 87 octane
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2010 | 09:27 PM
  #21  
ebristol's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 04-15-07
Posts: 5,457
Likes: 3
From: WI
Are you going to get a baseline dyno run Vince?
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2010 | 10:10 AM
  #22  
VinceTrifecta's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 04-09-08
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
Originally Posted by ebristol
Are you going to get a baseline dyno run Vince?
I'm actually headed to the dyno today, but I'm not ready to do any tuning on it quite yet, so I'll probably wait until I am.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2010 | 10:15 AM
  #23  
Eurasianman's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-22-10
Posts: 835
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
Any pics of the car?
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2010 | 10:20 AM
  #24  
VinceTrifecta's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 04-09-08
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
Originally Posted by Eurasianman
Any pics of the car?
Sadly, I don't! I'll take some today and post them if I can get some good light.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2010 | 11:15 AM
  #25  
RiceCop's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: 09-18-07
Posts: 799
Likes: 0
From: Palm Beach, FL
Nice man, I'm going to have to see if anyone down here is interested in tuning one.

(Jerry from SFL)
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:27 AM.