Appearance Body Kits, Hoods, Wheels, Spoilers, Interiors

Cobalt ls

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 31, 2015 | 12:19 AM
  #1  
Cobaltlsguy95's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 11-21-14
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: Montana
Cobalt ls

Have a 2007 cobalt ls looking to mod any ideas?
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2015 | 12:45 AM
  #2  
07blackg5's Avatar
Slobodan Milošević
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: 11-05-07
Posts: 5,959
Likes: 215
From: Serbia
I have a 2.4 intake manifold that will be up for sale very shortly. best mod I did n/a. inexpensive, and proven gains

in all honesty, for under 500 bucks you can get a pretty solid gains on a 2.2. If I could go back, this is what I would do. dont listen to the people who tell you to get an intake or catback for hundreds of dollars.

2.4 intake manifold ~100 bucks shipped
zzp intake tube. uses stock airbox. ~110 shipped
lsj downpipe if you can find one. the 07 2.2 exhaust mani is nicer than the 05-06. 50-100 shipped.
if you are a manual, poly trans bushings ~60

Should net you a realistic 15-20 horsepower for less than the price of a catback exhaust, and only slightly more than a name brand intake. the factory 2.2 downpipe is laughable, and the 2.4 mani is dyno proven to add over 10hp to a car with intake/exhaust mods. This is all coming from someone who has been there, done that with a bolton 07 2.2.

Then you can do whatever from there. short shifter if manual, b@m shift+ if auto, more aggressive brake pads, etc.

I made the mistake of going full bore on my n/a build with expensive intakes and exausts. Like I said If i were to do it again, I would do what I listed above... unless you have huge plans for the car in the future. you might see a few hp more with expensive intakes and exhausts, but for the price/return, it isnt worth it on the 2.2. By a few, I mean maybe 5.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2015 | 01:04 AM
  #3  
Cobaltlsguy95's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 11-21-14
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: Montana
Well I have a cheap little intake but the whole exhaust is still completely stock and its a 2.2 auto
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2015 | 01:06 AM
  #4  
07blackg5's Avatar
Slobodan Milošević
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: 11-05-07
Posts: 5,959
Likes: 215
From: Serbia
Lsj downpipe or any factory fit 2.5" downpipe. And 2.4 intake mani is what I would do firsr personally
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2015 | 01:37 AM
  #5  
Cobaltlsguy95's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 11-21-14
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: Montana
So get start out with a new manifold then go cat back?
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2015 | 01:41 AM
  #6  
Cobaltlsguy95's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 11-21-14
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: Montana
So get start out with a new manifold
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2015 | 01:53 AM
  #7  
07blackg5's Avatar
Slobodan Milošević
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: 11-05-07
Posts: 5,959
Likes: 215
From: Serbia
Downpipe before catback. If you have intake, 2.4 manifold, and a downpipe, a catback isnt going to net you too much more than sound and looks. Maybe 1-2hp. Catback is a lot of money for mininal gain. For a highly modified engine or forced induction, it would be a differet story.

like I said, this is for the best bang for your buck. You could spend a lot more money and not see too much improvement overa smart, but inexpensive setup. A 2.2 will never be fast with basic boltons. For under 500 bucks, this is the best way to add some serious pep without breaking the bank
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2015 | 01:58 AM
  #8  
Cobaltlsguy95's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 11-21-14
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: Montana
And not looking for huge power gains here
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2015 | 03:03 AM
  #9  
07blackg5's Avatar
Slobodan Milošević
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: 11-05-07
Posts: 5,959
Likes: 215
From: Serbia
Save your money and keep it simple. The difference between what I listed and spending 1500+ on "full bolt ons" will only be noticable on a dyno. You would be hard pressed to notice a difference just driving around on the street. Im not saying there isnt more power to be had, its just not economical
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2015 | 12:13 PM
  #10  
Cobaltlsguy95's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 11-21-14
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: Montana
True I wld kinda like to keep my 20 mpgs
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2015 | 12:19 PM
  #11  
07blackg5's Avatar
Slobodan Milošević
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: 11-05-07
Posts: 5,959
Likes: 215
From: Serbia
I meant not economical as in too expensive for the return, not fuel economy. Your fuel economy will improve with basic intake/exhaust mods granted you drive the same
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2015 | 12:31 PM
  #12  
Cobaltlsguy95's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 11-21-14
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: Montana
True
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Superslowbaltt
New Members Check In!!
4
Sep 22, 2015 10:24 AM
Rayray2781@gmail.com
New Members Check In!!
27
Sep 20, 2015 01:52 PM
Bluelightning
War Stories
29
Sep 8, 2015 05:18 PM
jthwjde
Problems/Service/Maintenance
1
Sep 7, 2015 09:24 AM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:48 AM.