i was crying when i wrote it

 

i understand that it all effect the cars performance, but despite the heatsoak he claims, despite him being 1 million feet above sealevel, despite the 30mph head winds, despite everything that god could have done, the car still trapped 104 mph, so all these 'conditions' are pointless

 

who cares about the trap why is it so unbelieveable

 

since when did i say that? this whole argument as about him hitting a 1.9 0 and running a high time, with no proof and no means of backing it up. i could car less if his other chevy does 10s int he quater, its on slicks and its rwd

BECAUSE THE TRAP SPEED PROOVES THE CAR WAS PERFORMING UP TO PAR. TRAPPING WHAT IT ALWAYS TRAPS. HENCE THE CAR WAS NO HEATSOAKING OR PULLING TIMING. 1.94 and a 13.9 does not add up its as simple as that, not with 60 and that trap if he ran a 13.9 @ 98 then it would add up a lil more, but not 104

 

nope it makes sense you just can't believe it. MAybe his clutch slipped

 

ok if his clutch slipped he would not be trapping 104, if he mis shifted he would not be traping 104, if he heatsoaked he would not be trapping 104, if the car pulled timing he would not be trapping 104, if he spun up top and bogged teh 1 2 shift the car would nto be trapping 104.....do you get what im saying here. The trap speed is EVERYTHING when it comes to power. look at a wrx they can hit a 13.9 with a high 1.8 at 96 97 mph. he hit a 13.9 @ 104 with a 1.9 60? no the tree fucked up. But im really waiting for him to shut me up and post the slip along wtih soemthign else even SLIGHTLY clse to a 1.94, ill accept anythign under 2.02


btw i hope u guys dont think im giving any of you a hard time cause you drive cobalts. A few days ago some1 on the ms3 forums claimed to run a 13.7 @ 100 bone stock. Everybody said wow omg amazing can i have your babies....i said bullshit wheres the time slip, kid never responded back. 13.7 @ 100 is once again plaing with 1.9 60 foot times, especially with 4 shifts in the middle

 

you're making baby jesus cry.

 

Squish goddammit, I spit out my ******* soda!

 

When I was stock turbo, wga and 3" dump, I ran a 13.3 @ 99mph...

Traps dont mean ****...

Friend ran a 11.35 @ 126mph...

Exactly....

 

what was your 60?

i can't believe this crap is still going

 

Ibtl Again!!

 

congrats, its called running on slicks, shut down early, or a car that broke on the top end. My guess is that you were on slicks

 

Going and going. What are they arguing about. I want to argue!!!!!

 

on the 13.3 run it was a 1.87 i believe, cant really remember

 

lol thanks, you just prooved my point. 1.87 60 and a 13.3 @ a low 99mph. He went 1.94 and 13.9 @ 104? He trapped higher, got off the line only .07 slower and managed to loose .6 tenths up top WHILE trapping 5 mph faster probably in the 1/8th and in the 1/4. Thanks buddy, your just more proof that im right

 

Your wrong. I dont know why i feel that way but it must be said

 

I officially declare that laloosh takes it in the ass with his mom pushing the *****....then he takes peanut butter and spreads it on his ***** to have his dog lick it off

DUDE SHUT THE **** UP ALREADY

 

if you have some common sense i think you might want to change your answer, or at least read the thread. Theres like 5 million differnt arguemnt in here, but if you curious about the most recent one.....read the last 2-3 pages

 

gto's are slow


::runs::

 

 

Wow that takes a creative mind to think of something liek that....either that or personal experience.

DONT READ THE FUCKEN THREAD IF YOU DONT CARE

 

I eat GTO's





































when they are stopped!

 

And I embarrass them while they're moving

 

Shhhh..... vewy vewy top secret mods!





:runsaway:

 

@ M-DUB