WTF is your problem? why are you being such an *******? I wasnt being a dick to you. I asked legitimate questions and gave the reasons why. After watching that vid several times I can believe its a 15.1 and not a 16.1, but like I said it was definitely under 90mph,and you verified this with the 87.xx I saw something that seemed hokey and pointed it out. Perhaps you could have just told me what the time/speed was when I originally made the comment and this wouldnt have gotten like this.

As far as your number on the car, I dont see it in any of the vids I watched so youll have to give me some slack for not knowing your track number,

So to recap, I saw one timeslip, two videos that didnt match the timeslip, one with no time or track number visible in vid and the other with a slower ET and MPH than the slip and still no sign of the track number and I wanted to know how you claimed your spot on the board.

Yeah, obviously some evil plot there.

Ive never talked **** about your car or you, I dont think Ive ever personally attacked you or called you names or in any other way acted inappropriately towards you, yet you always address me with such contempt. I think your "14 seconds" of fame are going to your head. I hope thats all it is and when you reach your ultimate goal youll regain your perspective and be able to get off of the soapbox youve been carrying around.


/done.

 

not ours, its a digi camera and once you start recording thats all you get for zoom

When we first started talking about this i did not know what vid you were watching, Im sorry I didnt realize this sooner and post the slip. that run was not the best no, and now that we have that settled your concerns make more sense.
I have now realized that my number was not visible...i thought they were, but they are not. I will do my best to get the video showing the time and my nubmer of the best run this weekend and I am hoping to get a time near or at the top of the list, and I think that if the conditions and my driving are right, my car is perfectly capable of some low 14s

I do apologize for my arguments, alhtough you may not have intended on coming off as harsh and attacking, that is what I took it as and that may not have been right. I know my car isnt the be all and end all of the world, and I know I am not the upmost and best cobalt owner. that being said, I am proud of my car and I do believe it can get some great times and surprise some people once I get some practice in with it.

No one has to respect or like me if they dont want to, but alot of times it seems like anyone with a 2.2 or some suprising results is fighting an uphill battle and is guilty until proven inocent...







also, forgive me as i was drinking while posting last night

 

ahahahahaha 13,5 at what speed 102 mph

I will do a 13,5 +-95 mph

will be still fast enough with a 13,5 with just a 95mph and so

 

exactly, cant with my fujifilm either, sister lost my real video camera

 

today it a sad day

 

??

props. 13.5 is that line from quick to fast for me.

so u'll be fast in my book, i don't care how fast you tear through the end at, **** hit the brakes at the end if u wanna, run a 13.5 @ 85mph for all i care. lol

 

95 mph will not get you a 13 second pass even with a 1.8 60'. Your trap speed will need to be a 100+.

 

14,585 92,36
15,081 90,14


that is my data. 0,5 sec with a 2 mph fster

13s' at 95 sound realiste


traction is not a issue for me

<1WhiteSSTC, 14.42@100.50 almost same time but way faster. traction issue

 

The faster you go, the more MPH you need to knock off time. With your theory you could run 10.0 @ 110 MPH. Some how I don't see that happening. Your math is serverly flawed, just like your physics. Did you graduate from high school?

 

your both wrong because yourlooking at all of this as linear....and its very much not

 

wut.. slow was not looking at it linearly .. thats what he was correctin hunkerage about..

 

Thank you!

 

right, but say one of us could get up to a decent speed such as low 90s quicker and hold that for longer instead...like the difference between an elec and gas powered, the elec will show a quicker et at lower speed cause it gets there faster...this isnt a linear type of acceleration or speed...it all depends on where you get your power, how much low vs high, if you get up to speed quick or build through out....you can just say a lower speed will mean you CANT do it...he can.

main thing would be, if he had alot of tq but not so much hp, he would get up to his speed quick, and be able to hold that longer but not increase as the hp doesnt allow him to....

it is possible although since we are all dealing with the same car we all are arouuuund the same tq curves. But comparing boosted to na and sc to tc doesnt work for just that reason, compeletly diff tq curves and overall hp

huck was wrong cause he was looking at it as a linear type, slowswap was wrong because of my last explanation...you dont necc need to go that much faster to knock the time down, if you can cut a bunch of bs off the beggining of the run and get up to speed quicker (even if it isnt a higher speed) youll improve your 1/4 time

 

I think you're trying to say the same thing I am but just thinking way to much into it.

 

its a good possiblity hahaha

basically if you make your speed before the 1/8, lets say you make 85mph in the 1/8 mile and then only gain 10mph in the back end, youll run a faster et with lower mph then lets say a guy who runs 75 in the 1/8 and gains 25 in the back end...higher mph but most likely lower et, i cant be sure on that cause again, its not linear, but that is the gist of it lol

 

All I'm implying is that the faster you make it down the 1/4 mile the more speed you'll need to gain, expoentially.

You're just thinking way to deeply into this.

 

meh.

 

tech in wood processing

this tech is for sawmill industries.

5 years ago I have drove by oregon. very nice place for sawmill. I have seen some.

very nice state btw


maybe to linear. I am not that good in math but what should be my Mph in a 13's if my 14,58 is at 92,3mph

I said +-95 and im linear

you know what.... when I ve seen my fisrt mid high 14' I was hoping a 95 mph but suprised by a 92,3


pont rouge has a 4feet higher finish. going up is not the best way to get mph.

napi is more flat than pont rouge

 

nwea

performance mods: Ebay CAI,2.4l intake mani, 2,4l tb, lsj injectors, stage 2 comp cams, shaved head .020"
lightweight MRZ crank pulley, Lightwieght MRZ alt pulley,
clear image 4-2-1 header, clear image catless 2.5" dp, clear image 3" exhaust w/ straight through style muffler on the end




you call me unsafe : maybe I will kill just me

I call you unsafe for our environment. but with your setup (7up) you will kill more people with your green gas<


and btw

province of Quebec is the exhaust on north america: why cause high wind altitude bring all green gas from you guy to north east states and provinces.

it a consequence to born a child with 7 arm and 1 leg.

lets go and pollute

that is unsafe for us





and on sunday people will be suck how low I will set the bar on this coming sunny sunday. lets pray for something happen to me but you will toast something rare

 

good luck with that im racing tomorrow

and...my car is tuned, so it really doesnt spew that much,
annnnnnd, cows are scientificaly worse then my car, so go vegan before bitching about my exhaust

 

that right I have seen that on tv couple year ago.


good luck today

 

Just to add about the discussion of ET and time correlation. Just think of it as power under the graph, like on a dyno. the quicker you get up to speed, the faster your time will be, but not necessarily your speed.

 

what up. how was your day

 

shitty, was 95* out and decent high humidity. couldnt get it.
i did however beat a modded mustang with a 302 mult times.
but for an example, a mustang GT hooking well (auto) was running low 15s all night...and the guys with the high HP drag cars were having to reinjector and retune their cars at the track. Had a good time, but my day will come how did yours go?

shitty, was 95* out and decent high humidity. couldnt get it.
i did however beat a modded mustang with a 302 mult times.
but for an example, a mustang GT hooking well (auto) was running low 15s all night...and the guys with the high HP drag cars were having to reinjector and retune their cars at the track. Had a good time, but my day will come how did yours go?

 

not bad. my lowest 14,701.

windy and no traction. it was rainy all week so it have washed all glue on 60'.

what was your time btw