so you prooved me right. You trapped 104.8 in the 1/4 but 97 in the 1000? according tot he bullshit track. 82 in the 1/8th and 84 in the 1/8th over there. Am i misisng the big deal here? Cause according to me you just prooved me right.

Btw what the **** is the big deal here. He hit a 2.0-2.1 on drag radials. Do you people realize that you can do that easily on street tires. Im seriously missing the point here i guess.

Good job on a normal time? I guess

 

nice job

the time slip is identical to a stock LS1 A4 F-body... way to go!!

 

The car you all were arguing about before was not Stu's car , it was his buddy's Black SS with quite a bit more mods .

 

no, i never said anything about back06ss or whatever his sn was. I actually went in his thread and said GJ. It ws always about stu's car. Like i said, he just prooved me right and i dont see the big deal with this time on drag radials.

 

So if a GM Stage 2 runs a 13.3 - 13.6, would a ZZP Stage 4 Run in the 12s?

 

I think this proved both of you wrong, at least according to the last thread about all this I read. https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/drag-racing-52/another-pb-even-though-noone-cares-101594/

You claimed his track was bogus, but this shows pretty damn similar numbers from what I can tell. You said you would also shut up about it if he ran a mid 13.

However he claimed he would be good for 12.9-13.1 @ 107-109. He ran a 13.3 @ 104.8, not what he claimed he would run, but good none the less.

 

wow ,how much u charge for lessons?lol

 

agreed

and ladouche yet again you refuse to read and understand facts that contradict your view. i said there was a very very strong headwind that was killing everyone there. there is absolutely no doubt in my mind that 13.1's at 107 were in the car. i did exactly what you said i could not so STFU

 

Listen to me, i was mainly comparing a ms3 that ran at that track. That ms3 ran a 10.8 @ 97 or 98mph int he 1000. I ran a 10.8 in the 1000 and a 12.9 @ 111 in the 1/4. According to that track I picked up 14 plus mph in the last 320 feet? YEA RIGHT LOL. Just like stu who trapped 97-99 and 104-105 in the quater. HEs picking up a whole 5-8mph. Your telling me my car pulls hard enough to double his gains in the last 320 feet when we are identical in the 1000? Yea right...that track is still bogus. And for the record i said he will run mid 13s he was claims high 12s. Guess who's right.....surpirse again right.

 

good job man .. i wish i could get my balt to do that! i bet your exicted about getting into the 12's this summer

 

13.3 is NOT typical of a stage 2 cobalt. 13.6-13.9 are about the best times people see with similar mods.

Anyways, congratulations Stu. Thats amazing.
however at the same time that im happy for you, I'm pissed at my car. I had almost the exact same mods, good tune, cut 2.1 and 2.2 60' all day long, and my car is still a full second slower. Yet to come close to 13s. im not at a high altitude, don't suck at driving, and my car is slow My car just hates me.

 

I don't want to get involved in this argument. But I do just want to correct you here. getting a 2.0-2.1 60ft. on street tires is near impossible with these cars. We have NO LAG to help us down low. It's just instant power with the supercharger. Plus he is on 18" drag radials which still isn't the best for dragging. So his 2.0 is about right.

Other than that, I'm not gonna get involved in this argument. have a nice day.

 

I had no lag in my other fwd NA cars and pulled low 1.92 not high 2.0s. Tell you what, ask d4tu to let me do 2 PULLS in his car at the strip. If I cut a 2.0-2.1 on whatever pos tires he has on there, this argument will get put to rest.

Just as an example my buddy and I went to the track back when i had an intake. He has rsxs with all the bolts ons and couldnt for the life oh him get out of the 2.3 60 range. Blaming his tires left and right. The rsx and the ms3 have the same bolt pattern so he gave me his wheels. First run ever on them was 2.12. Yes i know an rsx has no lag, but you cant even begin to tell me that an rsx or ss/sc makes more torque or power than my car esp with my stupid short gearing.

dont mind the gay video, its just proof and he likes to make funny vids.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Emljw2FuZzg
Notice the different wheels

 

until you try to launch an ss s/c at the track, there is nothing you can say that will make me believe. I could cut low 2.1's and an occasional 2.0 60ft. in my wife's lancer ralliart. 160hp FTW. lol. And in the cobalt, I couldn't get better than 2.3's. So I have ET streets now. Screw the big heavy 18" crapness. 16" slicks are the way to go.

 

I drove Kevins car in an emergency, i will admit it spins easier than my esp being that he doesnt have an lsd, but like i said i've own and driven cars liek this before wihtout any problems. Maybe kevin will let me have it a go, however i want to sign a piece of paper saying that i am no responsible for broken axles

 

good idea.

 

I know kevin is on here alot and i dunno if its true but he said that one time 5 cobalts went to a track that i run at and all 5 snapped axles. That right there would scare me away from running his car and getting his stranded 2 hours away from home.

Btw stu im not here to bash you....i predicted mid 13s and you ran mid 13s. I predicted the 1000 track to be off, and its obviously off. So whats with the hate and name calling

 

that's when you need a civic to go with you. LOL. check this thread out.

https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/drag-racing-52/ralliartist-track-day-101718/

 

Just wait.... I'll beat it one day...

 

God you are a moron. there is no way in hell i trapped 97mph in the 1000 on this run. i was off an entire 2 mph in the 1/8 WITH A HUGE HEADWIND THAT YOU STILL REFUSE TO ADDRESS. the track is not bogus, all 4 people that went with us ran identical times that they would have run at the other track minus the headwind.

again, you said you would shut up if i didnt run mid 13's, and i didnt. i ran low 13's just like i said i probably would so you need to shut the **** up. otherwise, you will not only be an insanely moronic stubborn douchebag, but now you will be an insanely moronic lying douchebag. if you do no think the headwind of 20 mph stopped me from running around a 13.0-13.1 at 107-108 then its quite apparent you are exactly as most everyone on here sees you.

and for the record, i dont think a 2.09 is a great 60, even though my car is an open diff on 18's. this was the first time ive run at this track in like 7 months. even though you dont think there is any sort of dial in (tell that to an nhra team), there is and i never got really dialed in. so be it
how is a 13.31 (nearly a 13.2) a mid 13? are you really that bad at math as well? the 1000 wasnt off. as soon as you pull your damn head out of your ass ill stop making fun of you. i have a feeling that john force could walk up to you, say something about drag racing, and you would tell him he was wrong. you are quite possibly the most idiotic stubborn person ive ever met on the internet. a 13.3 is a low 13.

LADOUCHE PLEASE ADDRESS THE 20MPH HEADWIND. and by address i mean, how much do you think that would throw off a car in et and trap.

 

You stated it was a bogus track. Then when he runs in the quarter at a different track with similar times you still state because a different car couldn't do what he did, its still bogus. This is why e-racing other people's cars is major fail.
Your statement on turbo lag helping 60s is not correct. You can't cut a good 60 if you don't have the power to do it, turbo lag does not help unless you are just a pedal smasher. Its nothing more than tire compound, track prep, vehicle design and a driver to find the boundaries of traction. If you want less power off the line, use less throttle.

You can cut a 2.0 60ft on our cars with 2.5 pullies and stock tires.

 

interesting isnt it?

 

nice times man...

 

thank ya sir

 

I'm speaking from personal experience. It really is easier to just go by some drag tires.

Again, nice times Stu, I'm sure you'll do even better when there isn't such a huge headwind.