Quickest all motor 2.2?
What was your trap?
09-11-2008, 06:28 PM
#81
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: 08-18-07
Location: Rochester NY
Posts: 1,098
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yeah i had really really bad wheelhop at the line i tried alot of dirrerent methods. I think my next purchase will be the solid front motor mount.....and btw i won the street class and i was the slowest one there...i won 6 rounds
09-11-2008, 06:32 PM
#82
93mph in a probably 3200lb car sounds like 180hp+ to me man...not bad.
Youre good tires, a wicked launch and a tailwind away from being the first in the 14's.
Youre good tires, a wicked launch and a tailwind away from being the first in the 14's.
Last edited by Maven; 09-11-2008 at 06:32 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
09-11-2008, 06:35 PM
#83
Senior Member
Join Date: 10-06-05
Location: Seneca, South Carolina
Posts: 10,944
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
I don't think the intake manifold was a failure. You gained over 3mph in trap speed. That's what you want. Now you just need to work on your launches. Get some good tires and you'll be 14's no problem. 93mph trap is about 180+whp BTW. You are probably over 200 crank hp.
what was your 1/8th mile et and trap speed?
what was your 1/8th mile et and trap speed?
Last edited by ralliartist; 09-11-2008 at 06:35 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
09-11-2008, 06:43 PM
#85
Senior Member
Join Date: 10-06-05
Location: Seneca, South Carolina
Posts: 10,944
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
man, I don't see what to complain about. You gained everywhere! especially the top end! Don't take the intake manifold off.
you need tires now to utilize the power better.
you need tires now to utilize the power better.
Last edited by ralliartist; 09-11-2008 at 06:43 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
09-11-2008, 06:48 PM
#87
Senior Member
Join Date: 05-16-06
Location: CT
Posts: 6,298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
3mph gain is pretty decent though considering its basically a canned tune. When you get a chance, throw it on a dyno and see how much more power than stock cars you are making.
09-11-2008, 06:56 PM
#89
Senior Member
Join Date: 10-06-05
Location: Seneca, South Carolina
Posts: 10,944
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
dude, 3mph IS A LOT for a N/A 4 cyl car to gain from just an intake manifold and tuning. I don't see what there is to complain about. In all seriousness, you pickup up about 20-30whp. maybe even a tad more.
09-11-2008, 06:57 PM
#91
Senior Member
Join Date: 10-06-05
Location: Seneca, South Carolina
Posts: 10,944
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
If you are wanting 100+mph traps, then you need F/I. It's not gonna be easy getting there N/A.
and you beat me too it. lol. Boost will be way cheaper than trying to go really fast n/a.
and you beat me too it. lol. Boost will be way cheaper than trying to go really fast n/a.
09-11-2008, 06:59 PM
#92
Senior Member
Join Date: 05-16-06
Location: CT
Posts: 6,298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeah, if you want a trap that high you probably need a Patriot performance head, comp stage 2 cams, and a race gas tune. lol
Boost it after you become the first n/a 2.2 on here to get into the 14's.
Boost it after you become the first n/a 2.2 on here to get into the 14's.
Last edited by XM15; 09-11-2008 at 06:59 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost