trucks don't exactly do very good from a roll. the only way it's running 13's is due to its sub 2.0 60 ft.

 

See man, we believe you. Don't let the haters bring you down!

 

by the way the 40 series flowmaster is a full exhaust... i had it on my 85 mustang. it sounds mean on that car but i donno what its doin on a balt...

 

Is it 40 series muffler or 40 series muffler system?? There is a difference there. I'm sure that Flowmaster does not have a cat-back system for our cars. He could have a 40 series muffler with 2.5" (hypothetically) piping. I could be wrong though

 

I know when I had a 40 series on my Cavi it did 2 things real well
#1 made tooooo God damn much noise! It resonateed thru the car horribly!
#2 at around 4000rpm the car would actualy take off due to the scavenging effects of the muffler. It netted me just a tad over a tenth in a 1/4 mile but it made my ears bleed!

 

ok a 40 series is just a muffler, i ran it on my balt for over a year. guess what? its a terrible muffler, its flow rating is way below most other products out there. dynomax ultra flo is a much better muffler

 

Wow your the first person who's called Flowmaster a horrible muffler! I've run em all my big block cars for their scavenging effect. Dynomax may flow more on a bench but on a car where the exhaust presure changes the Flowmaster has that negative presure chamber that pulls the exhaust out of the engine once the flow gets high enough. All I know is Flowmasters are about the only muffler that will drop underhood temps, make more HP and even drop the engine's temp.

Not saying Dynomax are bad but for serious HP cars you can't beat Flowmaster.

 

Still waiting on the Dodge Truck troll to come on here and call us all
gay chevy tuner fanboys.

Good race though, set it up again, get it on video.

 

so have you seen in actual numbers a flowmaster out perform a dynomax? i can tell you first hand that my car picked up some noticeable topend power when i switched to the dynomax

 

they aren't... if i'm spending $70,000+ on a car it better run better than 13's (~12's at sea level). they handle very well, and have great top end. thats where they shine, they are a good road race car, not a good drag race car. Yes, they are faster than 99.9% of all cobalts, but I couldn't really call a cobalt a fast car either. respectable, yes. fun to drive, you bet. fast, eh, not really.

maybe its my baisis against mopar, or the majority of the people that drive them, but I really don't like vipers.

 

YUP...500HP...Give me a break

 

exactly I'm confused, but I do know the 40 series is only a muffler, and not a cat back. I posted a link on the first page. It was a common muffler with the H-pipe set up on stangs

 

I can believe you on this one no problem! Good run.


Oh and a side note the 1/4 mile time you quote for the SRT-10 truck is a car with a professional driver and uber tuned by Dodge before it got tested so the number is likley skewed some .1 -.3 or so.

 

you are a riot man! 13's? 13's?!?!?! you either have some of the shittiest drivers of all time driving those or are racing on ice.

http://www.caranddriver.com/roadtest...upe-page3.html

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...pe/index3.html

 

Hot Rod did tests years ago and you have to remember it was years ago that I had my big block Trans Am so if things have changed then I am not aware of it. I just wonder how a Dynomax can outflow a muffler that actualy sucks the exhaust out of the engine.
Not flaming, not starting anything I'm just curious is all. I don't tend to believe ever hyped manufacturers test I go for the more un-biased tests performance magizines do.
Hell Flowmaster even has its own NHRA series of cars!

I said the same thing about Flowmaster!

 

uhhhhh where do you get that?

 

The mph is all you look at when talking roll racing. I know he sucked, and likely so did this guy. 95mph is not going to beat much. They are not Vipers, that is for sure.

 

it's not impossible. Despite the Ram's 500hp, don't forget to take into consideration its weight

 

You dont know what yourtalking about man. I have a friend who writes and reviews for motor trend online and does test car segments and has confirmed this on numerous occasions with manufacturers. When you are comparing your car in a competitive arena why would you use retarded logic and bring out the slower car??? So you dont sell more cars and your competitor does??


The cars they bring out are the ones that are the best of the best of what they have to offer. Look at the issue of Sport Compact when the STi was being tested.They had an STi running in the 13's in stock trim and people on the street complained when they took their cars to the track they could not best the time.

 

I raced a srt10 truck the other week and from 30-100 (wouldn't race from a dig ) we were DEAD EVEN. They honestly arent that impressive if you ask me, come on, a sunfire hung with it.

 

N/ADC5 im glad you posted this, i was about to mention that guy, and belive me it was not very impressive...

 

You both call BS, but you forget a few things.

1) This guy is not the only member to post a kill on a SRT-10. People have had better races with them.

2) They're heavy as all hell!!

3) No weight to get the power to the back wheels. they're not all that fast, OR aerodynamic.

Though there is also the fact the guy could have not be that good of a driver, but still. Give him credit.

 

i agree with you i just thought if someone swapped all the fiberglass and **** on one of those trucks for carbon fiber a full carbon fiber body, we all would be fucked

 

LOL that would be expensive

 

but extremely fast