I think both of you tune in your own ways. I am tuned by someone here in St. Louis that does a very good job and it's also a different way. I've seen your tunes BYT, they are good. What needs to be done is, you both just need to drop it. Both have claimed great numbers and have happy customers. Leave it at that. Comparing who's e-Tuning dick is bigger isn't proving anything but taking up bandwidth.

Also, BYT, if you go to the GM Tuner Bash, I have some questions for you and maybe a favor, you can PM me if you want. It's something to do with your tuning capabilities.

 

I couldn't agree with this more.

 

i need to redyno...

 

you need to get the car back first spanky. lemmie know when you wanna do it. i'm curious.

p.s. kids. a 31lb/min turbo on the lnf runs out of power just a hair over 330whp. map it. id love to find a happy dyno that some people on here get

 

I notice this thread gets recreated every so often. Was just wanting to put in a little suggestion. How about a standard correction factor when this thread is recreated? i've seen SAE, STD, uncorrected, etc... I would recommend SAE correction as its the standard for car manufacturers. that's all

 

Well a lot of people don't know about correction factors. They get what the shop gives them, which is usually std.

 

Yea, I'm just going to post whatever the forum member gives me. Trying to get the same correction factor is getting too complicated. Most people aren't going to even know what correction factor their dyno is.

The thread gets recreated because after a certain period of time, you can't edit your posts anymore unless you are a mod. And I somehow doubt css.net admin wants to make me a mod, LMFAO.

 

well, i noticed for your 1/8th and 1/4 mile thread, you put the 60' in the mods list. Can't you put the correction factor for these? it will get people aware of correction factors and than maybe a trend to pick one and stick with it. I mean, how hard is it for the customer to tell the shop to apply a different correction factor? It would be nice if we were comparing apples to apples.

 

I'll start asking for correction factors. I think you are right in that it will only better the list. But I'm not going to go back and fix everyone's dyno post.

 

my dyno sheets are SAE

 

ZZP uses STD and they are on top. Most people use STD for that reason.

 

you forgot to add only in the world of lsjs everyone uses std

 

im going to start dynoing in JIN

 

Most of our dyno testing is done in sae. My LNF 530whp was sae. Our 510 twincharge was sae. Our 356 LE5 dyno was sae. I often post both sae and std for comparison purposes.

din?

We thought that about the 3800 market. I think it's just inevitable. Everyone wants a higher number. Personally, I don't care what anyone uses as long as they disclose which correction was used.

 

I dyno in my pants

 

Mine is the donkey dick dyno plot. The other is a buddies overlayed.

 

awesome man, can't wait to come back and take a ride in it.

 

correction factors should definitely be posted. My graph was SAE but the person directly underneath me in the stock blower 2.0 section obviously used STD

 

i think people need to stop crying about correction factors and spend moe money to make power.

 

agreed

 

Ralli,

Can you add me to the top of the list?

ebristol 303whp, 273wtq Verified DynoJet F, H, DP, CD, E, T, DU, 80s, 2.6", M62, HE, E-85

 

so you are the first one to hit 300 whp on a m62

 

With the stock long block. Yes.

But I heard rumors that other people have done it but I don't see any proof in this thread.

 

wow that drops over 100 wtrq from peak to redline..

 

Torque line looks like a stock turbo LNF, haha.