General Cobalt General Cobalt, Pursuit, and Ion talk. Post specific discussions in the forums below

08 turbo cobalt rumor

Old Oct 2, 2006 | 03:56 PM
  #26  
ItalianJoe1's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: 11-01-05
Posts: 12,462
Likes: 61
From: Miami, FL
I spoke with my GM product rep today, and all he would say is that they are gonna change the Cobalt a little for 2008, but i couldn't get any specifics out of him.
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2006 | 05:42 PM
  #27  
SilverSS/SC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-03-05
Posts: 4,272
Likes: 0
From: South Bend , Indiana
Originally Posted by DJMKAFKA
THAT WAS MY MAIN POINT... WHY WOULD THEY? IT WOULD BE REALLY STUPID OF GM TO GO TURBO IN THE FIRST PLACE... WHEN WAS THE LAST TIME GM HAD A TURBO IN ANY CAR?
THEY ALREADY HAVE DONE IT !!!!!! .....in case anyone missed the pictures of a couple HHR's (same chassis as us ) doing emissions testing with a pack of Soltice GXP's and Sky Redlines . Both HHR's had large front mount air to air intercoolers . No theres no official word , but youd have to have your head in the mud if you think the HHR SS will have the 2.0 turbo and the Cobalt will keep the LSJ . Its gonna be hard to find info pertaining to a Cobalt , but look for stuff on the HHR SS . GM has a few high profile important new production cars and a few RWD concepts this auto show season ....a mild exterior refresh and a engine change for a Cobalt wont even be close to a focal point of mention until probabaly some time mid next year just before it comes out .

Heres why the cobalt is gonna lost in the mix this auto show season

Production Debuts
2008 Malibu
2008 Caddy CTS
2008 Pontiac RWD sedan ....aka Holden Commodore SS-V
The long awaited Blue Devil Corvette
08 Saturn Vue
08 Buick Lacross Super ( LS4 V8 )
08 Saturn Astra
Camaro

Concepts
2 RWD sedans

Rumored but not official
Caddy CTC coupe
Camaro Convertible
production ready Solstice coupe
small Holden Torana based Pontiac sedan
HHR SS

GM has game this year

If you wanna check on the cobalt though a site called cheersandgears.com would have info before any mag or net site would .
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2006 | 05:49 PM
  #28  
Omega_5's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-01-06
Posts: 5,134
Likes: 0
From: Maidstone, SK
A little insider news (from a buddy at the GM research center in Miflord).
The 2 RWD's are based on the Caddy line-up. I think he said one is a Buick, and the other is a Pontiac. Basically cheaper versions of the CTS.
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2006 | 06:02 PM
  #29  
Mercury's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-28-05
Posts: 4,194
Likes: 0
From: Wilmington, DE
No auto manuf. would ever only have a 3 year run with an engine. It will not happen. At least in 09 and that is still in question. The reason the Cobalt SS is unique is because it is a little muscle car... Supercharged. Everything out there is turbo... Instant boost with a supercharger on this small little eco car is a great combo.

If GM makes the cobalt turbo, then thats great... You will see just as many idiots with just blow off valves as SRT-4's.

And for all the people who say "Oh... I'm just gonna trade in my SS/SC for the SS/TC when it comes out. Why?? You will lose so much money due to depreciation.

Don't expect the price tag of a "turbo cobalt" to be as low as the SS/SC's either. It will definietly start around $24k.

Also, have fun paying more for insurance on a car rated at 260hp.
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2006 | 06:13 PM
  #30  
SilverSS/SC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-03-05
Posts: 4,272
Likes: 0
From: South Bend , Indiana
....it wont be the Pontiac . Pontiac is no longer using the US Zeta chassis . The production ready Pontiac will there along with the 2 Zeta RWD sedans . Cadillac wont be using a Zeta car simply because its a cheaper version of its own exclusive Sigma chassis .
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2006 | 07:46 PM
  #31  
red_wing_2121's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-25-05
Posts: 1,244
Likes: 0
From: Sterling Heights, MI
Originally Posted by -Jayson-
just doesnt make sense, GM would have to under sell itself base GXP is 27,000 and a base SS is 21,000. It just doesnt makes sense to under sell itself like that. I mean that would be like putting an LS7 engine in a Malibu. But if GM does do it cool, but i dont really see the point again because both engines are dynoing around the same HP. Its not gonna feel like a 55HP gain.
Don't forget, the Solstice and Sky are both RWD, which is more exspensive to build. Plus, they are both for a niche market which allows them to have a higher price than the car is probably actually worth.
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2006 | 07:52 PM
  #32  
-Jayson-'s Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-28-06
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 1
From: Michigan
can anyone name an engine that GM made that was praised by many people and magazines as one of the top 10 engines, just stop using it after only 3 years?
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2006 | 07:59 PM
  #33  
red_wing_2121's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-25-05
Posts: 1,244
Likes: 0
From: Sterling Heights, MI
Originally Posted by -Jayson-
can anyone name an engine that GM made that was praised by many people and magazines as one of the top 10 engines, just stop using it after only 3 years?
GM is not really changing the engine, just the forced induction system and the fuel injector locations. Other than that, it will be very much the same.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2006 | 11:10 AM
  #34  
-Jayson-'s Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-28-06
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 1
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by red_wing_2121
GM is not really changing the engine, just the forced induction system and the fuel injector locations. Other than that, it will be very much the same.
lol you cant say they arent changing the engine when all do they are doing is changed from supercharger to turbo, adding direct injection, claiming 55 more HP. Lol its not the same engine anymore.

Its not as simple as slapping on a turbo and putting the injectors elsewhere. There is literally thousands and thousands of man hours that go into designing, testing, programing, and building evey engine. Gm didnt just take the LSJ and slap a turbo on it. THey designed the engine from the ground up again, with the basis of the LSJ.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2006 | 11:15 AM
  #35  
red_wing_2121's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-25-05
Posts: 1,244
Likes: 0
From: Sterling Heights, MI
Originally Posted by -Jayson-
lol you cant say they arent changing the engine when all do they are doing is changed from supercharger to turbo, adding direct injection, claiming 55 more HP. Lol its not the same engine anymore.

Its not as simple as slapping on a turbo and putting the injectors elsewhere. There is literally thousands and thousands of man hours that go into designing, testing, programing, and building evey engine. Gm didnt just take the LSJ and slap a turbo on it. THey designed the engine from the ground up again, with the basis of the LSJ.
All of what you say is easily taken care of with PCM programming!

That is why they are still using the same engine, it is already made to accept forced induction. The only thing that needs to be done is to re-program the PCM to change air-fuel mapping.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2006 | 11:22 AM
  #36  
rickyw's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-01-06
Posts: 1,626
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh NC
we should create a thread with THINGS WE SEEN BEFORE like they do on some other forums ive been on.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2006 | 08:48 PM
  #37  
BLKblurr06's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-16-06
Posts: 1,104
Likes: 0
From: Reynoldsburg, Ohio
Just wait, Bill from HP almost promised tuning by spring for us 2.2's that means for the money of a new cobalt you can turbo your 2.2 and have a lot more horsepower for cheaper.
if 250hp is your idea of alot more. if you want more than that without worries of blowing your motor you'll have to tear into the engine.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2006 | 09:02 PM
  #38  
BLKblurr06's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-16-06
Posts: 1,104
Likes: 0
From: Reynoldsburg, Ohio
That is why they are still using the same engine, it is already made to accept forced induction. The only thing that needs to be done is to re-program the PCM to change air-fuel mapping.
No it isnt the same engine. The turbo engine has a different head that has variable valve timing and direct injection. The fuel injectors are repositioned closer to the combustion chamber and the cam profiles will be very different. Since this engine has electronic cam phasing the top end power curve will always have more potential than the LSJ even if the LSJ also had a turbo. They are both Ecotecs but since they are this differently configured they are not the same engine. Nuff said.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2006 | 09:10 PM
  #39  
BLKblurr06's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-16-06
Posts: 1,104
Likes: 0
From: Reynoldsburg, Ohio
By the way I hate threads about a production turbo CobaltSS!
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2006 | 02:40 PM
  #40  
BoltZ22's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 01-12-05
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
From: J-Town, WI
Originally Posted by red_wing_2121
And yes, the 2008 Cobalt SS will be a 2.0L direct injection turbo as can be found in the solstice gxp and sky redline.
i highly doubt it. GM would basically be shooting itself in the foot one way or another. if it will be the same basic setup as the solstice gxp, they will either need to jack the price up on the balt turbo or detune it some so it doesn't match the solstice.

or they could twin charge the solstice!
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2006 | 07:46 PM
  #41  
rally's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 05-23-06
Posts: 11,766
Likes: 0
From: Peoria, Illinois
So they're suppsedly changing tranny thus axle shafts correct?

According to Document ID#1864872 this would prove that to be wrong. GM is offering stiffer Axles and hardware for the current tranny to combat wheel hope.


NO TURBO COBALT
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2006 | 12:09 AM
  #42  
PolishPauL's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-23-06
Posts: 1,026
Likes: 0
From: Passaic, NJ
http://www.******************/forums...t-sky-red.html
The second post on the last page explains how the new turbo engine is gonna be harder to tune, but the engine is underrated in torque

Does anyone know whats up wit the stars? Its supposed to be redline.com
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2006 | 09:17 AM
  #43  
CobaltSS313's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-03-05
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
So whats up with this is there going to be a turbo cobalt or no??
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2006 | 09:22 AM
  #44  
an0malous's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-28-06
Posts: 12,577
Likes: 2
From: Canada
*slaps everyone in this thread*


now get back to bed.



*rolls up the 1349th turbo cobalt thread and burns it*
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2006 | 10:55 AM
  #45  
PAPERSUN's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 11-02-06
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: ohio
turbo?

Originally Posted by Strider_2001
Has anyone heard any new news on the rumor about the 2008 cobalts having a turbo or not.
The reason that I am wondering is because I love my 06 LS balt however I have quite a bit of cash saved up and in March I will be running into some more from my profit sharing bonus at work. I problem I am stuck is this. Should I get rid of my LS balt and buy a 07 SS/SC in March or not. I would rather have the 08 Turbo if that is really going to happen, however I don’t want to wait another year and find out that they are not going turbo.
A turbo in 08 is coming..i'm a supplier quality rep at the general motors lordstown car plant where the cobalts are built and a engineer friend of mind told me the turbo is coming..its going to be the same motor thats in the pontiac soltice gxp..260 horse..it'll have new lights, spolier, and i seen the new racing seats going in the turbo cobalt..june of 07' they should start buliding them
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2006 | 10:57 AM
  #46  
an0malous's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-28-06
Posts: 12,577
Likes: 2
From: Canada
sweet. now we have "claimed" GM employees supporting this stuff on their first post on CSS.net
Forgive me if your credibility is a little flimsy right now.



ARG can we just ******* let all this heresay go.

christ if your so desparate for that blowoff valve "pshhhhh" why did you buy a supercharged cobalt.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2006 | 11:01 AM
  #47  
D4u2s0t's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 12-18-05
Posts: 17,838
Likes: 1
From: North Jersey
Originally Posted by PAPERSUN
A turbo in 08 is coming..i'm a supplier quality rep at the general motors lordstown car plant where the cobalts are built and a engineer friend of mind told me the turbo is coming..its going to be the same motor thats in the pontiac soltice gxp..260 horse..it'll have new lights, spolier, and i seen the new racing seats going in the turbo cobalt..june of 07' they should start buliding them
haha, so it's gonna be rwd?? I smell a fake here.... nice try buddy
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2006 | 11:14 AM
  #48  
budz1065's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-15-06
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
From: Jim Thorpe, PA
Originally Posted by PAPERSUN
A turbo in 08 is coming..i'm a supplier quality rep at the general motors lordstown car plant where the cobalts are built and a engineer friend of mind told me the turbo is coming..its going to be the same motor thats in the pontiac soltice gxp..260 horse..it'll have new lights, spolier, and i seen the new racing seats going in the turbo cobalt..june of 07' they should start buliding them
and you are who???????????

Reply
Old Nov 5, 2006 | 11:22 AM
  #49  
Rodimus_Prime's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 04-02-06
Posts: 4,513
Likes: 0
From: Harrisburg, PA
I was going to wait for the 08 turbo but I dont think my car will last that long, and i kinda like superchargers over turbos even though in terms of technology the LSJ will be way behind the new turbo motor

As far as seats I dont think it can get any better than recaros they fit my ass perfectly
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2006 | 01:11 PM
  #50  
FLCobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-24-05
Posts: 1,395
Likes: 1
From: florida
I prefer a Supercharger over a turbo, instant boost is the way to go =) Then again im not trying to get my car to like 350 hp. more like 270, so the super charger on this car is more then enough for me.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:30 PM.