Saturn Ion Made the list. Top 10
Saturn Ion Made the list. Top 10
5. 2003 Saturn Ion
( GM )
Shockingly incompetent to drive and with a stupid interior to match. Kick it and your foot could get stuck in the gaps between the plastic body panels. Easily the second worst car of the 21st century.
Story: Edmunds rates the bad cars
( GM )
Shockingly incompetent to drive and with a stupid interior to match. Kick it and your foot could get stuck in the gaps between the plastic body panels. Easily the second worst car of the 21st century.
Story: Edmunds rates the bad cars
Kick it and your foot could get stuck in the gaps between the plastic body panels.
Not even close. Sounds like someone has no clue on the thermal expansion and contraction of polymer. Of course you can't have Mecerdes tolerances with it.
honestly, most of those cars on there aren't that bad.
the pinto had a cost cutting issue with the fuel tank, so i will give them that one.
the series D was an attempt to compete with higher dollar brands, didn't pan out, but there have been others.
the olds diesels are horrid to drive, but i never got the impression that they were bad cars, just slow and noisy.
cimarrons arent that bad at all, at least not for the time, it's just not a cadillac
the edsel wasn't popular, but it wasn't a bad car.
i don't care for the looks, but i don't think there is anything "bad" about the ion.
vegas were cheap crap.
i have always failed to see what was so bad about the yugo
mustang II is again, ugly and crap to drive, but i never got the impression they were bad cars.
the aztek's crime is that it's ugly. still see a lot with a lot of miles on it.
seems to me this is more a list of "ugly or unfun cars"
but, lest we forget, asian / european car makers can do no wrong.
because, the le'car is a WAY better car than an ion.
the pinto had a cost cutting issue with the fuel tank, so i will give them that one.
the series D was an attempt to compete with higher dollar brands, didn't pan out, but there have been others.
the olds diesels are horrid to drive, but i never got the impression that they were bad cars, just slow and noisy.
cimarrons arent that bad at all, at least not for the time, it's just not a cadillac
the edsel wasn't popular, but it wasn't a bad car.
i don't care for the looks, but i don't think there is anything "bad" about the ion.
vegas were cheap crap.
i have always failed to see what was so bad about the yugo
mustang II is again, ugly and crap to drive, but i never got the impression they were bad cars.
the aztek's crime is that it's ugly. still see a lot with a lot of miles on it.
seems to me this is more a list of "ugly or unfun cars"
but, lest we forget, asian / european car makers can do no wrong.
because, the le'car is a WAY better car than an ion.
that was a terrible list, yeah the aztek is ugly, but most people who have them just LOVE them
whats wrong with Ions? I drove one before, it was a good little car.
but yeah I agree with most of the other cars, Vega, Cimmaron, yugo.. all **** boxes.. and aren't pintos the ones that exploded?
whats wrong with Ions? I drove one before, it was a good little car.
but yeah I agree with most of the other cars, Vega, Cimmaron, yugo.. all **** boxes.. and aren't pintos the ones that exploded?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Iceberg
New Members Check In!!
8
Sep 29, 2015 12:33 PM
Jesse
Problems/Service/Maintenance
2
Sep 28, 2015 12:51 PM



