Pictures & Videos Your pictures, photoshops, and videos.

Official 2009 Photography Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 27, 2009 | 12:57 AM
  #401  
titaniumss's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-15-04
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
From: Blue Springs, MO
Originally Posted by myfakeevo
so basically i need to work on my photoshop skills?

I mean the only way i can get better is being taught.

I went to school for communications, so I can make some pretty wild videos haha.
Good images first, then decent photoshop skills

Originally Posted by 06_SS_S/C
titanium, the edit looks pretty good other than being oversharped. levels and contrast look great.
Honestly, I didn't even touch the sharpness much. Most that you see is the adjustments I did in shadow/highlight to bring out more detail and light in the car. From possibly turning the sharpness up to +30, I took it to +2.
Old Jan 29, 2009 | 12:58 PM
  #402  
sick06cobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-06-07
Posts: 9,714
Likes: 0
From: somewhere
finally something worthy of posting...
excuse the watermark.. its not normally that big on the other photos. just on the panos.

1.


2.


3.


not to mention this one:

Last edited by sick06cobalt; Feb 3, 2009 at 03:17 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old Jan 29, 2009 | 01:00 PM
  #403  
06_SS_S/C's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 02-26-07
Posts: 4,645
Likes: 0
From: Tacoma, WA
the watermark just kills me lol.

the best part of #3 is covered up by it
Old Jan 29, 2009 | 01:04 PM
  #404  
sick06cobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-06-07
Posts: 9,714
Likes: 0
From: somewhere
it wouldnt be there if you printed it... (hint hint)....
Old Jan 29, 2009 | 07:21 PM
  #405  
06_SS_S/C's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 02-26-07
Posts: 4,645
Likes: 0
From: Tacoma, WA
how would i know if i want to print it if i cant see it? just post low res copies, i dont think you will have much to worry about.
Old Jan 30, 2009 | 03:28 PM
  #406  
Spectral's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-30-06
Posts: 11,850
Likes: 0
From: Federal Way, Washington
a watermark shouldn't be red like that...it distracts from the actual image.
i don't look at the whole of any of those images my eye is drawn straight to the red becuase it obviously not suppose to be there and stands out like a sore thumb.
Old Jan 30, 2009 | 10:49 PM
  #407  
cereal83's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-20-08
Posts: 742
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, Canada
My latest

Old Jan 30, 2009 | 11:48 PM
  #408  
basketball0028's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 12-23-06
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
From: Seattle
Just got the camera and took some random pics...





Old Jan 30, 2009 | 11:59 PM
  #409  
artawesome's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-22-05
Posts: 2,819
Likes: 0
From: newport news.VA
cereal83, i need to try this. i hate to copy what has already been done though. after a few shots, i might try some different views.
Old Jan 31, 2009 | 09:21 AM
  #410  
cereal83's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-20-08
Posts: 742
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by artawesome
cereal83, i need to try this. i hate to copy what has already been done though. after a few shots, i might try some different views.
Hey, try it man. I copied the image from somebody else so its ok. I am just trying to see what I can learn. Different views might be possible but to get the heart shape shadow, the light has to be infront of you coming down on the ring.
Old Jan 31, 2009 | 02:23 PM
  #411  
sick06cobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-06-07
Posts: 9,714
Likes: 0
From: somewhere
Originally Posted by Spectral
a watermark shouldn't be red like that...it distracts from the actual image.
i don't look at the whole of any of those images my eye is drawn straight to the red becuase it obviously not suppose to be there and stands out like a sore thumb.
very far from the truth... in these images it stands out because of the white.. but I cant change it just because of an image.. so well see..
Old Feb 2, 2009 | 09:44 PM
  #412  
smartdude24's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-09-07
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 0
From: :)
So I bought a Rebel XS this morning... beautiful camera... takes absolutely amazing pictures, but my GF loves doing macro stuff and I really can't afford a macro lens, nor do we want to haul around multiple lenses and it's not exactly the best camera to take on a trip and not have it be annoying to carry around.

So we returned it and picked up the SX10 IS, which is still fairly large, but the lens does a much larger range, so no need for additional lenses. I'm a little disappointed now because there is a noticeable difference in the quality of the pictures. Am I crazy, or should this be expected between those two cameras? I'm just wondering if I should get the XS and just a cheap, slim point and shoot for her to play with and for us to take on trips and such.

I guess my biggest concern is that it's only $200 cheaper, still has the bulk of the XS, but without as much functionality and from my amateur opinion, not as good quality. Are my concerns valid, or will I be happy with the SX10 IS once I get better at photography?

Opinions and advice are very welcomed.
Old Feb 2, 2009 | 10:37 PM
  #413  
Spectral's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-30-06
Posts: 11,850
Likes: 0
From: Federal Way, Washington
Originally Posted by smartdude24
So I bought a Rebel XS this morning... beautiful camera... takes absolutely amazing pictures, but my GF loves doing macro stuff and I really can't afford a macro lens, nor do we want to haul around multiple lenses and it's not exactly the best camera to take on a trip and not have it be annoying to carry around.

So we returned it and picked up the SX10 IS, which is still fairly large, but the lens does a much larger range, so no need for additional lenses. I'm a little disappointed now because there is a noticeable difference in the quality of the pictures. Am I crazy, or should this be expected between those two cameras? I'm just wondering if I should get the XS and just a cheap, slim point and shoot for her to play with and for us to take on trips and such.

I guess my biggest concern is that it's only $200 cheaper, still has the bulk of the XS, but without as much functionality and from my amateur opinion, not as good quality. Are my concerns valid, or will I be happy with the SX10 IS once I get better at photography?

Opinions and advice are very welcomed.
if she ONLY wants macro. Take the camera back get the XS and pick up a small point and shoot. I would recommend getting the Sony W-120. It's a solid little camera and enough for all she will probably need.

The XS is much more versatile for the majority of the pictures you want to take. Plus you do have the ability to switch lens and use different ones if you want. Which you may find out if you really get into this that you want different lenses.....With the XS you have room to grow, the SX110IS leaves you kinda stuck right there and no room to grow.
Old Feb 2, 2009 | 10:38 PM
  #414  
cereal83's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-20-08
Posts: 742
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by smartdude24
So I bought a Rebel XS this morning... beautiful camera... takes absolutely amazing pictures, but my GF loves doing macro stuff and I really can't afford a macro lens, nor do we want to haul around multiple lenses and it's not exactly the best camera to take on a trip and not have it be annoying to carry around.

So we returned it and picked up the SX10 IS, which is still fairly large, but the lens does a much larger range, so no need for additional lenses. I'm a little disappointed now because there is a noticeable difference in the quality of the pictures. Am I crazy, or should this be expected between those two cameras? I'm just wondering if I should get the XS and just a cheap, slim point and shoot for her to play with and for us to take on trips and such.

I guess my biggest concern is that it's only $200 cheaper, still has the bulk of the XS, but without as much functionality and from my amateur opinion, not as good quality. Are my concerns valid, or will I be happy with the SX10 IS once I get better at photography?

Opinions and advice are very welcomed.
Your crazy to return a DSLR for a point and shoot camera. Yeah maybe it has more zoom but with the SLR, you can get other lens and if you don't want to carry other lens then I guess a P&S works for you. But imo, your doing it ass backwards.
Old Feb 2, 2009 | 10:38 PM
  #415  
titaniumss's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-15-04
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
From: Blue Springs, MO
First of all, the sensors are COMPLETELY different. Point and shoot = CCD sensor (P&S formatted), DSLR (XS) = CMOS sensor (SLR formatted). The different in image quality is very noticeable, so you are correct. Just get here a $150-200 point and shoot (nikon or canon are good), and go back and get your XS. It's a great starter camera!
Old Feb 2, 2009 | 10:49 PM
  #416  
smartdude24's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-09-07
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 0
From: :)
Yeah... good point everyone. I'm going to take care of that tomorrow. will kind of feel like an ass doing another exchange just to go back to what I had.... oh well!
Old Feb 2, 2009 | 10:59 PM
  #417  
titaniumss's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-15-04
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
From: Blue Springs, MO
They'll thank you. We love doing DSLR sales more than P&S lol
Old Feb 2, 2009 | 11:02 PM
  #418  
Spectral's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-30-06
Posts: 11,850
Likes: 0
From: Federal Way, Washington
Originally Posted by smartdude24
Yeah... good point everyone. I'm going to take care of that tomorrow. will kind of feel like an ass doing another exchange just to go back to what I had.... oh well!
You will not regret it!!
Old Feb 3, 2009 | 12:00 AM
  #419  
titaniumss's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-15-04
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
From: Blue Springs, MO
Speaking of better gear. Anyone know of a 5D owner wanting to sell or trade for a 50D plus some cash on my end?
Old Feb 3, 2009 | 12:45 AM
  #420  
OniMirage's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-14-05
Posts: 6,697
Likes: 0
From: Phx, AZ
Originally Posted by basketball0028
Just got the camera and took some random pics...
image one needs some adjustment ... possibly coulda been better with a cpl to regain the sky a quick adjustment in photoshop reveals much more color detail is possible while maintaining some of the foggy look and the white balance appears to be wrong 2 and 3 are nice
Old Feb 3, 2009 | 01:11 AM
  #421  
Spectral's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-30-06
Posts: 11,850
Likes: 0
From: Federal Way, Washington
Originally Posted by titaniumss
Speaking of better gear. Anyone know of a 5D owner wanting to sell or trade for a 50D plus some cash on my end?
you change cameras to often! didnt you JUST get the 50D? hahaha.
Old Feb 3, 2009 | 02:05 AM
  #422  
titaniumss's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-15-04
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
From: Blue Springs, MO
lol 50D as soon as it came out. Jumped the gun a little early. It's got 3230 shots on it. I'd just like to grab a used 5D for weddings. It'll be more useful.
Old Feb 3, 2009 | 02:09 AM
  #423  
smartdude24's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-09-07
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 0
From: :)
whoa... also just realized that with sales on right now, the XS is only $100 cnd more than the SX10... even more reason to go with that one
Old Feb 3, 2009 | 05:09 AM
  #424  
Iturbo's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 12-28-08
Posts: 1,783
Likes: 0
From: Upstate New York
Yeah, so I just picked up a Canon Rebel XT 8.0 mp. First DSLR camera and I actually like it. Bought it for 350.00

So im looking forward to reading tips

Thanks!
Old Feb 3, 2009 | 12:53 PM
  #425  
artawesome's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-22-05
Posts: 2,819
Likes: 0
From: newport news.VA
Originally Posted by Iturbo
Yeah, so I just picked up a Canon Rebel XT 8.0 mp. First DSLR camera and I actually like it. Bought it for 350.00

So im looking forward to reading tips

Thanks!
wow! how did you pull that off..or where did you buy it from?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:55 AM.