I heard that Saturn trap hight up in Canada.

You might want to race SK360 up there.

 

proof you do come on to guys LOLOLOL

 

km/h

 

LOL

118 Km/h

Nice

 

so, let me get this right. street dddrreeeaaammmmzzzzzzzzz is calling out cars thats are clearly going to push his **** in with his "fast" sky at a whopping 103 trap speed, which btw is weak. now you can't even back this supposed badass irl that you took apart for no reason? admit defeat sunshine.

just sayin.

 

I agree ^^^^^^^^^^^^^

 

Yup. Still waiting to hear your mods. Can't be that fast if you had to buy an automatic.

And to go back a few pages, here's your proof that the car still exists since you were skeptical:







I took the IRL apart to make a massive turbo build, if you remember this thread:

https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/advanced-performance-modifications-130/turbo-progress-finally-underway-gutted-engine-bay-pics-inside-125990/

But after putting all the math together and realing a 500hp FWD car is like being the smrtest retard, I went and bought a Sky Redline to beef up instead. Now the IRL was going back to complete stock for summer time DD duty, but threads like these are going to make me throw the mods (lowering springs included lol) back on to hush all the nay-sayers.

And I'm not sure where you got a 103mph trap speed as weak. That's good for high 12s with a 1.8 60' time on a warmer day. For example: Good old 06lackg86ss up there does a paltry 12.84 @ 114 in the 1/4. I could do that same 12.84 @ 103. So we tie each other at the end of the track. Doesn't look like his car is any quicker than mine at that point.

 

Didnt area try to tell you , your going to hit a brick wall with your turbo plans at about 450whp and you told him STFU you own a well known shop and you are going to build a 600 whp saturn with no engine work. and whats up with them old ass pics , if you own the car just go outside with a piece of paper with todays date and snap a pic.

 

like i said........................that's weird. i coulda swore i heard of some ion redline pwning a 460whp ls6 zo6 with about 400whp. hmmm. anyone heard this one?

 

my A4 would rout you, from a dig, from a roll, I would never even take you serious.
I am sure you really know how weak your car is, I'll give you credit and say you can't truely be that dumb, but you have this forum to hide behind with bogus claims.

 

HAHA I have an auto and I'll race ya. Tell you what I'll even give you a couple of cars from a roll or a dig.

How the hell do you figure a 103 will get you in the 12s with a 1.8 60'? Back when I first put the blower on I went 12.87 @ 109 with a 2.0 60'. I hate to break it to you its going to take more than a 1.8 to run 12s with a 103 trap.

Also do you have any timeslips or track videos of the car? All I have seen is one lame ass video of you "racing" a 4XXhp Z06.

PS: A 103 trap is weak as ****.

 

You know your a serious bullshitter when gtos , cobalts and redline owners unite to call you out and call you out.

 

gto, cobalt, redline, mustang, and vette owners.

 

Wow this guy is full of ****.

LOL @ 103 Traps. HAHAHA

 

lmao at the 103 traps considering stock SS/SC trap 100mph

 

haha, 12 seconds with 103 traps, **** i need to get my 60 ft time down then, i trap 103. im only stage 2. haha

 

Old ass pics? I just took them 2 hours ago. WTF.

 

dont west virginia cars have front plates? just asking.

 

All of you need to go back and learn how to get going from a dig then and the fundamentals of drag racing. If you know ANYTHING about drag racing then you know that 1/10th in your 60' is usually worth about 1.5-2/10ths in the 1/4 mile. And yellowGT you have just proven the point yourself. You had a horrible 60' time of 2.0 and did a 12.87 @ 109. Get your 60' down to like a 1.8 and watch your car do a 12.5 @ 109 instead. High trap speeds mean you suck at launching. I have ran 14.2s before at 108mph. But that's with a 2.4 60' time. Maybe this will help you see better: A bolt on AWD EVO with a good clutch and sticky tires can do a 12.2 @ 110 in the 1/4 with a 1.5 60', when the best you can manage out of your Mustang is a 12.87 @ 109. It's only a 1mph difference, but it's nearly 7/10ths. Because the EVO has a great launch. Your s/c'ed Mustang and that bolt on EVO probably make about the same power. The difference is the EVO got going better, plain and simple.

Also, straight off the Solstice GXP forum: ^^^Compare that to your Mustang. He is making significantly less power than you, yet running a much faster time at the same speed. How? A good launch, that's all. Someone was talking about something in the neighborhood of a 1.65 60' time.

No. Thank god. I hated that about living in NY.

What's your 60' time? If you're pulling a 2.2 60' and only trapping 103 then there is no hope for even coming close to 12s for you. I bet you knock out the 1/4 in what 13.9, 14.0?

 

Mods are not important... you were so confident pages ago that you were gonna wax me... so Ill let you find out.

There we go, start picking at my choice in transmission....

 

This has to be the dumbest ******* post I have ever read by someone claiming to be a car guru.


What in the **** does that mean exactly? So because someone bought an Automatic means the car can't be that fast? WTF does that mean? Automatic cars are not fast?? Are you that ******* stupid?

Have you ever thought he bought a stock car with an Auto and put mods into it and made it faster yet kept an auto? Is it that hard to understand?

Dumbest post I have ever read in my 3 years of being associated with this site goes to StreetDreamz.

Thanks for the sig material.

 

Dude you are a complete tool.

A 103 car will NOT net an ET in the 12s. You can improve 60' times but not that much.

A 2.0 60' is not horrible its not great but its not that bad especially on a auto car.

A 1.5 60' in a Lancer aint that easy to get it takes more than bolt ons and they still trap higher than 110.

Also those were old times and I run 10.85@128.19 with a 1.69 60'.



Please don't try to school me on racing when you have no ******* clue what you are talking about. A 103 trap speed is NOT a 12 sec car plain and simple.

 

Enough....

 

Dude now my computer has a virus because you are posting unsecure ****. Cut that crap out. I hope you get banned.

 

And now this thread, after getting back on track and learning to express opinions calmly has gone to hell again. So.