War Stories Post your racing wins. CobaltSS.net does not support or encourage street racing. Be smart and take it to the track.

Cobalt Ls vs Mitsubishi Lancer

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 20, 2009 | 12:10 PM
  #1  
comatt's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 03-18-09
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Cobalt Ls vs Mitsubishi Lancer

Which would win in a 40 roll...my friend has an ls but is afraid of losing to the lancer...the lancer has nothing done to it and neither does the ls...just seeing your opinion
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2009 | 02:59 PM
  #2  
REIGN SS's Avatar
Original Hayden Fanatic
Platinum Member
 
Joined: 05-06-06
Posts: 33,169
Likes: 1
From: Dayton, O HI O
*Moved to War Stories, please post in the correct section*
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2009 | 03:01 PM
  #3  
D4u2s0t's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 12-18-05
Posts: 17,838
Likes: 1
From: North Jersey
It's only a war story if it already happened... General cobalt would be the forum for this.
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2009 | 03:07 PM
  #4  
boltedbalt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-17-08
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
mmm ima say that the coblat should win this...the lancers are nothing really stock....but nerhtier is the balt hahha i say cobalt!
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2009 | 03:08 PM
  #5  
blackbolt89's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-28-08
Posts: 5,068
Likes: 0
From: New Milford, NJ
hmmm i dont know, i would love to find out though. since i never raced a lancer before.
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2009 | 03:10 PM
  #6  
SedanMan08's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-10-08
Posts: 995
Likes: 0
From: Springfield, Missouri
Interesting.
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2009 | 03:12 PM
  #7  
jschatte's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-30-07
Posts: 2,226
Likes: 0
From: Moose Jaw / Regina, Sask
My friend has a 2.4 lancer and I cant keep up...
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2009 | 03:14 PM
  #8  
boltedbalt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-17-08
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
i thought that some of the lancers have a different engine than the 2.4.....im pretty sure i saw under the hood of one that had a 2.2? correct if im worng!
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2009 | 03:23 PM
  #9  
PNYKLR-TA's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 03-31-09
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
From: Phx, AZ
last time out at the track my buddy in his cat-back only 99 Tahoe beat one. the Tahoe ran a 16.8 and the Lancer hit a 17.2 or so. This was in phoenix when the DA was near 2000 thou.
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2009 | 04:06 PM
  #10  
boltedbalt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-17-08
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
mmm by thoes numbers i think teh cobalt should win.....
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2009 | 04:09 PM
  #11  
PNYKLR-TA's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 03-31-09
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
From: Phx, AZ
Originally Posted by boltedbalt
mmm by thoes numbers i think teh cobalt should win.....
im not sure what the stock LS's run, but i would think they would be pretty even if both cars were Stick, or vice versa.

And i think that lancer was auto at the track with the paddle shifters.
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2009 | 04:19 PM
  #12  
boltedbalt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-17-08
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
mmm i dunno i drive and LS tho almost fully bolted....just gotta tune and get the damn 2.4 mani im feel pretty confident in taking a lancer hahah....
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2009 | 04:24 PM
  #13  
Auddasea's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 07-09-08
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
From: Tucson
lancers are garbage stock.... you should be able to pull in front of it, not by a lot but at least half a car in length... or at least mine did, mine is the lt though....all stock

at a 40 roll you should be able to take it home.... I know my car has poor accel from start but a 40 or higher roll it flys by... kind of lol
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2009 | 11:54 PM
  #14  
blackbolt89's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-28-08
Posts: 5,068
Likes: 0
From: New Milford, NJ
im gonna try this next time i see one. just gotta make sure its not ralliart. with 17.5psi they would wipe the floor with us.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2009 | 09:53 AM
  #15  
D4u2s0t's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 12-18-05
Posts: 17,838
Likes: 1
From: North Jersey
You guys are funny. Don't know what year lancer, what engine, or anything, but you just assume he'll win
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2009 | 10:55 AM
  #16  
boltedbalt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-17-08
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
mmm ^ thats what i was getting at earlier in the post hahaha
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2009 | 11:16 AM
  #17  
D4u2s0t's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 12-18-05
Posts: 17,838
Likes: 1
From: North Jersey
Originally Posted by Auddasea
lancers are garbage stock.... you should be able to pull in front of it, not by a lot but at least half a car in length... or at least mine did, mine is the lt though....all stock

at a 40 roll you should be able to take it home.... I know my car has poor accel from start but a 40 or higher roll it flys by... kind of lol
Originally Posted by boltedbalt
i thought that some of the lancers have a different engine than the 2.4.....im pretty sure i saw under the hood of one that had a 2.2? correct if im worng!
the lancer with the 4b11 engine will pretty much destroy any 2.2 on this site. Wouldn't even be close. Anything other than the lowest engine will walk a 2.2. The new lancers have 3 engine's available.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2009 | 12:19 PM
  #18  
PNYKLR-TA's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 03-31-09
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
From: Phx, AZ
Originally Posted by D4u2s0t
the lancer with the 4b11 engine will pretty much destroy any 2.2 on this site. Wouldn't even be close. Anything other than the lowest engine will walk a 2.2. The new lancers have 3 engine's available.
im not really familiar with mutsi or anything, but i was hearing from an evo guy at my work that the new Rallyart's are turbo'd and are made to match / compete with the WRX, where as the evo's up against the STI.

that true?
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2009 | 12:35 PM
  #19  
blackbolt89's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-28-08
Posts: 5,068
Likes: 0
From: New Milford, NJ
Originally Posted by PNYKLR-TA
im not really familiar with mutsi or anything, but i was hearing from an evo guy at my work that the new Rallyart's are turbo'd and are made to match / compete with the WRX, where as the evo's up against the STI.

that true?
yes'm

the ralliart is a 2.0 4B11T making 237 horse and 253 torque

whereas the WRX is a 2.5 Turbo making 265 horse and 244 torque.

those cars are nothing to be laughing at. both are very fast vehicles.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2009 | 12:48 PM
  #20  
D4u2s0t's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 12-18-05
Posts: 17,838
Likes: 1
From: North Jersey
Originally Posted by PNYKLR-TA
im not really familiar with mutsi or anything, but i was hearing from an evo guy at my work that the new Rallyart's are turbo'd and are made to match / compete with the WRX, where as the evo's up against the STI.

that true?
The new raliart has a de-tuned evo engine.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2009 | 12:59 PM
  #21  
Auddasea's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 07-09-08
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
From: Tucson
The one I tackled was a base model 04.... garbage lol!!
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2009 | 01:31 PM
  #22  
PNYKLR-TA's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 03-31-09
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
From: Phx, AZ
Originally Posted by blackbolt89
yes'm

the ralliart is a 2.0 4B11T making 237 horse and 253 torque

whereas the WRX is a 2.5 Turbo making 265 horse and 244 torque.

those cars are nothing to be laughing at. both are very fast vehicles.
Originally Posted by D4u2s0t
The new raliart has a de-tuned evo engine.
good call guys, i was almost positive it was just couldnt remember for 100% sure.

but how in the world does the smaller engine make more torque? and the WRX has a boxer motor IIRC. . . odd. . .
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2009 | 04:18 PM
  #23  
blackbolt89's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-28-08
Posts: 5,068
Likes: 0
From: New Milford, NJ
mitsu engineering FTW
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Cptnslo
Complete Cars
9
Sep 24, 2015 09:32 AM
Rayray2781@gmail.com
New Members Check In!!
27
Sep 20, 2015 01:52 PM
Bluelightning
War Stories
29
Sep 8, 2015 05:18 PM
jthwjde
Problems/Service/Maintenance
1
Sep 7, 2015 09:24 AM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:25 AM.