Educating the local ricers, one at a time.
I understand you arguement Self, but I still don't consider it F/I. Like mentioned by others, the engine sucks in the nitrous just like regular air.
Would it be considered F/I if you go to a lower elevation, reduce the humidity, or decrease the intake temp? That is what you are implying with your nitrous arguement.
Would it be considered F/I if you go to a lower elevation, reduce the humidity, or decrease the intake temp? That is what you are implying with your nitrous arguement.
... Nitrous is not forced incution ... wtf? You are "spraying" Nitrogen Oxide, Hence the term "spray" into the intake... Forced Induction = Supercharger\Turbo... Its constantly forcing air into the Intake not just when u press or flip ur NOS switch...
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: 07-02-05
Posts: 8,725
Likes: 2
From: West Carrollton (Dayton), OH
From what I've always understood, F/I is something that is part of the engine. (I.E. mechanical component) and in use at all time wether or not it's under load determines how much increase it provides. N2O is a chemical (aka, NON-mechanical) and is only used at periods in short bursts. According to Self's approach: in esence, an octane booster like STP put in the fuel tank could be classified as F/I becuase it increases performance (not by much at all, but same principal) Nitrous is not a permanent part of the engine because it is not always present. Turbo/super chargers are present in the performance of the engine at all times.
F/I = mechanical component
N2O = Chemical
F/I = mechanical component
N2O = Chemical
Originally Posted by 2ManyToySS
Of course it is a neon owner that can't admit that they're wrong...
Got to love trolls! 
Got to love trolls! 
Originally Posted by Self
Ok here is the bottom line, when using any type of F/I whether it be nitrous, turbocharging or god forbid supercharging, you are essentially forcing more oxygen to burn in the combustion chamber, enabling a small displacement engine to have the same power output as a larger displacement engine. You following me monkey boy? Nutswingers unite.

But honestly.... did I really expect someone who made the "smart" decision to buy a neon to actually be smart enough to follow this simple argument? Nahhh.
Originally Posted by Self
Its idiots like this that make a good argument suck.
Originally Posted by Self
Congrats on all your slow cars.
Originally Posted by Self
Nitrous is fair game we have just as much opportunity to use it as they do. They could say the same about us needing f/i to beat them.
but back to the topic there are some monster civics so I'd watch your ass when putting all civics into one category b/c you never know which one's gonna leave you and your ride in the dust.
self what you got done to your car? You talk like you've got alot done but I'm pretty sure I would have heard your name brought up in some srt conversation if that was the case.
but back to the topic there are some monster civics so I'd watch your ass when putting all civics into one category b/c you never know which one's gonna leave you and your ride in the dust.
self what you got done to your car? You talk like you've got alot done but I'm pretty sure I would have heard your name brought up in some srt conversation if that was the case.
Originally Posted by alleycat58
Forced induction means the pressure (hence the term FORCED) of the air going into the motor through the intake manifold, not the amount of air going in.
Originally Posted by e to the x
Why in gods name are you on this forum if you don't even own a Cobalt?
I have to say the thread should have been shut down a while ago. Given the clear definition of F/I vs the chemical reaction that takes place when the nitrous does it's thing inside the combustion chamber. While it does increase pressure in the chamber, it's not the result of mechanical compression. Perhaps Self should lay off the Fast and Curious flicks and do some research.
Self was right in essence. Nitrous and charging both increase the compression ratio, thus making power. Nitrous "forces" the motor to use more fuel and increase power. They both have the same outcome so there is no reason to not consider them the same.
Originally Posted by CoBOT
Self was right in essence. Nitrous and charging both increase the compression ratio, thus making power. Nitrous "forces" the motor to use more fuel and increase power. They both have the same outcome so there is no reason to not consider them the same.
[/broken record]
Originally Posted by alleycat58
[/broken record]
More octane does not EVER mean more power.
Is that so? Then why does my buddy's S4 get more HP on 100 octane race fuel than on pump fuel? Why doesn't nascar and top fuel dragsters run 87 octane? I mean, I'm not a hot air balloon operator or anything so if you could educate me on this subject.
Originally Posted by StinkBOMB
Is that so? Then why does my buddy's S4 get more HP on 100 octane race fuel than on pump fuel? Why doesn't nascar and top fuel dragsters run 87 octane? I mean, I'm not a hot air balloon operator or anything so if you could educate me on this subject.
For octane... http://auto.howstuffworks.com/question90.htm
Originally Posted by alleycat58
So is considering "NAWZ" to be forced induction...that was the point I was trying to make, obviously it worked.
Originally Posted by CoBOT
You will never see me say "NAWZ" or NOS when referring to nitrous. So explain to me how nitrous isn't a form of forced induction. I will wholly agree it doesn't fit the definition of forced induction, but it does the EXACT same thing to make power.
F/I = more oxygen by increased amount of normal air (pressure).
Nitrous = more oxygen by increased O2 content through a chemical reaction.

next were going to get all the little hondas comming over here saying "OOOH johnny NAWS is the **** its F/I let me doo you in the butt with it. OOOOOOhhhhh johnny NAWS is like crack once you get it you dont want off of it."

Nitrous is a chemical end of story it does not require power to make power other then the electrical kind. Heres a test if you could take a motor just the motor and start it up (no electricity running through the motor just the belts and exhaust running it) the supercharger would still work and so would the turbo. BUT THE NITROUS wouldnt because guess what ITS NOT PART OF THE ENGINE. SOOOOOOOO we can logically assume since its not part of the engine its probably not going to be considered part of F/I. And because of this I am reminded of a story about logic
Two rednecks, Bubba and Cooter, decided that they weren't going anywhere in life and thought they should go to college to get ahead.
Bubba goes in first, and the professor advises him to take math, history and logic.
"What's logic?" asked Bubba.
The professor answered, "Let me give you an example. Do you own a weed-whacker?"
"I sure do," answered the redneck.
"Then I can assume, using logic, that you have a yard," replied the professor.
"That's real good," the redneck responded in awe.
The professor continued, "Logic will also tell me that since you have a yard, you also have a house."
Impressed, the redneck shouted, "AMAZIN'!"
"And since you own a house, logic dictates that you have a wife."
"Betty Mae! This is incredible!"
"Finally, since you have a wife, logically I can assume that you are heterosexual," said the professor.
"You're absolutely right! Why, that's the most fascinatin' thing I ever heard of! I cain't wait to take this here logic class."
Bubba, proud of the new world opening up to him, walked back into the hallway where Cooter is still waiting.
"So, what classes are ya takin?" he asks.
"Math, history and logic," replies Bubba.
Cooter says, "What in tarnation is logic?"
"Let me give you an example. Do ya own a weed-eater?"
"No."
"You're a queer, ain't ya?"
Originally Posted by CoBOT
That is pure rice.
More octane does not EVER mean more power.


:rol leyes:
More octane does not EVER mean more power.


