G35 sedan stock VS Camaro SS L99 Auto on the track rnd 2
05-14-2013, 02:57 PM
#51
05-14-2013, 03:03 PM
#53
Senior Member
Join Date: 04-20-11
Location: BFN
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
First off, is your car a Nismo Z? No? Oh so you are comparing your car to a lighter car with a manual tranny. Didn't you just try and tell me that was apples to oranges?
Second can you not read? That was ran in Florida, at a track that is almost sea level. In November when the temperatures are cooler. That means the DA is LOW. What are you not understanding about that? Its a simple concept. Low DA's mean denser air. Denser air means more oxygen in the combustion chamber. That equals more power and that equals faster ET's.
The next fastest HR Z ran a 13.2 @ 108. It was ran in December at 46F in Maryland at a track about 200ft above sea level. You see a trend here? You are trying to base your times off of lighter faster cars that are running in way better conditions.
Why don't you stick with the 3 I posted, they are the same car as yours. Only one is faster and the DA that day was so ridiculously low he will likely never repeat those results.
Second can you not read? That was ran in Florida, at a track that is almost sea level. In November when the temperatures are cooler. That means the DA is LOW. What are you not understanding about that? Its a simple concept. Low DA's mean denser air. Denser air means more oxygen in the combustion chamber. That equals more power and that equals faster ET's.
The next fastest HR Z ran a 13.2 @ 108. It was ran in December at 46F in Maryland at a track about 200ft above sea level. You see a trend here? You are trying to base your times off of lighter faster cars that are running in way better conditions.
Why don't you stick with the 3 I posted, they are the same car as yours. Only one is faster and the DA that day was so ridiculously low he will likely never repeat those results.
Stock 2013 Infiniti G37 1/4 mile Drag Racing timeslip specs 0-60 - DragTimes.com
^That should be proof that to you that nothing is set in stone, if not.... well no one can help you. Lol.
05-14-2013, 03:41 PM
#54
Senior Member
Again comparing cars that you don't have. Others with the same car as you have barely BARELY bested your time in better conditions, with better driving and mods to boot. The only explanation is your car is magic since you say it's stock.
05-14-2013, 03:52 PM
#55
Member
Join Date: 10-27-10
Location: FL
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Honestly, he does this in every thread he starts and in several other threads. We need to give into the greatness....
Last edited by VR09Sedan; 05-14-2013 at 04:00 PM.
05-15-2013, 01:57 AM
#56
Good runs.
I don't understand why the guy with the 350z hates so much on the guy with the G35 doing well. It's not like the G35 is faster. According to the sig, the 350Z guy is faster stock. The G35 guy isn't bashing 350Zs and they're similar platforms. Both have good times IMO. They should be congratulating each other.
As for CMiller's times... they're legit. It's an auto. All he's doing is flooring it. He actually lost the Camaro races. He was just first across the finish line. He just got the car. He's a poor student and can't afford to mod it (sorry lol). The car did belong to his dad who wouldn't have modded it.
If the times the car is running are really that outlandish, the only possible explaination is that someone modded it before his dad bought it. If that's the case, it's only a tune because there aren't any bolt ons. If there's a way to check for a tune I'll check it myself.......
I don't know anything about those kinds of cars. I personally love the G35, G37, 350Z and 370Z. I'd take any of them. I raced a 350Z one time in my SS/TC with DP and tune. I got beat but not by much. It had Volk wheels and a Greddy turbo kit running 8 psi. It was a badass car.
I don't understand why the guy with the 350z hates so much on the guy with the G35 doing well. It's not like the G35 is faster. According to the sig, the 350Z guy is faster stock. The G35 guy isn't bashing 350Zs and they're similar platforms. Both have good times IMO. They should be congratulating each other.
As for CMiller's times... they're legit. It's an auto. All he's doing is flooring it. He actually lost the Camaro races. He was just first across the finish line. He just got the car. He's a poor student and can't afford to mod it (sorry lol). The car did belong to his dad who wouldn't have modded it.
If the times the car is running are really that outlandish, the only possible explaination is that someone modded it before his dad bought it. If that's the case, it's only a tune because there aren't any bolt ons. If there's a way to check for a tune I'll check it myself.......
I don't know anything about those kinds of cars. I personally love the G35, G37, 350Z and 370Z. I'd take any of them. I raced a 350Z one time in my SS/TC with DP and tune. I got beat but not by much. It had Volk wheels and a Greddy turbo kit running 8 psi. It was a badass car.
Last edited by casionerd; 05-15-2013 at 02:03 AM.
05-15-2013, 02:18 AM
#57
Good runs.
I don't understand why the guy with the 350z hates so much on the guy with the G35 doing well. It's not like the G35 is faster. According to the sig, the 350Z guy is faster stock. The G35 guy isn't bashing 350Zs and they're similar platforms. Both have good times IMO. They should be congratulating each other.
As for CMiller's times... they're legit. It's an auto. All he's doing is flooring it. He actually lost the Camaro races. He was just first across the finish line. He just got the car. He's a poor student and can't afford to mod it (sorry lol). The car did belong to his dad who wouldn't have modded it.
If the times the car is running are really that outlandish, the only possible explaination is that someone modded it before his dad bought it. If that's the case, it's only a tune because there aren't any bolt ons. If there's a way to check for a tune I'll check it myself.......
I don't know anything about those kinds of cars. I personally love the G35, G37, 350Z and 370Z. I'd take any of them. I raced a 350Z one time in my SS/TC with DP and tune. I got beat but not by much. It had Volk wheels and a Greddy turbo kit running 8 psi. It was a badass car.
I don't understand why the guy with the 350z hates so much on the guy with the G35 doing well. It's not like the G35 is faster. According to the sig, the 350Z guy is faster stock. The G35 guy isn't bashing 350Zs and they're similar platforms. Both have good times IMO. They should be congratulating each other.
As for CMiller's times... they're legit. It's an auto. All he's doing is flooring it. He actually lost the Camaro races. He was just first across the finish line. He just got the car. He's a poor student and can't afford to mod it (sorry lol). The car did belong to his dad who wouldn't have modded it.
If the times the car is running are really that outlandish, the only possible explaination is that someone modded it before his dad bought it. If that's the case, it's only a tune because there aren't any bolt ons. If there's a way to check for a tune I'll check it myself.......
I don't know anything about those kinds of cars. I personally love the G35, G37, 350Z and 370Z. I'd take any of them. I raced a 350Z one time in my SS/TC with DP and tune. I got beat but not by much. It had Volk wheels and a Greddy turbo kit running 8 psi. It was a badass car.
05-15-2013, 08:41 AM
#58
Senior Member
Join Date: 04-20-11
Location: BFN
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Edit: I think I may need to find an uprev cable from someone to check. If I do have a tune then I will be excited. But it still has factory redline and if it had one it should let me rev higher then 7800ish rpm.
Last edited by MillerCycle; 05-15-2013 at 08:48 AM.
05-15-2013, 10:45 AM
#59
Senior Member
I'll let Casionerd check then, it's had been in the family for some time. But when we bought it the engine cover was gone, which may or may not mean anything. The previous and original owner before seems like the type that may have modified it, whoever it was wore a ring on their middle finger and rested it on the shifter and had custom chromed factory wheels from LA Wheel and Tire. However in the long time of owning it the computer has been reset by taking new batteries out and putting new ones in, I would think that would eliminate any tune?
Edit: I think I may need to find an uprev cable from someone to check. If I do have a tune then I will be excited. But it still has factory redline and if it had one it should let me rev higher then 7800ish rpm.
Edit: I think I may need to find an uprev cable from someone to check. If I do have a tune then I will be excited. But it still has factory redline and if it had one it should let me rev higher then 7800ish rpm.
You can't be serious? Are you pulling my leg?
And factory redline is 7500. The thottlebodies close and it won't rev any higher. If you are revving higher than 7500 you are more than likely sporting a tune.
05-16-2013, 09:55 AM
#70
god damnit. everytime i open this stupid thread I gotta see Vander nars at the top looking all serious like.
05-16-2013, 02:14 PM
#72
Senior Member
Join Date: 04-20-11
Location: BFN
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
P.S. I'm 6'0" and weigh 170 lbs. I go off to basic in few weeks so maybe I'll take pics sometime. I don't look like that lmao
13.9-14.0 @ 101-102 mph with high 2.38+ 60 foots. My friend did 13.6 @ 102 mph with same setup and 2.0 60 foot.
If I do PCD's/IM/TB I will trap 104-105+ and would be good for mid 13's. IM/TB= $600; PCD's= $450 and 7 hour pita job.
There is no real tuner for my car that works, hondata only makes their tuning software for weed wackers.
Last edited by MillerCycle; 05-16-2013 at 02:20 PM.