G35 sedan stock VS Camaro SS L99 Auto on the track rnd 2
#77
Senior Member
Ok I just took this video of my car. A stock 07 350Z VQHR. As you can see the car absolutely will not rev above 7500. I can keep my foot planted on the floor all I'd like
.
.
#82
hmmm interesting
#87
Senior Member
Ive started to somewhat believe Millars claims, mostly because my GMS1 cobalt is way faster than it should be as well. Perhaps there is a bit of a stars aligning type of thing going on
Also a lot of things to consider
Full weight car VS a car with the trunk stripped and no spare
Full or near full tank of gas VS a car that puts in 1L per run or w/e
A fat 350lb person driving vs 150lb person
A good tank of 94 vs a poopy tank of 91
Some cars will have more intelligent computers to adjusts itself to the weather/ the way it uses the traction of the track(auto or manual)
I trapped consistent 108s with 60fts of 2.7 lol.. just GMS1
Also a lot of things to consider
Full weight car VS a car with the trunk stripped and no spare
Full or near full tank of gas VS a car that puts in 1L per run or w/e
A fat 350lb person driving vs 150lb person
A good tank of 94 vs a poopy tank of 91
Some cars will have more intelligent computers to adjusts itself to the weather/ the way it uses the traction of the track(auto or manual)
I trapped consistent 108s with 60fts of 2.7 lol.. just GMS1
#89
Senior Member
Your saying a 2.1 60ft, id trap lower?? I doubt it lol
#92
Senior Member
It comes down to how the timing system works at the track. Ask anyone with any drag experience. Spinning tires through the 60' will get you a worse ET but higher trap speeds.
#94
Senior Member
#95
Senior Member
lol people never seem to understand ET vs trap speed.
the faster you get to the finish line, the less time your car has to go faster.
hence why an AWD car will have an awesome ET but a low trap speed.
getting off the line quicker and saving time makes up for it's slower top end.
hence why an sti or evo will slaughter a tc in the 1/4 but lose from a roll.
the faster you get to the finish line, the less time your car has to go faster.
hence why an AWD car will have an awesome ET but a low trap speed.
getting off the line quicker and saving time makes up for it's slower top end.
hence why an sti or evo will slaughter a tc in the 1/4 but lose from a roll.
Last edited by Cobalt_Daddy; 05-17-2013 at 10:16 PM.
#97
Senior Member
#98
I have trapped the same mph regardless of my 60 foot. That's with g35 and accord.
Accord I have ran anywhere from 14.0 @ 101 mph to 14.9 @ 100 mph, trap speed has NEVER gone up with worse 60 foot. The only time trap has gone up(ironically with faster 60 foot) is when the DA has gone down, or if I hold out a gear a tad longer.
Heard about this theory, but evidently has never applied to ANY of my cars.
Accord I have ran anywhere from 14.0 @ 101 mph to 14.9 @ 100 mph, trap speed has NEVER gone up with worse 60 foot. The only time trap has gone up(ironically with faster 60 foot) is when the DA has gone down, or if I hold out a gear a tad longer.
Heard about this theory, but evidently has never applied to ANY of my cars.
#99
So I raced a full bolt on Cobra on drag radials(LCA's, headers, x pipe, intake, etc.; BUT no tune and STOCK gears).
Also raced a 2003 Mach 1 with exhaust and 4.10's, it was bumper to bumper to 120 mph.
Also raced a 2003 Mach 1 with exhaust and 4.10's, it was bumper to bumper to 120 mph.
Last edited by MillerCycle; 05-20-2013 at 04:34 AM.